Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advancing the Advanced Search: Improving the Web of Science User Experience with a Spreadsheet Search Query Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 Posters (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1580))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis, or citation analysis, is used extensively to track the ebb and flow of research topics and disciplinary trends, evaluate publication performance, determine professional outcomes such as tenure and funding awards, and develop policy. Numerous tools exist to help visualize and explore bibliometric data from citation databases; however, good analytics require good data. Obtaining that data through a web browser interface can place the user in a search query bottleneck, limited by the site developer’s graphical search engine features. This paper describes a new spreadsheet tool, designed in Microsoft Excel, for use in conjunction with citation database front-end website search engines. Using Web of Science (WoS) as a proving ground, this tool improves the user experience by enhancing the Advanced Search parameter options beyond those displayed on the WoS website, offers better search query save options than WoS alone, and extending the WoS search history function with commenting features. It also opens new collaborative search opportunities with other users which can also benefit secondary research investigations like meta-analyses, building a shared experience for better performance, accountability, and replicability. Using Excel and a simple interface design, the tool is far more user accessible, making standard spreadsheet cell entries much easier than navigating complicated HTML elements. This paper shares a demonstration of the tool on a novel HCI bibliometric query and considers future developments for other spreadsheet software and citation databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alston, J.M., Rick, J.A.: A beginner’s guide to conducting reproducible research. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 102(2), e01801 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bratt, S., Hemsley, J., Qin, J., Costa, M.: Big data, big metadata and quantitative study of science: a workflow model for big scientometrics. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54(1), 36–45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, C., et al.: Visualizing the evolution of HCI. In: McEwan, T., Gulliksen, J., Benyon, D. (eds.) People and Computers XIX — The Bigger Picture, pp. 233–250. Springer, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_15

  4. Cho, Y., Park, H.J., Lim, H.: Research in user-centered design 2009 to 2018: a systematic keyword network analysis. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) HCII 2020. CCIS, vol. 1224, pp. 11–18. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarivate: Web of Science. https://www.webofscience.com

  6. Cobo, M.J., Dehdarirad, T., García-Sánchez, P., Moral-Munoz, J.A.: Quantifying the reproducibility of scientometric analyses: a case study. In: STI 2018 Conference Proceedings, pp. 925–933. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) (2018). https://hdl.handle.net/1887/65242

  7. Csomós, G.: On the challenges ahead of spatial scientometrics focusing on the city level. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 72(1), 67–87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2019-0152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartson, H.: Human-computer interaction: interdisciplinary roots and trends. J. Syst. Softw. 43(2), 103–118 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(98)10026-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janzen, S., Web of Science Product Support: Clarivate Analytics Case # CM-220118-5269326 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koumaditis, K., Hussain, T.: Human computer interaction research through the lens of a bibliometric analysis. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10271, pp. 23–37. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58071-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mannocci, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: The evolution of IJHCS and CHI: a quantitative analysis. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 131, 23–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall, J., Linehan, C., Spence, J., Rennick Egglestone, S.: Throwaway citation of prior work creates risk of bad HCI research. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2017, pp. 827–836. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3052751

  13. Mubin, O., Al Mahmud, A., Ahmad, M.: HCI down under: reflecting on a decade of the OzCHI conference. Scientometrics 112(1), 367–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2293-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Norris, S.: Bibliometrics and research evaluation: uses and abuses [book review]. J. Librarianship Sch. Commun. 7(1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2286

  15. Sandnes, F.E.: A bibliometric study of human–computer interaction research activity in the Nordic-Baltic Eight countries. Scientometrics 126(6), 4733–4767 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03940-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stephan, P., Veugelers, R., Wang, J.: Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics. Nature 544(7651), 411–412 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/544411a. https://www.nature.com/articles/544411a

  17. Wang, L.L., Mack, K., McDonnell, E.J., Jain, D., Findlater, L., Froehlich, J.E.: A bibliometric analysis of citation diversity in accessibility and HCI research. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, no. 448, pp. 1–7. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451618

  18. Zacharewicz, T., Lepori, B., Reale, E., Jonkers, K.: Performance-based research funding in EU member states-a comparative assessment. Sci. Public Policy 46(1), 105–115 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy041

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn Janzen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Janzen, S. (2022). Advancing the Advanced Search: Improving the Web of Science User Experience with a Spreadsheet Search Query Tool. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06416-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06417-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics