Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Sniff Before You Act: Exploration of Scent-Feature Associations for Designing Future Interactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 (INTERACT 2021)

Abstract

It has long been known that our sense of smell is a powerful one that affects emotions and behaviors. Recently, interest in the sense of smell has been growing exponentially in HCI. However, the potential of smell to inspire design is still underexplored. In this paper, we first investigated crossmodal correspondences between scents and selected features relevant for design (clustered in sensory, bodily, and qualitative features). Then, we created a set of cards (EssCards) to visually summarize the key findings to inspire designers. We carried out two preliminary design exploration sessions using the EssCards. Based on our findings, we discuss how to inspire and challenge design opportunities around the sense of smell and reflect upon applications for smell as inspirational material for designing future interactions and experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amores, J., Hernandez, J., Dementyev, A., Wang, X., Maes, P.: Bioessence: a wearable olfactory display that monitors cardio-respiratory information to support mental wellbeing. In: 2018 Conference in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 5131–5134. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amores, J., Maes, P.: Essence: olfactory interfaces for unconscious influence of mood and cognitive performance. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 28–34 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett and H: https://www.hollandandbarrett.com/

  4. Barwich, A.-S.: Smellosophy: What the Nose tells the Mind. Harvard Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belkin, K., Martin, R., Kemp, S.E., Gilbert, A.N.: Auditory pitch as a perceptual analogue to odor quality. Psychol. Sci. (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00450.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bensafi, M., Rouby, C., Farget, V., Bertrand, B., Vigouroux, M., Holley, A.: Autonomic nervous system responses to odours: the role of pleasantness and arousal. Chem. Senses 27(8), 703–709 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/27.8.703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonanni, L., Vaucelle, C., Lieberman, J., Zuckerman, O.: TapTap: a haptic wearable for asynchronous distributed touch therapy. CHI’06 Extended Abstracts. pp. 580–585 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bornoe, N., Bruun, A., Stage, J.: Facilitating redesign with design cards: experiences with novice designers. In: Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brianza, G., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Maggioni, E., Pittera, D., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Obrist, M.: As light as your scent: effects of smell and sound on body image perception. In: Lamas, D., Loizides, F., Nacke, L., Petrie, H., Winckler, M., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) INTERACT 2019. LNCS, vol. 11749, pp. 179–202. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29390-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Caon, M., Angelini, L., Abou Khaled, O., Mugellini, E., Matassa, A.: Towards multisensory storming. ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crisinel, A.-S., Spence, C.: A fruity note: crossmodal associations between odors and musical notes. Chem. Senses (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjr085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Darzentas, D., et al.: Card mapper: enabling data-driven reflections on ideation cards. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Groot, J.H., Semin, G.R., Smeets, M.A.: I can see, hear, and smell your fear: comparing olfactory and audiovisual media in fear communication. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delplanque, S., Grandjean, D., Chrea, C., Aymard, L., Cayeux, I., Le Calve, B., et al.: Emotional processing of odors: evidence for a nonlinear relation between pleasantness and familiarity evaluations. Chem. Senses (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dematte, M.L., Sanabria, D., Sugarman, R., Spence, C.: Cross-modal interactions between olfaction and touch. Chem. Senses (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjj031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deng, Y., Antle, A.N., Neustaedter, C.: Tango cards: a card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, pp. 695–704 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Distel, H., Ayabe-Kanamura, S., Martínez-Gómez, M., Schicker, I., Kobayakawa, T., Saito, S., et al.: Perception of everyday odors—correlation between intensity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem. Senses (1999). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/24.2.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dmitrenko, D., Maggioni, E., Brianza, G., Holthausen, B.E., Walker, B.N., Obrist, M.: Caroma therapy: pleasant scents promote safer driving, better mood, and improved well-being in angry drivers. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ehrlichman, H., Bastone, L.: Olfaction and emotion. In: Serby, M.J., Chobor, K.L. (eds.) Science of olfaction, pp. 410–438. Springer New York, New York, NY (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2836-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Engen, T., Ross, B.M.: Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions. J. Exp. Psychol. (1973). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrara, M.: Smart Experience in Fashion Design: A Speculative Analysis of Smart Material Systems Applications. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Arts (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Halskov, K., Dalsgård, P.: Inspiration card workshops. Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hanson-Vaux, G., Crisinel, A.-S., Spence, C.: Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes. Chem. Senses (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjs087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herz, R.S., Cupchik, G.C.: The emotional distinctiveness of odor-evoked memories. Chem. Senses (1995). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/20.5.517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hornecker, E.: Creative idea exploration within the structure of a guiding framework: the card brainstorming game. In: Conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, pp. 101–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jezler, O., Gatti, E., Gilardi, M., Obrist, M.: Scented material: changing features of physical creations based on odors. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1677–1683 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaeppler, K.: Crossmodal associations between olfaction and vision: color and shape visualizations of odors. Chemosens. Percept. 11(2), 95–111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-018-9245-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Keller, A.: Attention and olfactory consciousness. Front. Psychol. (2011). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kilteni, K., Normand, J.-M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Slater, M.: Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: a very long arm illusion. PLoS ONE (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kortum P. HCI beyond the GUI: Design for Haptic, Speech, Olfactory, and Other Nontraditional Interfaces. Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Krishna, A., Elder, R.S., Caldara, C.: Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience. J. Consum. Psychol. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee, J.: Design for all 5 senses. TED Talk (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lucero, A., Arrasvuori, J.: PLEX Cards: a source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. In: International Conference on Fun and Games, pp. 28–37 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maggioni, E., Cobden, R., Dmitrenko, D., Hornbæk, K., Obrist, M.: SMELL SPACE: mapping out the olfactory design space for novel interactions. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3402449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Metatla, O., Maggioni, E., Cullen, C., Obrist, M.: “Like Popcorn" crossmodal correspondences between scents, 3D shapes and emotions in children. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Motomura, N., Sakurai, A., Yotsuya, Y.: Reduction of mental stress with lavender odorant. Percept. Mot. Skills (2001). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2001.93.3.713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mueller, F., Gibbs, M.R., Vetere, F., Edge, D.: Supporting the creative game design process with exertion cards. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2211–2220 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nordin, S., Brämerson, A., Murphy, C., Bende, M.: A Scandinavian adaptation of the Multi-Clinic Smell and Taste Questionnaire: evaluation of questions about olfaction. Acta Otolaryngol. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480310001411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Obrist, M., Ranasinghe, N., Spence, C.: Multisensory human–computer interaction. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Obrist, M., Tuch, A.N., Hornbaek, K.: Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2843–2852 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Porter, J., Craven, B., Khan, R.M., Chang, S.-J., Kang, I., Judkewitz, B., et al.: Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans. Nat. Neurosci. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rinaldi, L., Maggioni, E., Olivero, N., Maravita, A., Girelli, L.: Smelling the space around us: odor pleasantness shifts visuospatial attention in humans. Emotion (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Root, E., Heuten, W., Boll, S.: Maker Cards: Evaluating design cards for teaching physical computing to middle-school girls. Proc. Mensch Comput. 2019, 493–497 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Royet, J.-P., Koenig, O., Gregoire, M.-C., Cinotti, L., Lavenne, F., Bars, D.L., et al.: Functional anatomy of perceptual and semantic processing for odors. J. Cogn. Neurosci. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schifferstein, H.N.: Multi sensory design. In: Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, pp. 361–362 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schifferstein, H.N.: The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shepherd, G.M.: The human sense of smell: are we better than we think? PLoS Biol. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sheskin, D.J.: Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. CRC Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shukla, A.: The Kiki-Bouba paradigm: where senses meet and greet. Indian J. Mental Health (2016). https://doi.org/10.30877/IJMH.3.3.2016.240-252.

  51. Spence, C., Parise, C.V.: The cognitive neuroscience of crossmodal correspondences. i-Perception (2012). https://doi.org/10.1068/i0540ic.

  52. Stevenson, R.J., Rich, A., Russell, A.: The nature and origin of cross-modal associations to odours. Perception (2012). https://doi.org/10.1068/p7223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sulmont, C., Issanchou, S., Köster, E.: Selection of odorants for memory tests on the basis of familiarity, perceived complexity, pleasantness, similarity and identification. Chem. Senses 27(4), 307–317 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/27.4.307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Trimmer, C., Mainland, J.: The Olfactory System. Conn's Translational Neuroscience. Elsevier (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Van Doorn, G., Woods, A., Levitan, C.A., Wan, X., Velasco, C., Bernal-Torres, C., et al.: Does the shape of a cup influence coffee taste expectations? a cross-cultural, online study. Food Qual. Prefer. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Von Hornbostel, E.M.: The unity of the senses. Psyche (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  57. von Radziewsky, L., Krüger, A., Löchtefeld, M.: Scarfy: augmenting human fashion behaviour with self-actuated clothes. Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 313–316 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wang, Y., Amores, J., Maes, P.: On-face olfactory interfaces. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, pp. 1–9 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Warrenburg, S.: Effects of fragrance on emotions: moods and physiology. Chem. Senses (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Windlin, C., Ståhl, A., Sanches, P., Tsaknaki, V., Karpashevich, P., Balaam, M., et al. Soma bits-mediating technology to orchestrate bodily experiences. In: RTD 2019-Research through Design Conference 2019, the Science Centre, Delft, on 19th to 22nd March 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wnuk, E., De Valk, J.M., Huisman, J.L., Majid, A.: Hot and cold smells: odor-temperature associations across cultures. Front. Psychol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wölfel, C., Merritt, T.: Method card design dimensions: a survey of card-based design tools. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8117, pp. 479–486. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Wright, P., Wallace, J., McCarthy, J.: Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Research Council - ERC (grant number 638605). We would like to thank the participants and designers who took part in our research. Special thanks go to Dr Emeline Brule and Jesse Jesse Benjamin for providing valuable feedback on early drafts of our paper, and Rhiannon Armitage for the voice-over on our video.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Giada Brianza , Patricia Cornelio , Emanuela Maggioni or Marianna Obrist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 38255 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 126134 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brianza, G., Cornelio, P., Maggioni, E., Obrist, M. (2021). Sniff Before You Act: Exploration of Scent-Feature Associations for Designing Future Interactions. In: Ardito, C., et al. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021. INTERACT 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12933. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85615-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85616-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics