Platform Urbanism for Sustainability

1. Vadiati, N.: Alternatives to smart cities: a call for consideration of grassroots digital urbanism. Digit. Geogr. Soc. 3, 100030 (2022)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Barns, S.: Platform Urbanism: Negotiating Platform Ecosystems in Connected Cities. Springer Nature (2019)

   Google Scholar 

3. Münster, S., et al.: How to involve inhabitants in urban design planning by using digital tools? An overview on a state of the art, key challenges and promising approaches. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 2391–2405 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Billger, M., Thuvander, L., Wästberg, B.S.: In search of visualization challenges: the development and implementation of visualization tools for supporting dialogue in urban planning processes. Environ. Plan. B: Urban Analyt. City Sci. 44(6), 1012–1035 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

5. Lock, O., Bednarz, T., Leao, S.Z., Pettit, C.: A review and reframing of participatory urban dashboards. City Cult. Soc. 20, 100294 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Schwarz, N., Haase, D., Seppelt, R.: Omnipresent sprawl? A review of urban simulation models with respect to urban shrinkage. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 37(2), 265–283 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Hasler, S., Chenal, J., Soutter, M.: Digital tools as a means to foster inclusive, data-informed urban planning. Civil Eng. Architect. 5(6), 230–239 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. O’grady, M., O’hare, G.: How smart is your city? Science 335(6076), 1581–1582 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Yin, C., Xiong, Z., Chen, H., Wang, J., Cooper, D., David, B.: A literature survey on smart cities. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 58(10), 1–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5397-4

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M.: Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22(1), 3–21 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Chamoso, P., González-Briones, A., Rodríguez, S., Corchado, J.M.: Tendencies of technologies and platforms in smart cities: a state-of-the-art review. Wirel. Commun. Mobile Comput. 2018, 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3086854

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Silva, B.N., Khan, M., Han, K.: Towards sustainable smart cities: a review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 38, 697–713 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. LeGates, R., Stout, F.: The City Reader, 6th ed. Routledge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

14. Mitlin, D.: Editorial: citizen participation in planning: from the neighbourhood to the city. Environ. Urban. 33(2), 295–309 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478211035608

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Hall, P.: Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century, 3rd edn. Blackwell (2002)

    Google Scholar 

16. Forester, J.: Planning in the face of conflict. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 53(3), 303–314 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Fainstein, S.S.: New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Rev. 35(4), 451–478 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740003500401

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Healey, P.: Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Macmillan Press (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

19. Lane, M.B.: Public participation in planning: an intellectual history. Aust. Geogr. 36(3), 283–299 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. de Carli, B., Frediani, A.A.: Situated perspectives on the city: a reflection on scaling participation through design. Environ. Urban. 33(2), 376–395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478211028066

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Kelly, E.D.: Community Planning: An Introduction to the Comprehensive Plan, 2nd edn. Island Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

22. Vuksanović-Macura, Z., Miščević, I.: Excluded communities and participatory land-use planning: experience from informal Roma settlements in Serbia. Environ. Urban. 33(2), 456–477 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478211024095

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Rotondo, F.: The U-City paradigm: opportunities and risks for e-democracy in collaborative planning. Future Internet 4(2), 563–574 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi4020563

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. The World Bank: The World Bank Participation Sourcebook (1995)

    Google Scholar 

25. Davidoff, P.: Advocacy and pluralism in planning. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 31(4), 331–338 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978187

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 35(4), 216–224 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Painter, M.: Participation and power. In: Munro-Clarke, M. (ed.) Citizen Participation in Government, pp. 21–36. Hale & Ironmonger (1992)

    Google Scholar 

28. New Economics Foundation: Participation Works! 21 Techniques of Community Participation for the 21st Century (1998)

    Google Scholar 

29. Wilcox, D.: Guide to Effective Participation. Partnership Books (1994)

    Google Scholar 

30. Stauffacher, M., Flüeler, T., Krütli, P., Scholz, R.W.: Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss Prealpine region. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 21(6), 409–422 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. UN-Habitat: SDG Indicator 11.3.2 Training Module: Civic Participation. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

32. Almansi, F., Motta, J.M., Hardoy, J.: Incorporating a resilience lens into the social and urban transformation of informal settlements: the participatory upgrading process in Villa 20, Buenos Aires (2016–2020). Environ. Urban. 32(2), 407–428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820935717

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Menegat, R.: Participatory democracy and sustainable development: integrated urban environmental management in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Environ. Urban. 14(2), 181–206 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Cabannes, Y.: Contributions of participatory budgeting to climate change adaptation and mitigation: current local practices across the world and lessons from the field. Environ. Urban. 33(2), 356–375 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478211021710

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Parker, G.G., Van Alstyne, M.W., Choudary, S.P.: Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. WW Norton & Company (2016)

    Google Scholar 

36. Kakderi, C., Psaltoglou, A., Fellnhofer, K.: Digital platforms and online applications for user engagement and collaborative innovation. In: The 20th Conference of the Greek Society of Regional Scientists (2018)

    Google Scholar 

37. Komninos, N., Kakderi, C. (eds.): Smart Cities in the Post-algorithmic Era: Integrating Technologies, Platforms and Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing (2019)

    Google Scholar 

38. Panori, A., Kakderi, C., Komninos, N., Fellnhofer, K., Reid, A., Mora, L.: Smart systems of innovation for smart places: challenges in deploying digital platforms for co-creation and data-intelligence. Land Use Policy 111, 104631 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Katmada, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C.: The landscape of digital platforms for bottom-up collaboration, creativity, and innovation creation. In: Streitz, N.A., Konomi, S. (eds.) Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions. Smart Environments, Ecosystems, and Cities: 10th International Conference, DAPI 2022, Held as Part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, Proceedings, pp. 28–42. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05463-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

40. Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Collado, A., Papadaki, I., Panori, A.: Digital transformation of city ecosystems: platforms shaping engagement and externalities across vertical markets. In: Sustainable Smart City Transitions, pp. 91–112. Routledge (2022)

    Google Scholar 

41. Caprotti, F., Chang, I.-C.C., Joss, S.: Beyond the smart city: a typology of platform urbanism. Urban Transform. 4(1), 4 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. Van Dijck, J., Poell, J., De Waal, M.: The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

43. Caprotti, F., Liu, D.: Emerging platform urbanism in China: reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 151, 119690 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Sadowski, J.: Cyberspace and cityscapes: on the emergence of platform urbanism. Urban Geogr. 41(3), 448–452 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Saunders, T., Baeck, P.: Rethinking Smart Cities from the Ground Up. Nesta, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

46. Gleeson, D., Dyer, M.: Manifesto for collaborative urbanism. In: Certomà, C., Dyer, M., Pocatilu, L., Rizzi, F. (eds.) Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City, pp. 3–18. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47904-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

47. De Lange, M., De Waal, M.: Owning the city: new media and citizen engagement in urban design. In: Etingoff, K. (ed.) Urban Land Use: Community-Based Planning, pp. 87–110. Apple Academic Press, 3333 Mistwell Crescent, Oakville, ON L6L 0A2, Canada (2017). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315365794-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

48. Keymolen, E., Voorwinden, A.: Can we negotiate? Trust and the rule of law in the smart city paradigm. Int. Rev. Law Comput. Technol. 34(3), 233–253 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

49. Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A.: Digital social innovation in support of spatial planning. An investigation through nine initiatives in three smart city programmes. Spatium 7–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

50. Stelzle, B., Jannack, A., Noennig, J.R.: Co-design and co-decision: decision making on collaborative design platforms. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 2435–2444 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. Abel, P., Miether, D., Plötzky, F., Robra-Bissantz, S.: The shape of bottom-up urbanism participatory platforms: a conceptualisation and empirical study. In: BLED 2021 Proceedings, 32 (2021). https://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2021/32

52. Smaniotto Costa, C., Bahillo Martínez, A., Álvarez, F.J., Šuklje Erjavec, I., Menezes, M., Pallares-Barbera, M.: Digital tools for capturing user’s needs on urban open spaces: drawing lessons from cyberparks project. In: Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City, pp. 177–193. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

53. Treutel, E.: Crowdfunding Community Projects (2014)

    Google Scholar 

54. Hollow, M.: Crowdfunding and civic society in Europe: a profitable partnership? Open Citizenship 4(1), 68–73 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

55. Certomà, C., Rizzi, F.: Crowdsourcing processes for citizen-driven governance. In: Certomà, C., Dyer, M., Pocatilu, L., Rizzi, F. (eds.) Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City, pp. 57–77. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47904-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

56. Bashandy, H.: Playing, mapping, and power: a critical analysis of using “minecraft” in spatial design. Am. J. Play 12(3), 363–389 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

57. McDaniel, T.: Block by Block: The Use of the Video Game “Minecraft” as a Tool to Increase Public Participation (2018)

    Google Scholar 

58. Soe, R.M., Ruohomäki, T., Patzig, H.: Urban open platform for borderless smart cities. Appl. Sci. 12(2), 700 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

59. Smith, A., Martín, P.P.: Going beyond the smart city? Implementing technopolitical platforms for urban democracy in Madrid and Barcelona. In: Sustainable Smart City Transitions, pp. 280–299. Routledge (2022)

    Google Scholar 

60. Aragón, P., et al.: Deliberative platform design: the case study of the online discussions in Decidim Barcelona. In: Ciampaglia, G.L., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds.) Social Informatics: 9th International Conference, SocInfo 2017, Oxford, UK, September 13–15, 2017, Proceedings, Part II 9, pp. 277–287. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

61. Peña-López, I.: Decidim, Barcelona, Spain (2017)

    Google Scholar 

62. Rask, M., Ertiö, T.P., Tuominen, P., Ahonen, V.L.: Final evaluation of the City of Helsinki’s participatory budgeting: OmaStadi 2018–2020 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

63. Bason, C., Conway, R., Hill, D., Mazzucato, M.: A New Bauhaus for a Green Deal (2020). https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2021/jan/new-bauhaus-green-deal. Accessed 23 Feb 2023

64. Chiappini, L., de Vries, J.: Civic crowdfunding as urban digital platform in Milan and Amsterdam: don’t take pictures on a rainy day! Digital Geogr. Soc. 3, 100024 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

65. Richardson, L.: Coordinating the city: platforms as flexible spatial arrangements. Urban Geogr. 41(3), 458–461 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

66. Fields, D., Bissell, D., Macrorie, R.: Platform methods: studying platform urbanism outside the black box. Urban Geogr. 41(3), 462–468 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references