Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Hardware Trojan Exploiting Coherence Protocol on NoCs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies (PDCAT 2022)

Abstract

Intellectual property (IP) has been used in Network on chips (NoCs) for reducing costs and shortening the time to market. However, there is a probability that a third-party vendor injects hardware that behaves maliciously. This study firstly illustrates the security risk of a hardware Trojan for eavesdropping and reducing the system performance by malicious coherent messages. It only increases the amounts of communications and calculations obeying a coherence protocol, allowing applications to perform correctly. This study secondly presents its countermeasure at network interfaces. It compares the number of output messages to input messages at network interfaces to detect malicious coherent messages. This risk causes, on a chip-multiprocessor, execution time to increase by up to 24%, the amount of traffic to increase by up to 18%, and the energy consumption to increase by up to 8.9%. Since the benchmarks in the evaluation are small, we expect that real-life applications would be highly affected by the hardware Trojan. Our countermeasure avoids these performance degradation, and it can be implemented with a significantly low overhead of only 1.3% in a network interface on a chip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The word “owner” appears frequently in this study. This is not the owner of the owned status in the coherent status, but it is used in the sense of “having the final write back responsibility to the lower cache hierarchy”. Therefore, “the owner core of the data corresponding to a specific address” refers to both the owner of the data corresponding to the address in the owner status and the only core that caches the data corresponding to the address in the modified status in the coherent status.

References

  1. Ancajas, D.M., Chakraborty, K., Roy, S.: Fort-NoCs: mitigating the threat of a compromised NoC. In: Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 1–6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles, S., Mishra, P.: Securing network-on-chip using incremental cryptography. In: Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI), pp. 168–175 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charles, S., Mishra, P.: A survey of network-on-chip security attacks and countermeasures. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 54(5), 1–36 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hussain, M., Malekpour, A., Guo, H., Parameswaran, S.: EETD: an energy efficient design for runtime hardware trojan detection in untrusted network-on-chip. In: Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI), pp. 345–350 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, M., Kong, S., Hong, B., Xu, L., Shi, W., Suh, T.: Evaluating coherence-exploiting hardware trojan. In: Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE), pp. 157–162 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Binkert, N., et al.: The gem5 Simulator. ACM SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 39(2), 1–7 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajesh, J., Ancajas, D.M., Chakraborty, K., Roy, S.: Runtime detection of a bandwidth denial attack from a rogue network-on-chip. In: International Symposium on Networks-on-Chip, pp. 1–8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raparti, V.Y., Pasricha, S.: Lightweight mitigation of hardware trojan attacks in NoC-based manycore computing. In: Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ro, Y., Jin, S., Huh, J., Kim, J.: Ghost routing to enable oblivious computation on memory-centric networks. In: International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), pp. 930–943 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tehranipoor, M., Koushanfar, F.: A survey of hardware trojan taxonomy and detection. IEEE Des. Test Comput. 27(1), 10–25 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolff, F., Papachristou, C., Bhunia, S., Chakraborty, R.S.: Towards trojan-free trusted ICs: problem analysis and detection scheme. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE), pp. 1362–1365 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19H01106.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michihiro Koibuchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shikama, Y., Koibuchi, M., Amano, H. (2023). A Hardware Trojan Exploiting Coherence Protocol on NoCs. In: Takizawa, H., Shen, H., Hanawa, T., Hyuk Park, J., Tian, H., Egawa, R. (eds) Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies. PDCAT 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13798. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29927-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29927-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29926-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29927-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics