Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Ensembles for Rumor Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13315))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2031 Accesses

Abstract

Rumor detection is a recent and quite active topic of multidisciplinary research due to its evident impact on society, which can even result in physical harm to people. Despite its broad definition and scope, most existing research focuses on Twitter, as it makes the problem a bit more tractable from the point of view of information gathering, processing, and further retrieval of social network features. This paper presents an empirical study of novel machine learning ensembles for the rumor classification task on Twitter. As it has been observed that certain neural models perform better for specific veracity labels, we present a study on how the combination of such classifiers in different kinds of ensemble results in a new classifier that has better performance. Using benchmark data, we evaluate three groups of models (two groups of deep neural networks and a control group of classical machine learning methods). In addition, we study the performance of three ensemble strategies: Bagging, Stacking, and Simple Soft Voting. After varying several parameters of the models, such as the number of hidden units and dropout, among others experimental factors, our study shows that the LSTM, Stacked LSTM (S-LSTM), Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks (RCNN), and Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (Bi-GRU) yields the best results reaching an accuracy of 0.93 and an average precision of 0.97.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal, A., Dixit, A.: Fake news detection: an ensemble learning approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems, ICICCS 2020, pp. 1178–1183 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, I., Yousaf, M., Yousaf, S., Ahmad, M.: Fake news detection using machine learning ensemble methods. Complexity 2020, 8885861:1–8885861:11 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akhter, M., Zheng, J., Afzal, F., Lin, H., Riaz, A., Mehmood, S.: Supervised ensemble learning methods towards automatically filtering Urdu fake news within social media. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 7, 1–24 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Rakhami, M., Al-Amri, A.: Lies kill, facts save: detecting COVID-19 misinformation in Twitter. IEEE Access 8, 155961–155970 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2), 123–140 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, Hyderabad, India, pp. 675–684. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong, S., Qian, Z., Li, P., Zhu, X., Zhu, Q.: Rumor detection on hierarchical attention network with user and sentiment information. In: Zhu, X., Zhang, M., Hong, Yu., He, R. (eds.) NLPCC 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12431, pp. 366–377. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60457-8_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt, K., Agarwal, P., Zhuang, J.: Monitoring misinformation on Twitter during crisis events: a machine learning approach. Risk Anal. 2020, (Early View) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaur, S., Kumar, P., Kumaraguru, P.: Automating fake news detection system using multi-level voting model. Soft. Comput. 24(12), 9049–9069 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04436-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, Y., Kim, H., Kim, H., Hong, J.: Do many models make light work? Evaluating ensemble solutions for improved rumor detection. IEEE Access 8, 150709–150724 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotteti, C., Dong, X., Qian, L.: Ensemble deep learning on time-series representation of tweets for rumor detection in social media. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland) 10(21), 1–21 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, S., Asthana, R., Upadhyay, S., Upreti, N., Akbar, M.: Fake news detection using deep learning models: a novel approach. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 31(2), e3767 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, H., Zhang, X., Fu, X.: A graph convolutional encoder and decoder model for rumor detection. In: 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), pp. 300–306 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ma, J., Gao, W., Wong, K.-F.: Detect rumors in microblog posts using propagation structure via kernel learning. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 708–717, July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  15. Malhotra, B., Vishwakarma, D.: Classification of propagation path and tweets for rumor detection using graphical convolutional networks and transformer based encodings. In: Proceedings - 2020 IEEE 6th International Conference on Multimedia Big Data, BigMM 2020, pp. 183–190 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mendoza, M.: A new term-weighting scheme for Naïve Bayes text categorization. Int. J. Web Inf. Syst. 8(1), 55–72 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013. Proceedings of a Meeting held Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States, 5–8 December 2013, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Providel, E., Mendoza, M.: Using deep learning to detect rumors in Twitter. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12194, pp. 321–334. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_22

  19. Providel, E., Mendoza, M.: Misleading information in Spanish: a survey. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11(1), 36 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tian, L., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, H.: Early detection of rumours on Twitter via stance transfer learning. In: Jose, J.M., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2020. LNCS, vol. 12035, pp. 575–588. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45439-5_38

  21. Ting, K., Witten, I.: Stacking bagged and dagged models. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 1997, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 367–375. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vijeev, A., Mahapatra, A., Shyamkrishna, A., Murthy, S.: A hybrid approach to rumour detection in microblogging platforms. In: 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, ICACCI 2018, pp. 337–342 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vu, D.T., Jung, J.J.: Rumor detection by propagation embedding based on graph convolutional network. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 14, 1053–1065 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, X., Ghorbani, A.: An overview of online fake news: characterization, detection, and discussion. Inf. Process. Manag. 57(2), 102025 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, Z.-H.: Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., Procter, R.: Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(2), 1–36 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Hoi, G.W.S., Tolmie, P.: Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PLoS ONE 11(3), e0150989 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mr. Mendoza acknowledges funding from the Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data. Mr. Mendoza was also funded by grants ANID BASAL FB210017 and ANID FONDECYT 1200211.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliana Providel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zapata, A., Providel, E., Mendoza, M. (2022). Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Ensembles for Rumor Detection. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05060-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05061-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics