Look Before You Leap! Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Inferences in Wearable Fitness Trackers

1. CCS Insight (2018). https://www.ccsinsight.com/press/company-news/3695-success-of-apple-watch-means-more-growth-in-sales-of-wearable-technology/

2. Hern, A. (2018). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/28/fitness-tracking-app-gives-away-location-of-secret-us-army-bases

3. Rader, E., Slaker, J.: The importance of visibility for folk theories of sensor data. In: Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (\(\{\)SOUPS\(\}\) 2017), pp. 257–270 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

4. Schneegass, S., Poguntke, R., Machulla, T.: Understanding the impact of information representation on willingness to share information. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–6 (2019)

   Google Scholar 

5. Bilogrevic, I., Ortlieb, M.: “If you put all the pieces together...” attitudes towards data combination and sharing across services and companies. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 5215–5227 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

6. Dolin, C., et al.: Unpacking perceptions of data-driven inferences underlying online targeting and personalization. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2018)

   Google Scholar 

7. Ur, B., Leon, P.G., Cranor, L.F., Shay, R., Wang, Y.: Smart, useful, scary, creepy: perceptions of online behavioral advertising. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 1–15 (2012)

   Google Scholar 

8. Rader, E., Hautea, S., Munasinghe, A.: “I have a narrow thought process”: constraints on explanations connecting inferences and self-perceptions. In: Sixteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (\(\{\)SOUPS\(\}\) 2020), pp. 457–488 (2020)

   Google Scholar 

9. Aktypi, A., Nurse, J.R., Goldsmith, M.: Unwinding Ariadne’s identity thread: privacy risks with fitness trackers and online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 on Multimedia Privacy and Security, pp. 1–11 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

10. Alqhatani, A., Lipford, H.R.: “There is nothing that i need to keep secret”: sharing practices and concerns of wearable fitness data. In: Fifteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (\(\{\)SOUPS\(\}\) 2019) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

11. Gabriele, S., Chiasson, S.: Understanding fitness tracker users’ security and privacy knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

12. Motti, V.G., Caine, K.: Users’ privacy concerns about wearables. In: Brenner, M., Christin, N., Johnson, B., Rohloff, K. (eds.) FC 2015. LNCS, vol. 8976, pp. 231–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

13. Vitak, J., Liao, Y., Kumar, P., Zimmer, M., Kritikos, K.: Privacy attitudes and data valuation among fitness tracker users. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds.) iConference 2018. LNCS, vol. 10766, pp. 229–239. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

14. Hautea, S., Munasinghe, A., Rader, E.: ‘That’s not me’: surprising algorithmic inferences. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–7 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

15. Thomaz, E., Essa, I., Abowd, G.D.: A practical approach for recognizing eating moments with wrist-mounted inertial sensing. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 1029–1040 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

16. Kröger, J.L., Raschke, P., Bhuiyan, T.R.: Privacy implications of accelerometer data: a review of possible inferences. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy, pp. 81–87 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

17. Meteriz, Ü., Yıldıran, N.F., Mohaisen, A.: You can run, but you cannot hide: using elevation profiles to breach location privacy through trajectory prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09041 (2019)

18. Warshaw, J., Taft, N., Woodruff, A.: Intuitions, analytics, and killing ants: inference literacy of high school-educated adults in the \(\{\)US\(\}\). In: Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (\(\{\)SOUPS\(\}\) 2016), pp. 271–285 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

19. Lupton, D.: Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Cult. Health Sex. 17(4), 440–453 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Peppet, S.R.: Regulating the internet of things: first steps toward managing discrimination, privacy, security and consent. Tex. L. Rev. 93, 85 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

21. Kröger, J.: Unexpected inferences from sensor data: a hidden privacy threat in the internet of things. In: Strous, L., Cerf, V.G. (eds.) IFIPIoT 2018. IAICT, vol. 548, pp. 147–159. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15651-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

22. Rader, E.: Awareness of behavioral tracking and information privacy concern in Facebook and Google. In: 10th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (\(\{\)SOUPS\(\}\) 2014), pp. 51–67 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

23. Weinshel, B., et al.: Oh, the places you’ve been! User reactions to longitudinal transparency about third-party web tracking and inferencing. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 149–166 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

24. Gorm, N., Shklovski, I.: Sharing steps in the workplace: changing privacy concerns over time. In: proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4315–4319 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

25. Ziegeldorf, J.H., Morchon, O.G., Wehrle, K.: Privacy in the internet of things: threats and challenges. Secur. Commun. Netw. 7(12), 2728–2742 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Wagner, I., He, Y., Rosenberg, D., Janicke, H.: User interface design for privacy awareness in eHealth technologies. In: 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 38–43. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

27. Zimmer, M., Kumar, P., Vitak, J., Liao, Y., Chamberlain Kritikos, K.: ‘There’s nothing really they can do with this information’: unpacking how users manage privacy boundaries for personal fitness information. Inf. Commun. Soc. 23(7), 1020–1037 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Naeini, P.E., et al.: Privacy expectations and preferences in an IoT world. In: Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (\(\{\)SOUPS\(\}\) 2017), pp. 399–412 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

29. Paul, G., Irvine, J.: Privacy implications of wearable health devices. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks, pp. 117–121 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

30. Rao, L.: (2011). https://techcrunch.com/2011/07/03/sexual-activity-tracked-by-fitbit-shows-up-in-google-search-results/

31. Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H.: Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 989–1015 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references