Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

On Dimensions of Plausibility for Narrative Information Access to Digital Libraries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2022)

Abstract

Designing keyword-based access paths is a common practice in digital libraries. They are easy to use and accepted by users and come with moderate costs for content providers. However, users usually have to break down the search into pieces if they search for stories of interest that are more complex than searching for a few keywords. After searching for every piece one by one, information must then be reassembled manually. In previous work we recommended narrative information access, i.e., users can precisely state their information needs as graph patterns called narratives. Then a system takes a narrative and searches for evidence for each of its parts. If the whole query, i.e., every part, can be bound against data, the narrative is considered plausible and, thus, the query is answered. But is it as easy as that? In this work we perform case studies to analyze the process of making a given narrative plausible. Therefore, we summarize conceptual problems and challenges to face. Moreover, we contribute a set of dimensions that must be considered when realizing narrative information access in digital libraries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plastics and the Environment. https://www.genevaenvironmentnetwork.org/resources/updates/plastics-and-the-environment/. Accessed May 2022

  2. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Azzarello, M.Y., Vleet, E.S.V.: Marine birds and plastic pollution. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 37(2/3), 295–303 (1987). http://www.jstor.org/stable/24824704

  4. Bank, W.: Forest area (% of land area). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.ZS. Accessed 25 May 2022

  5. Blakeskee, S.: The CRAAP test. LOEX Quart. 31, 4(2004). https://commons.emich.edu/loexquarterly/vol31/iss3/4

  6. Blatz, J., et al.: Confidence estimation for machine translation. In: COLING 2004: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 315–321. COLING, Geneva, Switzerland, 23–27 August 2004. https://aclanthology.org/C04-1046

  7. Carroll, J.J., Bizer, C., Hayes, P.J., Stickler, P.: Named graphs. J. Web Semant. 3(4), 247–267 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2005.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman, A., et al.: Dataset search: a survey. VLDB J. 29(1), 251–272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-019-00564-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, J.R., et al.: Marine microplastic debris: a targeted plan for understanding and quantifying interactions with marine life. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14(6), 317–324 (2016). http://www.jstor.org/stable/44001167

  10. Elbassuoni, S., Blanco, R.: Keyword search over RDF graphs. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 237–242. CIKM 2011. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2063576.2063615

  11. Fu, Y., Schneider, J.: Towards knowledge maintenance in scientific digital libraries with the keystone framework. In: Huang, R., Wu, D., Marchionini, G., He, D., Cunningham, S.J., Hansen, P. (eds.) JCDL 2020: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, Virtual Event, China, 1–5 August 2020, pp. 217–226. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.3398514

  12. Gandrabur, S., Foster, G.F., Lapalme, G.: Confidence estimation for NLP applications. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process. 3(3), 1–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1177055.1177057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Group, W.W.: PROV-overview. an overview of the PROV family of documents (2013). https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/

  14. Guo, Z., Schlichtkrull, M., Vlachos, A.: A survey on automated fact-checking. Trans. Assoc. Comp Linguist. (TACL) 10, 178–206 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han, S., Zou, L., Yu, J.X., Zhao, D.: Keyword search on RDF graphs - a query graph assembly approach. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 227–236. CIKM 2017. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132957

  16. Haslhofer, B., Isaac, A.: data.europeana.eu: the Europeana linked open data pilot. In: Baker, T., Hillmann, D.I., Isaac, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DC 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands, 21–23 September 2011, pp. 94–104. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2011). http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3625

  17. Jambeck, J.R., et al.: Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347(6223), 768–771 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaradeh, M.Y., et al.: Open research knowledge graph: Next generation infrastructure for semantic scholarly knowledge. In: Kejriwal, M., Szekely, P.A., Troncy, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2019, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA, 19–21 November 2019, pp. 243–246. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3360901.3364435

  19. Jin, Q., et al.: Biomedical question answering: a survey of approaches and challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. 55(2), 1–36 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3490238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khot, T., Sabharwal, A., Clark, P.: Answering complex questions using open information extraction. In: Barzilay, R., Kan, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2017, Vancouver, Canada, 30 July – 4 August, Volume 2: Short Papers, pp. 311–316. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-2049

  21. Kilicoglu, H., Shin, D., Fiszman, M., Rosemblat, G., Rindflesch, T.C.: SemMedDB: a PubMed-scale repository of biomedical semantic predications. Bioinformatics 28(23), 3158–3160 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kroll, H., Kalo, J.-C., Nagel, D., Mennicke, S., Balke, W.-T.: Context-compatible information fusion for scientific knowledge graphs. In: Hall, M., Merčun, T., Risse, T., Duchateau, F. (eds.) TPDL 2020. LNCS, vol. 12246, pp. 33–47. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54956-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kroll, H., Nagel, D., Balke, W.-T.: Modeling narrative structures in logical overlays on top of knowledge repositories. In: Dobbie, G., Frank, U., Kappel, G., Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER 2020. LNCS, vol. 12400, pp. 250–260. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Kroll, H., Nagel, D., Kunz, M., Balke, W.: Demonstrating narrative bindings: linking discourses to knowledge repositories. In: Campos, R., Jorge, A.M., Jatowt, A., Bhatia, S., Finlayson, M.A. (eds.) Proceedings of Text2Story - Fourth Workshop on Narrative Extraction From Texts held in conjunction with the 43rd European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2021), Lucca, Italy, 1 April 2021 (online event due to COVID-19 outbreak). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2860, pp. 57–63. CEUR-WS.org (2021). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2860/paper7.pdf

  25. Kroll, H., Pirklbauer, J., Kalo, J.-C., Kunz, M., Ruthmann, J., Balke, W.-T.: Narrative query graphs for entity-interaction-aware document retrieval. In: Ke, H.-R., Lee, C.S., Sugiyama, K. (eds.) ICADL 2021. LNCS, vol. 13133, pp. 80–95. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91669-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Kroll, H., Plötzky, F., Pirklbauer, J., Balke, W.: What a publication tells you - benefits of narrative information access in digital libraries. CoRR (Accepted to JCDL2022) abs/2205.00718 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.00718

  27. Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D.: PROV-O: The PROV Ontology (2013). https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/

  28. NASA: Global Temperature | Vital Signs - NASA Climate Change. https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/. Accessed 25 May 2022

  29. Nickerson, R.S.: Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2(2), 175–220 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rhodes, C.J.: Plastic pollution and potential solutions. Sci. Prog. 101, 207–260 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ritchie, H., Roser, M.: Forests and deforestation. Our World in Data (2021). https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation

  32. Uscinski, J.E., Butler, R.W.: The epistemology of fact checking. Crit. Rev. 25(2), 162–180 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weikum, G., Dong, X.L., Razniewski, S., Suchanek, F.M.: Machine knowledge: creation and curation of comprehensive knowledge bases. Found. Trends Databases 10(2–4), 108–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1561/1900000064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams, A., Rangel-Buitrago, N.: Marine litter: solutions for a major environmental problem. J. Coast. Res. 35(3), 648–663 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-18-00096.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao, C., Xiong, C., Qian, X., Boyd-Graber, J.L.: Complex factoid question answering with a free-text knowledge graph. In: Huang, Y., King, I., Liu, T., van Steen, M. (eds.) WWW 2020: The Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan, 20–24 April 2020, pp. 1205–1216. ACM/IW3C2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380197

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Kroll .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kroll, H., Mainzer, N., Balke, WT. (2022). On Dimensions of Plausibility for Narrative Information Access to Digital Libraries. In: Silvello, G., et al. Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16801-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16802-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics