Abstract
We investigate an attack on a machine learning classifier that predicts the propensity of a person or household to move (i.e., relocate) in the next two years. The attack assumes that the classifier has been made publically available and that the attacker has access to information about a certain number of target individuals. That attacker might also have information about another set of people to train an auxiliary classifier. We show that the attack is possible for target individuals independently of whether they were contained in the original training set of the classifier. However, the attack is somewhat less successful for individuals that were not contained in the original data. Based on this observation, we investigate whether training the classifier on a data set that is synthesized from the original training data, rather than using the original training data directly, would help to mitigate the effectiveness of the attack. Our experimental results show that it does not, leading us to conclude that new approaches to data synthesis must be developed if synthesized data is to resemble “unseen” individuals to an extent great enough to help to block machine learning model attacks.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy of Statistics Netherlands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
We note that reducing the number of features does not have an impact on the success rate of the attack because there is a redundancy in some variables since they go until 17 years back [3].
- 4.
Random Classifier using Stratified strategy from https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.dummy.DummyClassifier.html.
- 5.
Random Forest Classifier: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestClassifier.html.
References
Mehnaz, S., Dibbo, S.V., Kabir, E., Li, N., Bertino, E.: Are your sensitive attributes private? Novel model inversion attribute inference attacks on classification models. In: 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security), Boston, MA. USENIX Association (2022)
Andreou, A., Goga, O., Loiseau, P.: Identity vs. attribute disclosure risks for users with multiple social profiles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 163–170. ASONAM (2017)
Burger, J., Buelens, B., de Jong, T., Gootzen, Y.: Replacing a survey question by predictive modeling using register data. In: ISI World Statistics Congress, pp. 1–6 (2019)
Coulter, R., Scott, J.: What motivates residential mobility? Re-examining self-reported reasons for desiring and making residential moves. Popul. Space Place 21(4), 354–371 (2015)
Crull, S.R.: Residential satisfaction, propensity to move, and residential mobility: a causal model. In: Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1979). http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/
De Cristofaro, E.: A critical overview of privacy in machine learning. IEEE Secur. Priv. 19(4), 19–27 (2021)
Domingo-Ferrer, J.: A survey of inference control methods for privacy-preserving data mining. In: Aggarwal, C.C., Yu, P.S. (eds.) Privacy-Preserving Data Mining, pp. 53–80. Springer, Boston (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_3
Drechsler, J.: Synthetic Datasets for Statistical Disclosure Control: Theory and Implementation, vol. 201. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0326-5
Drechsler, J., Reiter, J.P.: An empirical evaluation of easily implemented, nonparametric methods for generating synthetic datasets. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 55(12), 3232–3243 (2011)
Fackler, D., Rippe, L.: Losing work, moving away? Regional mobility after job loss. Labour 31(4), 457–479 (2017)
Fredrikson, M., Jha, S., Ristenpart, T.: Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (SIGSAC), CCS 2015, pp. 1322–1333 (2015)
Fredrikson, M., Lantz, E., Jha, S., Lin, S., Page, D., Ristenpart, T.: Privacy in pharmacogenetics: an end-to-end case study of personalized warfarin dosing. In: 23rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security), San Diego, CA, pp. 17–32. USENIX Association (2014)
Heyburn, R., et al.: Machine learning using synthetic and real data: similarity of evaluation metrics for different healthcare datasets and for different algorithms. In: Data Science and Knowledge Engineering for Sensing Decision Support: Proceedings of the 13th International FLINS Conference, pp. 1281–1291. World Scientific (2018)
Hidano, S., Murakami, T., Katsumata, S., Kiyomoto, S., Hanaoka, G.: Model inversion attacks for prediction systems: without knowledge of non-sensitive attributes. In: 15th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), pp. 115–11509. IEEE (2017)
Hittmeir, M., Mayer, R., Ekelhart, A.: A baseline for attribute disclosure risk in synthetic data. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, pp. 133–143 (2020)
Hundepool, A., et al.: Statistical Disclosure Control. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)
de Jong, P.A.: Later-life migration in the Netherlands: propensity to move and residential mobility. J. Aging Environ. 36, 1–10 (2020)
Kleinhans, R.: Does social capital affect residents’ propensity to move from restructured neighbourhoods? Hous. Stud. 24(5), 629–651 (2009)
Liu, B., Ding, M., Shaham, S., Rahayu, W., Farokhi, F., Lin, Z.: When machine learning meets privacy: a survey and outlook. ACM Comput. Surv. 54(2), 1–36 (2021)
Reiter, J.P., Mitra, R.: Estimating risks of identification disclosure in partially synthetic data. J. Priv. Confid. 1(1) (2009)
Reiter, J.P., Wang, Q., Zhang, B.: Bayesian estimation of disclosure risks for multiply imputed, synthetic data. J. Priv. Confid. 6(1) (2014)
Rigaki, M., Garcia, S.: A survey of privacy attacks in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07646 (2020)
Salter, C., Saydjari, O.S., Schneier, B., Wallner, J.: Toward a secure system engineering methodology. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, pp. 2–10. NSPW (1998)
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., Shmatikov, V.: Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In: Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 3–18. IEEE (2017)
Stadler, T., Oprisanu, B., Troncoso, C.: Synthetic data-anonymisation groundhog day. In: 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security). USENIX Association (2020)
Taub, J., Elliot, M., Pampaka, M., Smith, D.: Differential correct attribution probability for synthetic data: an exploration. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Montes, F. (eds.) PSD 2018. LNCS, vol. 11126, pp. 122–137. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99771-1_9
Templ, M.: Statistical Disclosure Control for Microdata: Methods and Applications in R. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50272-4
Tramèr, F., Zhang, F., Juels, A., Reiter, M.K., Ristenpart, T.: Stealing machine learning models via prediction APIs. In: 25th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 2016), Austin, TX, pp. 601–618. USENIX Association (2016)
Yeom, S., Giacomelli, I., Fredrikson, M., Jha, S.: Privacy risk in machine learning: analyzing the connection to overfitting. In: 31st Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), pp. 268–282. IEEE (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Slokom, M., de Wolf, PP., Larson, M. (2022). When Machine Learning Models Leak: An Exploration of Synthetic Training Data. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Laurent, M. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13945-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13945-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13944-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13945-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)