Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Spatial Model Checking for Smart Stations

Research Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS 2021)

Abstract

In this position paper, we discuss the introduction of spatial verification techniques in an application scenario from smart stations, viz. analysing the user experience with respect to the lighting conditions of station areas. This is a case study in industrial projects. We discuss three challenging use cases for the application of spatial model checking in this setting. First, we envision how to use the spatial model checker VoxLogicA, which can analyse both 2D and 3D voxel-based maps, to explore the areas that users can visit in a station area and to characterise them with respect to their illumination conditions. This is aimed at monitoring a smart station. We also ideate statistical spatio-temporal model checking of the design of energy-saving protocols, exploiting the modelling of user preferences. Finally, we discuss the idea of quantifying the impact of design changes, based on the logs of smart stations, to identify and measure the incidence of undesired events (e.g. non-illuminated platforms where a train is passing by) before and after each change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/andrea-vandin/MultiVeStA/wiki.

References

  1. Banci Buonamici, F., Belmonte, G., Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Spatial logics and model checking for medical imaging. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 22(2), 195–217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-019-00511-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banks, A., Gupta, R.: MQTT version 3.1.1. OASIS standard, October 2014. http://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/os/mqtt-v3.1.1-os.html

  3. Basile, D., ter Beek, M.H., Di Giandomenico, F., Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Spagnolo, G.O.: 30 years of simulation-based quantitative analysis tools: A comparison experiment between Möbius and Uppaal SMC. In: ISoLA. LNCS, vol. 12476, pp. 368–384. Springer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61362-4_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. ter Beek, M.H., Gnesi, S., Knapp, A.: Formal methods for transport systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 20(3), 355–358 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-018-0487-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belmonte, G., Broccia, G., Vincenzo, C., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Feasibility of spatial model checking for nevus segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormalieSE 2021), pp. 1–12. IEEE (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/FormaliSE52586.2021.00007

  6. Belmonte, G., Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Voxlogica: A spatial model checker for declarative image analysis. In: Vojnar, T., Zhang, L. (eds.) TACAS. LNCS, vol. 11427, pp. 281–298. Springer (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17462-0_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bezhanishvili, N., Ciancia, V., Gabelaia, D., Grilletti, G., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Geometric model checking of continuous space. http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.06194 [cs.LO], May 2021

  8. Broccia, G., Milazzo, P., Ölveczky, P.C.: Formal modeling and analysis of safety-critical human multitasking. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. 15(3–4), 169–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-019-00333-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bussi, L., Ciancia, V., Gadducci, F.: Towards a spatial model checker on GPU. In: Peters, K., Willemse, T. (eds.) FORTE. LNCS, vol. 12719, pp. 188–196. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78089-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ciancia, V., Gilmore, S., Grilletti, G., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: Spatio-temporal model checking of vehicular movement in public transport systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 20(3) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-018-0483-8

  11. Ciancia, V., Grilletti, G., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: An experimental spatio-temporal model checker. In: Bianculli, D., Calinescu, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) SEFM. LNCS, vol. 9509, pp. 297–311. Springer (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49224-6_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: Model checking spatial logics for closure spaces. Log. Methods Comput. Sci. 12(4) (2016). https://doi.org/10.2168/LMCS-12(4:2)2016

  13. Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: Specifying and verifying properties of space. In: Diaz, J., Lanese, I., Sangiorgi, D. (eds.) TCS. LNCS, vol. 8705, pp. 222–235. Springer (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44602-7_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M., Paškauskas, R.: Exploring spatio-temporal properties of bike-sharing systems. In: Workshops Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO 2015), pp. 74–79. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SASOW.2015.17

  15. Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M., Paškauskas, R., Vandin, A.: A tool-chain for statistical spatio-temporal model checking of bike sharing systems. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA. LNCS, vol. 9952, pp. 657–673. Springer (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47166-2_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Giandomenico, F., Gnesi, S., Spagnolo, G.O., Fantechi, A.: Smart services for railways. ERCIM News 117, 34–35 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fielding, R.T.: Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. Ph.D. thesis, University of California (2000). https://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/top.htm

  18. Gilmore, S., Reijsbergen, D., Vandin, A.: Transient and steady-state statistical analysis for discrete event simulators. In: Polikarpova, N., Schneider, S.A. (eds.) IFM. LNCS, vol. 10510, pp. 145–160. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66845-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Hänseler, F.S., van den Heuvel, J.P., Cats, O., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S.P.: A passenger-pedestrian model to assess platform and train usage from automated data. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 132, 948–968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai, X., Dai, M., Rameezdeen, R.: Energy saving based lighting system optimization and smart control solutions for rail transportation: evidence from China. Results Eng. 5, 100096 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Massink, M., Paškauskas, R.: Model-based assessment of aspects of user-satisfaction in bicycle sharing systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2015), pp. 1363–1370. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2015.224

  22. Sebastio, S., Vandin, A.: MultiVeStA: statistical model checking for discrete event simulators. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools (ValueTools 2013), pp. 310–315. ACM (2013). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.valuetools.2013.254377

  23. STINGRAY report: Algoritmi Innovativi. Deliverable D2.3.1, December 2020

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vandin, A., Giachini, D., Lamperti, F., Chiaromonte, F.: Automated and distributed statistical analysis of economic agent-based models. http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05405 [econ.GN], February 2021

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by the POR FESR 2014–2020 projects STINGRAY (SmarT station INtelliGent RAilwaY) and SmaRIERS (Smart Railway Infrastructures: Efficiency, Reliability and Safety), and by the MIUR PRIN 2017FTXR7S project IT MaTTerS (Methods and Tools for Trustworthy Smart Systems).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurice H. ter Beek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

ter Beek, M.H., Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M., Spagnolo, G.O. (2021). Spatial Model Checking for Smart Stations. In: Lluch Lafuente, A., Mavridou, A. (eds) Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems. FMICS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12863. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85248-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85248-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85247-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85248-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics