Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Evaluating a Visual Mobile Banking App for Users with Low Subjective Numeracy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP-AAATE 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13342))

Abstract

Financial well-being is one of the many aspects of life affected by low numeracy. Digital banking interactions use numerically symbolic-based interactions. However, one of the critical learning difficulties often associated with low numeracy, a magnitude-processing deficit, is directly impaired by associating symbolic numbers with their equivalent magnitude. Using a user-centered design process, a visual financial management system was created. It was then tested with 40 participants of various reported subjective numeracy scores. The visual system was designed using a visual representation of money instead of a traditional application, which is purely symbolic-based. The study results indicated that the interactive visual system was the preferred design compared to the symbolic system for the lower subjective numeracy group. Furthermore, it also improved financial awareness and consideration across all ranges of numeracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skills for Life 2011, PIAAC 2014, National Numeracy YouGov Survey 2014: Low levels of numeracy are a long-term problem for the UK. National Numeracy YouGov Survey 2014(2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD: Skills Matter: Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. OECD: Literacy, Numeracy and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments: Framework for the OECD Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Publishing (2012). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264128859-en

  4. Lister, J.: The impact of poor numeracy skills on adults, research review. Prepared for NIACE by the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NRDC) at the Institute of Education (IOE), University of London, June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grotlüschen, A., Mallows, D., Reder, S., Sabtini, J.: Adults with low proficiency in literacy or numeracy. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 131. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ofsted: Tackling the challenge of low numeracy skills in young people and adults (100225). The Office for Students in Eductation, Children’s services and Skills, Manchester (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butterworth, B., Laurillard, D.: Low numeracy and dyscalculia: identification and intervention. ZDM 42, 527–539 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shalev, R.S.: Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. In: Berch, D.B., Mazzocco, M.M. (eds.) Why is Math So Hard for Some Children? The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Learning Difficulties and Disabilities, pp. 49–60. Paul H. Brooks Publishing, Baltimore (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szucs, D., Devine, A., Soltesz, F., Nobes, A., Gabriela, F.: Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex 49(10), 2674–2688 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morsanyi, K., Bers, B.M., O’Connor, P.A., McCormack, T.: Developmental dyscalculia is characterized by order processing deficits: evidence from numerical and non-numerical ordering tasks. Dev. Neuropsychol. 43(7), 595–621 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M.M., Feigenson, L.: Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature 455, 665–668 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schelifer, P., Landerl, K.: Subitizing and counting in typical and atypical development. Dev. Sci. 14, 280–291 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Siemann, J., Petermann, F.: Innate or acquired? – disentangling number sense and early number competencies. Front. Psychol. 9, 571 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lipkus, I., Samsa, G., Rijmer, B.K.: General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med. Decis. Making 21(1), 37–44 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B.J., Ubel, P.A., Jankovic, A., Derry, H.A., Smith, D.M.: Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Med. Decis.Making 27, 672–680 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zikmund-Fisher, B.J., Smith, D.M., Ubel, P.A., Fagerlin, A.: Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med. Decis. Making 27(5), 663–671 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mera, C., Ruiz-Cagigas, G., Navarro-Guzmán, J. I., Aragón-Mendizábal, E., Delgado, C., Aguilar-Villagrán, M.: PP designed for early math training. Magnitudes Comparison. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Article 65, 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davies, D.K., Stock, S.E., Wehmeyer, M.L.: A palmtop computer-based intelligent aid to increase independent decision making. Res. Pract. Persons with Severe Disabil. 28(4), 182–193 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Usability.gov: User-Centered Design Basics (n.d.). Retrieved from Usability.gov: https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-centered-design.html. Accessed 3 Dec 2021

  20. Swan, H., Pouncey, I., Pickering, H., Watson, L. (n.d.) https://inclusivedesignprinciples.org/

  21. Gao, M., Kortum, P., Oswald, F.: Psychometric evaluation of the USE (usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use) questionnaire for reliability and validity. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1414–1418 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marian McDonnell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stewart, A., McDonnell, M. (2022). Evaluating a Visual Mobile Banking App for Users with Low Subjective Numeracy. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G., Mavrou, K., Manduchi, R., Covarrubias Rodriguez, M., Penáz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP-AAATE 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13342. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08645-8_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08644-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08645-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics