Abstract
Students often lack intrinsic motivation to engage with educational activities. While gamification has the potential to mitigate that issue, it does not always work, possibly due to poor gamification design. Researchers have developed strategies to improve gamification designs through personalization. However, most of those are based on theoretical understanding of game elements and their impact on students, instead of considering real interaction data. Thus, we developed an approach to personalize gamification designs upon data from real students’ experiences with a learning environment. We followed the CRISP-DM methodology to develop personalization strategies by analyzing self-reports from 221 Brazilian students who used one out of our five gamification designs. Then, we regressed from such data to obtain recommendations of which design is the most suitable to achieve a desired motivation level, leading to our interactive recommender system: GARFIELD. Its recommendations showed a moderate performance compared to the ground truth, demonstrating our approach’s potential. To the best of our knowledge, GARFIELD is the first model to guide practitioners and instructors on how to personalize gamification based on empirical data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For transparency, this link details our dataset and all analysis: osf.io/nt97s.
- 2.
We consider Badges and Leaderboards implementations of Acknowledgments and Competition, respectively [10], but use PBL to maintain the standard nomenclature.
References
Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., Blanchard, C.: On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the situational motivation scale (sims). Motiv. Emot. 24(3), 175–213 (2000)
Klock, A.C.T., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M.S., Hamari, J.: Tailored gamification: a review of literature. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. (2020)
Kwak, C., Clayton, A.: Multinomial logistic regression. Nurs. Res. 51 (2002)
Palomino, P., Toda, A., Rodrigues, L., Oliveira, W., Isotani, S.: From the lack of engagement to motivation: gamification strategies to enhance users learning experiences. In: 19th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGames)-GranDGames BR Forum, pp. 1127–1130 (2020)
Rodrigues, L., et al.: How personalization affects motivation in gamified review assessments, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EHM43
Rodrigues, L., Toda, A.M., Oliveira, W., Palomino, P.T., Avila-Santos, A.P., Isotani, S.: Gamification works, but how and to whom? an experimental study in the context of programming lessons. In: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 184–190 (2021)
Rodrigues, L., Toda, A.M., dos Santos, W.O., Palomino, P.T., Vassileva, J., Isotani, S.: Automating gamification personalization to the user and beyond. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. (2022)
Sailer, M., Homner, L.: The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 32(1), 77–112 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Stuart, H., Lavoué, E., Serna, A.: To tailor or not to tailor gamification? An analysis of the impact of tailored game elements on learners’ behaviours and motivation. In: 21th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2020)
Toda, A.M., et al.: Analysing gamification elements in educational environments using an existing gamification taxonomy. Smart Learn. Environ. 6(1), 16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0106-1
Tondello, G.F.: Dynamic personalization of gameful interactive systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo (2019)
Viera, A.J., Garrett, J.M., et al.: Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam. Med. 37(5), 360–363 (2005)
Vornhagen, J.B., Tyack, A., Mekler, E.D.: Statistical significance testing at chi play: challenges and opportunities for more transparency. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 4–18 (2020)
Wirth, R., Hipp, J.: CRISP-DM: towards a standard process model for data mining. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, vol. 1. Springer, London, UK (2000). https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/BLCP:CN039162600/CRISP-DM-Towards-a-Standard-Process-Model-for-Data?cHash=16bb58abe6455a858f809fd55fb0ca8f
Acknowledgments
This research received financial support from the following Brazilian institutions: CNPq (141859/2019-9, 163932/2020-4, 308458/2020-6, 308513/2020-7, and 308395 /2020-4); CAPES (Finance code - 001; PROAP/AUXPE); FAPESP (2018/ 15917-0, 2013/07375-0); Samsung-UFAM (agreements 001/2020 and 003/2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodrigues, L. et al. (2022). GARFIELD: A Recommender System to Personalize Gamified Learning. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)