Abstract
UX is now an acknowledged business process across several industries. Having grown out of Human Factors, Human-Computer Interaction and Interaction Design, UX is increasingly witnessing scholarly attention outside these historical roots. However, this popularity of UX also seems to have caused a broadening of the UX concept – where several non-UX professional roles and perspectives now shape its meaning. This makes its relationship with interaction design more ambiguous and possibly more diluted, potentially widening the gap between UX as an academic focus and its associated professions. Therefore, we seek to empirically briefly explore how UX is treated in HCI textbooks, as well as current design-related job postings. To that end, a research-practice analysis was conducted based on a literature review and an empirical analysis of job postings for UX design-related professions.
Based on this limited study, we suggest that these multidisciplinary perspectives have transformed UX into a kind of placeholder for any ‘interaction’ experience, within the set of academic definitions and included job postings. Moreover, it becomes clear that within the scholarly HCI debate this transformation is accepted and fostered – as it borrows theories from other disciplines that are driving these different perspectives. To that end, it can be argued that UX has developed to be a holistic business perspective – rather than a product specific perspective – where a multitude of non-traditional UX-roles take part in a businesses’ UX efforts. Resulting from this development, we argue that UX nominally has become somewhat decoupled from its roots in the interaction design profession.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B.: The Most In-Demand Hard and Soft Skills of 2020 (2020). https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-strategy/linkedin-most-in-demand-hard-and-soft-skills. Accessed 7 Jan 2022
Canziba, E.: Hands-On UX Design for Developers: Design, Prototype, and Implement Compelling User Experiences From Scratch. Packt Publishing Ltd (2018)
Chow, L., Sajonas, S.: From UX study to UX service: using people-centered research methods to improve the public library experience. Public Lib. Quar. 39(6), 493–509 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2019.1682884
Christensen, S.Y., Dickinson, J., Machac, K., Cline, H.: Define UX design. In: 2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC), pp. 1–5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249146
Gray, C.M.: Evolution of design competence in UX practice. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1645–1654. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557264
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331
Interaction Design Foundation: What is User Experience (UX) design? In: The Interaction Design Foundation (n.d.). https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/ux-design. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
ISO DIS 9241-210: Ergonomics of human system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407). International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Switzerland (2008)
Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 719–728. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518813
Luther, L., Tiberius, V., Brem, A.: User Experience (UX) in business, management, and psychology: a bibliometric mapping of the current state of research. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 4(2), 18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4020018
Norman, D., Nielsen, J.: The Definition of User Experience (UX). In: Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/. Accessed 8 Jan 2022
Velt, R., Benford, S., Reeves, S.: Translations and boundaries in the gap between HCI theory and design practice. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 27(4), 29:1–29:28 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3386247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cosijn, O.J.M., Lahtinen, M. (2022). The UX Defined UX Designer Is No More. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06416-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06417-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)