Using a Semantic-Based Support System for Merging Knowledge from Process Participants

1. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., et al.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4

2. Vaisman, A.: An introduction to business process modeling. In: Aufaure, M.-A., Zimányi, E. (eds.) eBISS. LNBIP, vol. 138, pp. 29–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36318-4_2

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

3. Indulska, M., Green, P., Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: Business process modeling: perceived benefits. In: Laender, A.H.F., Castano, S., Dayal, U., Casati, F., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009, pp. 458–471. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

4. Darai, D., Singh, S., Biswas, S.: Knowledge engineering-an overview. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 1(4), 230–234 (2010)

   Google Scholar 

5. Kendal, S., Creen, M.: An Introduction to Knowledge Engineering. Springer, London (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-667-4

6. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. International Computer Science Series. Pearson, New York (2011)

   Google Scholar 

7. Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Pawłowski, W., Szmeja, P., Wasielewska, K.: Towards semantic interoperability between internet of things platforms. In: Gravina, R., Palau, C.E., Manso, M., Liotta, A., Fortino, G. (eds.) Integration, interconnection, and interoperability of IoT systems. IT, pp. 103–127. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61300-0_6

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

8. Friedrich, F., Mendling, J., Puhlmann, F.: Process model generation from natural language text. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_36

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Kluza, K., Wiśniewski, P.: Spreadsheet-based business process modeling. In: 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 1355–1358. IEEE (2016)

   Google Scholar 

10. Kluza, K., Kagan, M., Wisniewski, P., Adrian, W.T., Ligeza, A.: Semantic-based support system for merging process knowledge from users. In: Mercier-Laurent, E., Owoc, M.L., Ritter, W. (eds.) AI4KM 2019: 7th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management, Macao, China, 11 August 2019, pp. 56–61 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

11. Wiśniewski, P., Kluza, K., Kucharska, E., Ligęza, A.: Spreadsheets as interoperability solution for business process representation. Appl. Sci. 9(2), 345 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Nalepa, G.J., Wojnicki, I.: Towards formalization of ARD+ conceptual design and refinement method. In: Wilson, D.C., Lane, H.C. (eds.) FLAIRS-21: Proceedings of the twenty-first international Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Coconut Grove, Florida, USA, 15–17 May 2008, pp. 353–358. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

13. Kluza, K., Wiśniewski, P., Adrian, W., Ligęza, A.: From attribute relationship diagrams to process (BPMN) and decision (DMN) models. In: Douligeris, C., Karagiannis, D., Apostolou, D. (eds.) KSEM 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11775, pp. 615–627. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

14. Shaw, M.L.G., Gaines, B.R.: Requirements acquisition. Softw. Eng. J. 11, 149–165 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Owoc, M.L., et al.: Benefits of knowledge acquisition systems for management. an empirical study. In: 2015 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 1691–1698. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

16. Honkisz, K., Kluza, K., Wiśniewski, P.: A concept for generating business process models from natural language description. In: Liu, W., Giunchiglia, F., Yang, B. (eds.) KSEM 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11061, pp. 91–103. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99365-2_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

17. Welbank, M.: An overview of knowledge acquisition methods. Interact. Comput. 2(1), 83–91 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Olson, J.R., Rueter, H.H.: Extracting expertise from experts: methods for knowledge acquisition. Expert syst. 4(3), 152–168 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. White, G.R., Cicmil, S.: Knowledge acquisition through process mapping. Int. J. Prod. Perf. Manage. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

20. Silva, I., Sousa, P., Guerreiro, S.: Business processes compliance in partially observable environments. Technical report, EasyChair (2019)

    Google Scholar 

21. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Mendling, J.: Configurable multi-perspective business process models. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 313–340 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W.M., Dumas, M., Ter Hofstede, A.H.: Questionnaire-based variability modeling for system configuration. Softw. Syst. Model. 8(2), 251–274 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Koschmider, A., Reijers, H.A.: Improving the process of process modelling by the use of domain process patterns. Enterpr. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 29–57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Makni, L., Haddar, N.Z., Ben-Abdallah, H.: An automated method for the construction of semantic business process patterns. Int. J. Process Manage. Benchmark. 8(3), 263–290 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Fellmann, M., Delfmann, P., Koschmider, A., Laue, R., Leopold, H., Schoknecht, A.: Semantic technology in business process modeling and analysis. Part 2: domain patterns and (semantic) process model elicitation. In: EMISA Forum, vol. 35, pp. 12–23 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

26. Koschmider, A., Hornung, T., Oberweis, A.: Recommendation-based editor for business process modeling. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(6), 483–503 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Deng, S., et al.: A recommendation system to facilitate business process modeling. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 47(6), 1380–1394 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Bobek, S., Baran, M., Kluza, K., Nalepa, G.J.: Application of bayesian networks to recommendations in business process modeling. In: AIBP@ AI* IA, pp. 41–50 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

29. Mercier-Laurent, E.: Knowledge management & risk management. In: 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 1369–1373. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

30. van der Aalst, W.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3

31. Ivanchikj, A., Pautasso, C.: Sketching process models by mining participant stories. In: Hildebrandt, T., van Dongen, B.F., Röglinger, M., Mendling, J. (eds.) BPM 2019. LNBIP, vol. 360, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26643-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

32. Riefer, M., Ternis, S.F., Thaler, T.: Mining process models from natural language text: a state-of-the-art analysis. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI 2016), pp. 9–11, March 2016

    Google Scholar 

33. Sinha, A., Paradkar, A.: Use cases to process specifications in business process modeling notation. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pp. 473–480. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

34. de AR Goncalves, J.C., Santoro, F.M., Baiao, F.A.: Business process mining from group stories. In: 2009 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp. 161–166. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

35. van der Aa, H., Di Ciccio, C., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.: Extracting declarative process models from natural language. In: Giorgini, P., Weber, B. (eds.) CAiSE. LNCS, vol. 11483, pp. 365–382. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

36. Kucharska, E., Grobler-Dębska, K., Klimek, R.: Collective decision making in dynamic vehicle routing problem. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 252, p. 03003. EDP Sciences (2019)

    Google Scholar 

37. Nolte, A., Brown, R., Anslow, C., Wiechers, M., Polyvyanyy, A., Herrmann, T.: Collaborative business process modeling in multi-surface environments. In: Anslow, C., Campos, P., Jorge, J. (eds.) Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces, pp. 259–286. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45853-3_12

38. Chounta, I.A., Nolte, A., Hecking, T., Farzan, R., Herrmann, T.: When to say “enough is enough!” a study on the evolution of collaboratively created process models. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interac. 1(CSCW), 1–21 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

39. Bird, S.: Nltk-lite: efficient scripting for natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON), pp. 11–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

40. Wiśniewski, P., Kluza, K., Ligęza, A.: An approach to participatory business process modeling: BPMN model generation using Constraint Programming and graph composition. Appl. Sci. 8(9), 1428 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Armas Cervantes, A., van Beest, N.R.T.P., La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Interactive and incremental business process model repair. In: Panetto, H., et al. (eds.) OTM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10573, pp. 53–74. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

42. Adrian, W.T., Ligęza, A., Nalepa, G.J.: Inconsistency handling in collaborative knowledge management. In: 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 1233–1238. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references