Dealing with Privacy for Protecting Information

1. The European Parliament and of the Council: Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (2016). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679

2. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Guide to Protecting the Confidentiality of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-122.pdf

3. Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., Fernandez‐Gauna, B.: Managing security debt across PLC phases in a VSE context. J. Softw.: Evol. Process (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2214

4. Hicken, A.: Using static analysis to achieve “secure-by-design” for GDPR. https://blog.parasoft.com/using-static-analysis-to-security-design-in-gdpr. Accessed 23 Apr 2020

5. Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Assessing source code vulnerabilities in a cloud-based system for health systems: OpenNCP. IET Softw. 13, 195–202 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5294

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Larrucea, X., Moffie, M., Asaf, S., Santamaria, I.: Towards a GDPR compliant way to secure European cross border Healthcare Industry 4.0. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 69, 103408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2019.103408

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. ENISA: Information exchange and communication - What to share. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/national-cyber-security-strategies/information-sharing/isacs-toolkit/tools/build/information-exchange-and-communication/what-to-share. Accessed 30 Dec 2020

8. Sanchez-Gordon, M.-L., de Amescua, A., O’Connor, R.V., Larrucea, X.: A standard-based framework to integrate software work in small settings. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 54, 162–175 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.11.009

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC TR 29110-1:2011. ISO/IEC (2011)

   Google Scholar 

10. Larrucea, X., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Laporte, C.Y.: Software process improvement in very small organizations. IEEE Softw. 33, 85–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2016.42

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Larrucea, X., Fernandez-Gauna, B.: A mapping study about the standard ISO/IEC29110. Comput. Stand. Interfaces (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2019.03.005

12. Larrucea, X., Santamaría, I.: Correlations study and clustering from SPI experiences in small settings. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 31(1), e1989 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I.: Survival studies based on ISO/IEC29110: industrial experiences. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 60, 73–79 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Mesquida, A.-L., Mas, A.: A project management improvement program according to ISO/IEC 29110 and PMBOK (R). J. Softw.-Evol. Process 26, 846–854 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: Myths and fallacies of “personally identifiable information.” Commun. ACM 53, 24–26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1743546.1743558

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Sweeney, L.: k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzz. Knowl.-Based Syst. 10, 557–570 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488502001648

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

17. Xiao, X.: Privacy Preserving Data Publishing (2008)

    Google Scholar 

18. Gkountouna, O., Angeli, S., Zigomitros, A., Terrovitis, M., Vassiliou, Y.: km-anonymity for continuous data using dynamic hierarchies. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J. (ed.) PSD 2014. LNCS, vol. 8744, pp. 156–169. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11257-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

19. LeFevre, K., DeWitt, D.J., Ramakrishnan, R.: Mondrian multidimensional k-anonymity. In: 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’06), p. 25. IEEE, Atlanta (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2006.101

20. Li, X., Zhou, Z.: A generalization model for multi-record privacy preservation. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11(7), 2899–2912 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01430-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Machanavajjhala, A., Kifer, D., Gehrke, J., Venkitasubramaniam, M.: L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1(1), 3 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1217299.1217302

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Li, N., Li, T., Venkatasubramanian, S.: t-Closeness: privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In: 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 106–115. IEEE, Istanbul (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2007.367856

23. Dwork, C.: Differential privacy. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4052, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11787006_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

24. Chen, S., Fu, A., Shen, J., Yu, S., Wang, H., Sun, H.: RNN-DP: a new differential privacy scheme base on recurrent neural network for dynamic trajectory privacy protection. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 168, 102736 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102736

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Sánchez, D., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Martínez, S., Soria-Comas, J.: Utility-preserving differentially private data releases via individual ranking microaggregation. Inf. Fus. 30, 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Friedman, A., Schuster, A.: Data mining with differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD ’10, p. 493. ACM Press, Washington, DC (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1835804.1835868

27. Chen, R., Mohammed, N., Fung, B., Desai, B., Xiong, L.: Publishing set-valued data via differential privacy. Proc. VLDB Endow. 4(11), 1087–1098 (2011). https://doi.org/10.14778/3402707.3402744

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Garfinkel, S., Abowd, J.M., Martindale, C.: Understanding database reconstruction attacks on public data. Commun. ACM 62, 46–53 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287287

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Wirth, R.: CRISP-DM: towards a standard process model for data mining. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Practical Application of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 29–39 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

30. Huber, S., Wiemer, H., Schneider, D., Ihlenfeldt, S.: DMME: data mining methodology for engineering applications – a holistic extension to the CRISP-DM model. Procedia CIRP. 79, 403–408 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Härting, R.-C., Sprengel, A.: Cost-benefit considerations for data analytics - an SME-oriented framework enhanced by a management perspective and the process of idea generation. Procedia Comput. Sci. 159, 1537–1546 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.324

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., Smith, A.: Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In: Halevi, S., Rabin, T. (eds.) TCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3876, pp. 265–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11681878_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

33. Rodríguez-Barroso, N., et al.: Federated learning and differential privacy: software tools analysis, the Sherpa.ai FL framework and methodological guidelines for preserving data privacy. Inf. Fus. 64, 270–292 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.07.009

34. Rubinstein, B.I.P., Aldà, F.: Pain-free random differential privacy with sensitivity sampling. arXiv:1706.02562 [cs, stat] (2017)

35. Johnson, C.S., Badger, M.L., Waltermire, D.A., Snyder, J., Skorupka, C.: Guide to cyber threat information sharing. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2016). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-150

Download references