Abstract
Scholarly repositories are the cornerstone of modern open science, and their availability is vital for enacting its practices. To this end, scholarly registries such as FAIRsharing, re3data, OpenDOAR and ROAR give them presence and visibility across different research communities, disciplines, and applications by assigning an identifier and persisting their profiles with summary metadata. Alas, like any other resource available on the Web, scholarly repositories, be they tailored for literature, software or data, are quite dynamic and can be frequently changed, moved, merged or discontinued. Therefore, their references are prone to link rot over time, and their availability often boils down to whether the homepage URLs indicated in authoritative repository profiles within scholarly registries respond or not.
For this study, we harvested the content of four prominent scholarly registries and resolved over 13 thousand unique repository URLs. By performing a quantitative analysis on such an extensive collection of repositories, this paper aims to provide a global snapshot of their availability, which bewilderingly is far from granted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
FAIRsharing – https://fairsharing.org.
- 2.
re3data – https://re3data.org.
- 3.
OpenDOAR – https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/opendoar.
- 4.
- 5.
http://brage.bibsys.no/hia/ {ks, hig, hiak, politihs, hsf, hive, misjon, hinesna, hvo, hibo, histm, dhh, hint, hibu, bdh}.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Selenium WebDriver – https://www.selenium.dev.
References
Bar-Yossef, Z., Broder, A.Z., Kumar, R., Tomkins, A.: Sic transit gloria telae: Towards an understanding of the web’s decay. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on World Wide Web - WWW 2004, p. 328. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/988672.988716
Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H.: Estimating frequency of change. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 3(3), 256–290 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/857166.857170
Fielding, R., Reschke, J.: Hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP/1.1): semantics and content (2014)
Jones, S.M., de Sompel, H.V., Shankar, H., Klein, M., Tobin, R., Grover, C.: Scholarly context adrift: three out of four URI references lead to changed content. PLoS One 11(12), e0167475 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167475
Klein, Martin, Balakireva, Lyudmila: On the persistence of persistent identifiers of the scholarly web. In: Hall, Mark, Merčun, Tanja, Risse, Thomas, Duchateau, Fabien (eds.) TPDL 2020. LNCS, vol. 12246, pp. 102–115. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54956-5_8
Klein, M., Balakireva, L.: An extended analysis of the persistence of persistent identifiers of the scholarly web. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 23(1), 5–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-021-00315-w
Klein, M., Balakireva, L., Shankar, H.: Who is asking? humans and machines experience a different scholarly web. In: 16th International Conference on Digital Preservation. Open Science Framework, Amsterdam (2019). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SMCY2
Klein, M., et al.: Scholarly context not found: one in five articles suffers from reference rot. PLoS One 9(12), e115253 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115253
Lawrence, S., et al.: Persistence of web references in scientific research. Computer 34(2), 26–31 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/2.901164
Mannocci, A.: Analysis of scholarly repositories’ availability. Data and notebooks (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6906885
Pampel, H., et al.: Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org registry. PLOS One 8(11), e78080 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
Sansone, S.A., et al.: FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. Nat. Biotechnol. 37(4), 358–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by the EC H2020 OpenAIRE-Nexus (Grant agreement 101017452).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mannocci, A., Baglioni, M., Manghi, P. (2022). “Knock Knock! Who’s There?” A Study on Scholarly Repositories’ Availability. In: Silvello, G., et al. Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16801-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16802-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)