Abstract
With the growing advances in the Internet of Things (IoT) technology, IoT device management platforms are becoming increasingly important. We conducted a web-based survey and usability study with 43 participants who use IoT devices frequently to: 1) examine their smart home IoT usage patterns and privacy preferences, and 2) evaluate a web-based prototype for smart home IoT device management. We found that participants perceived privacy as more important than the convenience afforded by the IoT devices. Based on their average scores of the privacy vs. convenience importance, participants with low privacy and low convenience significantly reported less privacy control and convenience preferences than participants with high privacy and high convenience. Overall, all participants were satisfied about the proposed website prototype and their actual usability evaluation demonstrated good understanding of the website features. This paper provides an empirical examination of the privacy versus convenience trade-offs smart home users make when managing their IoT devices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Living in a glass house. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2030112.2030118
Smart homes, comfort and data capture, January 2016. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/01/14/scenario-home-activities-comfort-and-data-capture/
Arabo, A., Brown, I., El-Moussa, F.: Privacy in the age of mobility and smart devices in smart homes. In: 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, pp. 819–826, September 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.108
Balliu, M., Bastys, I., Sabelfeld, A.: Securing IoT apps. IEEE Secur. Priv. 17(5), 22–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2019.2914190
Boeckl, K., et al.: Considerations for managing internet of things (IoT) cybersecurity and privacy risks. Technical report NIST IR 8228, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, June 2019. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8228, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2019/NIST.IR.8228.pdf
Clawson, J., Pater, J., Miller, A., Mynatt, E., Mamykina, L.: No longer wearing: investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist, pp. 647–658 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807554
Cronbach, L.J., Meehl, P.E.: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52(4), 281 (1955)
Dehury, C.K., Sahoo, P.K.: Design and implementation of a novel service management framework for IoT devices in cloud. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 149–161 (2016)
Delicato, F., Pires, P., Avila Barros, T., Batista, T., Costa, B.: A platform for integrating physical devices in the internet of things (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/EUC.2014.42
Epstein, D.A., Caraway, M., Johnston, C., Ping, A., Fogarty, J., Munson, S.A.: Beyond abandonment to next steps: understanding and designing for life after personal informatics tool use. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016, pp. 1109–1113. Association for Computing Machinery (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858045
Gupta, S.D., Kaplan, S., Nygaard, A., Ghanavati, S.: A two-fold study to investigate users’ perception of IoT information sensitivity levels and their willingness to share the information. In: Meng, W., Katsikas, S.K. (eds.) EISA 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 87–107. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93956-4_6
Hilton, A., Armstrong, R.A.: Statnote 6: post-hoc ANOVA tests. Microbiologist 2006, 34–36 (2006)
Jayaraman, P.P., Yang, X., Yavari, A., Georgakopoulos, D., Yi, X.: Privacy preserving internet of things: from privacy techniques to a blueprint architecture and efficient implementation. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 76, 540–549 (2017)
Kröger, J.L., Gellrich, L., Pape, S., Brause, S.R., Ullrich, S.:Personal information inference from voice recordings: user awareness and privacy concerns. Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2022(1), 6–27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2022-0002, https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/popets-2022-0002
Kunal, D., Tushar, D., Pooja, U., Vaibhav, Z., Lodha, V.: Smart home automation using IoT. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 5(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.17148/IJARCCE.2016.52131
Lau, J., Zimmerman, B., Schaub, F.: Alexa, are you listening? Privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2(CSCW), 102:1–102:31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274371
Martin, C.: Smart home technology hits 69% penetration in U.S. https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/341320/smart-home-technology-hits-69-penetration-in-us.html
McCreary, F., Zafiroglu, A., Patterson, H.: The contextual complexity of privacy in smart homes and smart buildings. In: Nah, F.F.-H.F.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9752, pp. 67–78. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_7
Molla, R.: People say they care about privacy but they continue to buy devices that can spy on them, May 2019. https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/5/13/18547235/trust-smart-devices-privacy-security
Naeini, P.E., et al.: Privacy expectations and preferences in an IoT world, pp. 399–412 (2017). https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2017/technical-sessions/presentation/naeini
Page, X., Bahirat, P., Safi, M.I., Knijnenburg, B.P., Wisniewski, P.: The internet of what? Understanding differences in perceptions and adoption for the internet of things 2(4), 183:1–183:22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287061
Piyare, R., Tazil, M.: Bluetooth based home automation system using cell phone. In: 2011 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE), pp. 192–195, June 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCE.2011.5973811. iSSN 2159-1423
Saeidi, M., Calvert, M., Au, A.W., Sarma, A., Bobba, R.B.: If this then that: exploring users’ concerns with IFTTT applets. Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2022(1), 166–186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2022-0009, https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/popets-2022-0009
Shrestha, B., Mali, S., Joseph, A., Singh, K.J.: Web and android based automation using IoT, p. 4 (2017)
Silva, J.D.C., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., Saleem, K., Kozlov, S.A., Rabelo, R.A.L.: M4DN.IoT-a networks and devices management platform for internet of things. IEEE Access 7, 53305–53313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909436, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8681396/
St, L., Wold, S., et al.: Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 6(4), 259–272 (1989)
Tabassum, M., Kropczynski, J., Wisniewski, P., Lipford, H.R.: Smart home beyond the home: a case for community-based access control. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, April 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376255
Weinberg, B.D., Milne, G.R., Andonova, Y.G., Hajjat, F.M.: Internet of things: Convenience vs. privacy and secrecy. Bus. Horiz. 58(6), 615–624 (2015)
Wisniewski, P., Safi, M.I., Patil, S., Page, X.: Predicting smartphone location-sharing decisions through self-reflection on past privacy behavior. J. Cybersecur. 6(1), tyaa014 (2020)
Zhang, P., Vasilakos, A.: A survey on trust management for internet of things. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 42, 120–134 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.014
Zheng, S., Apthorpe, N., Chetty, M., Feamster, N.: User perceptions of smart home IoT privacy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2(CSCW), 200:1–200:20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274469
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alghamdi, L., Alsoubai, A., Akter, M., Alghamdi, F., Wisniewski, P. (2022). A User Study to Evaluate a Web-Based Prototype for Smart Home Internet of Things Device Management. In: Moallem, A. (eds) HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13333. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05563-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05563-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05562-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05563-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)