Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Accessibility and Polarities of Pedestrian Network in University Campuses. A Space Syntax Application

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops (ICCSA 2023)

Abstract

This paper examines the multiple interactions between pedestrian mobility systems and land use planning within the framework of Agenda 2030’s sustainability goals involving the integration of mobility networks with urban planning development (i.e., targets 11.2 and 11.3). The study focuses on suburban university campuses and science parks as significant cases. Specifically, two different campuses and science parks have been selected as case studies, i.e., Parma and Monserrato (metropolitan city of Cagliari), located in peripheral areas and built during the second half of the 20th century. The methodological approach is based on Space Syntax, to analyse the spatial configuration of the pedestrian infrastructure of each campus. First, a segment map reflecting all pedestrian routes on each campus has been created. Then, multiple measures have been calculated using the DepthmapX software, evaluating accessibility and identifying polarities. Subsequently, the strengths and weaknesses of each campus’s pedestrian infrastructure network have been identified and a comparison analysis between the two case studies has been performed to identify common and efficient space conformation characteristics according to the Space Syntax analysis. The study concludes with an analysis of the limitations of the methodology and provides suggestions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. United Nations, The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rode, P., et al.: Accessibility in Cities: Transport and Urban Form. NCE Cities Paper (03). LSE Cities. London School of Economics and Political Science (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Istituto Superiore di Formazione e Ricerca per i Trasporti (ISFORT), 19° Rapporto sulla mobilità degli italiani. https://www.isfort.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/19-Rapporto_mobilita_italiani_Sintesi.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2023

  5. Kenworthy, J.R., Laube, F.B.: Automobile dependence in cities: an international comparison of urban transport and land use patterns with implications for sustainability. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 16(4–6), 279–308 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Newman, P., Kenworthy, J.: Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boarnet, M., Crane, R.: Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Tira, M., Tiboni, M., Rossetti, S., De Robertis, M.: “Smart” planning to enhance nonmotorised and safe mobility in today’s cities. In: Papa, R., Fistola, R., Gargiulo, C. (eds.) Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change. GET, pp. 201–213. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Tiboni, M., Rossetti, S., Vetturi, D., Torrisi, V., Botticini, F., Schaefer, M.D.: Urban policies and planning approaches for a safer and climate friendlier mobility in cities: strategies initiatives and some analysis. Sustainability 13, 1778 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carpentieri, G., Guida, C., Chorus, P.: Land-Use and Transport integration polices and real estate values. the development of a GIS methodology and the application to Naples (Italy). TeMA – J. Land Use, Mobility Environ. 12(3), pp. 313–330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6273

  11. Pellicelli, G., Caselli, B., Garau, C., Torrisi, V., Rossetti, S.: Sustainable mobility and accessibility to essential services. an assessment of the san benedetto neighbourhood in Cagliari (Italy). In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Garau, C. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022 Workshops, ICCSA 2022, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (13382), Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10592-0_31

  12. Gallo, M., Marinelli, M.: Sustainable mobility: a review of possible actions and policies. Sustainability 12(8) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187499

  13. Pellicelli, G., Rossetti, S., Caselli, B., Zazzi, M.: Urban regeneration to enhance sustainable mobility. TEMA – J. Land Use, Mobility and Environ., pp. 57–70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/8646

  14. Ewing, R., Handy, S.: Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability. J. Urban Des. 14(1), 65–84 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mrak, I., Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Canale, A., Cindrić, M.: The role of urban and social factors in the accessibility of urban areas for people with motor and visual disabilities, In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2186(1), p. 160008, AIP Publishing LLC (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138076

  16. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Le Pira, M., Torrisi, V., Calabrò, G.: A step towards walkable environments: spatial analysis of pedestrian compatibility in an urban context. European Transport 76(6) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Annunziata, A., Garau, C.: A literature review on walkability and its theoretical framework. emerging perspectives for research developments. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12255, pp. 422–437. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Caselli, B., Rossetti, S., Ignaccolo, M., Zazzi, M., Torrisi, V.: Towards the definition of a comprehensive walkability index for historical centres. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2021. LNCS, vol. 12958, pp. 493–508. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Blečić, I., Cecchini, A., Congiu, T., Fancello, G., Triunfo, G.A.: Evaluating walkability: a capability-wise planning and design support system. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 29(8), 1350–1374 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Talen, E.: Pedestrian access as a measure of urban quality. Plan. Pract. Res. 17(3), 257–278 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/026974502200005634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rossetti, S.: Planning for Accessibility and Safety: theoretical framework and research methodologies to address people friendly mobility. Maggioli Editore, Sant’Arcangelo di Romagna (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Caselli, B., Carra, M., Rossetti, S., Zazzi, M.: Exploring the 15-minute neighbourhoods: an evaluation based on the walkability performance to public facilities. Transp. Res. Procedia 60, 346–353 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsigdinos, S., Latinopoulou, M., Paraskevopoulos, Y.: Network configuration as tool for improving pedestrian accessibility: Implementing a street design methodology in an Athenian neighbourhood. In: Proceedings of the 12thSpace Syntax Symposium, SSS2019, (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lamíquiz, P.J., López-Domínguez, J.: Effects of built environment on walking at the neighbourhood scale. a new role for street networks by modelling their configurational accessibility?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74(2015), 148–163 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.003

  25. Lerman, Y., Rofè, Y., Omer, I.: Using space syntax to model pedestrian movement in urban transportation planning. Geogr. Anal. 46(4), 392–410 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Garau, C., Annunziata, A., Yamu, C.: A walkability assessment tool coupling multicriteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy, European Planning Studies, pp. 1–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1761947

  27. Soares, I., Yamu, C., Weitkamp, G.: The relationship between the spatial configuration and the fourth sustainable dimension creativity in university campuses: the case study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands, Sustainability 12, 9263 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219263

  28. Salingaros, N.: Planning, complexity, and welcoming spaces: the case of campus design, Chapter 18. In: Gert, R., Claudia, Y., Christian, Z. (eds.): Handbook on Planning and Complexity, pp. 353–372 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bott, H.: City and university: an architect’s notes on an intriguing spatial relationship. In: Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M., Suarsana, L.: Geographies of the University, Knowledge and Space 12, Springer International Publishing, pp. 375- 437 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Università degli Studi di Parma, Unipr sostenibile, Mobilità. https://ateneosostenibile.unipr.it/mobilita/. Accessed 30 Mar 2023

  31. Università degli Studi di Parma, Piano Urbanistico Attuativo: completamento e riorganizzazione funzionale del piano particolareggiato 1997 per il Campus Scienze e Tecnologie, Relazione introduttiva: il progetto MASTERCAMPUS e relazione tecnica (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. SPA srl., Complesso Universitario di Monserrato. Proposta di riordino e assestamento del piano Italposte. Relazione paesaggistica ai sensi del DPCM 12/12/200 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237

  34. Hillier, B.: Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cutini, V.: La rivincita dello spazio urbano. L’approccio configurazionale all’analisi e allo studio dei centri abitati. Pisa University Press, Pisa (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yamu, C., van Nes, A., Garau, C.: Bill Hillier’s legacy: space syntax—a synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application. Sustainability 13(6), 3394 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamu, C., van Nes, A.: Analysing linear spatial relationships: the measures of connectivity, integration, and choice. In: Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies 78 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ratti, C.: Space syntax: some inconsistencies. Environ. Plann. B. Plann. Des. 31(4), 487–499 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1068/b3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pinna, F., Garau, C., Maltinti, F., Coni, M.: Beyond architectural barriers: building a bridge between disability and universal design. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12255, pp. 706–721. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is the result of a project proposal developed within the doctoral course Smart and Sustainable Cities (3rd edition) held at the University of Cagliari and coordinated by C. Garau (https://dottorati.unica.it/dotticar/smart-and-sustainable-cities-3-edizione/). The course was attended by LJM to refine theoretical and methodological tools with reference to the topics researched in the framework of the Sustainable Mobility Centre (CNMS) Spoke 9, WP3. Funder: Project funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4 - Call for tender No. 3138 of 16/12/2021 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU. Award Number: Project code CN00000023, Concession Decree No. 1033 of 17/06/2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP D93C22000400001, “Sustainable Mobility Center” (CNMS). The work of V. Torrisi was supported by European Union (NextGeneration EU), through the MUR-PNRR project SAMOTHRACE (ECS00000022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Caselli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marinelli, L.J., Annunziata, A., Caselli, B., Desogus, G., Torrisi, V., Garau, C. (2023). Accessibility and Polarities of Pedestrian Network in University Campuses. A Space Syntax Application. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37126-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37126-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37125-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37126-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics