Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Cerebral Aneurysm Detection and Analysis Challenge 2020 (CADA)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cerebral Aneurysm Detection and Analysis (CADA 2020)

Abstract

Rupture of an intracranial aneurysm often results in subarachnoid hemorrhage, a life-threatening condition with high mortality and morbidity. The Cerebral Aneurysm Detection and Analysis (CADA) competition was organized to support the development and benchmarking of algorithms for the detection, analysis, and risk assessment of cerebral aneurysms in X-ray rotational angiography (3DRA) images. 109 anonymized 3DRA datasets were provided for training, and 22 additional datasets were used to test the algorithmic solutions. Cerebral aneurysm detection was assessed using the F2 score based on recall and precision, and the fit of the delivered bounding box was assessed using the distance to the aneurysm. Segmentation quality was measured using Jaccard and a combination of different surface distance measurements. Systematic errors were analyzed using volume correlation and bias. Rupture risk assessment was evaluated using the F2 score. 158 participants from 22 countries registered for the CADAchallenge. The detection solutions presented by the community are mostly accurate (F2 score 0.92) with a small number of missed aneurysms with diameters of 3.5 mm. In addition, the delineation of these structures is very good with a Jaccard score of 0.915. The rupture risk estimation methods achieved an F2 score of 0.7. The performance of the detection and segmentation solutions is equivalent to that of human experts. In rupture risk estimation, the best results are obtained by combining different image-based, morphological and computational fluid dynamic parameters using machine learning methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valen-Sendstad, K., et al.: Real-world variability in the prediction of intracranial aneurysm wall shear stress: the 2015 international aneurysm CFD challenge. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 9, 544–564 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Janiga, G., et al.: The computational fluid dynamics rupture challenge 2013-phase I: prediction of rupture status in intracranial aneurysms. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 36, 530–536 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinman, D.A., et al.: Variability of computational fluid dynamics solutions for pressure and flow in a giant aneurysm: the ASME 2012 summer bioengineering conference CFD challenge. J. Biomech. Eng. 135, 021016 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Radaelli, A.G., et al.: Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model–a report on the virtual intracranial stenting challenge 2007. J. Biomech. 41, 2069–2081 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mokin, M., et al.: What size cerebral aneurysms rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Neurosurgery 66, nyz310\_664 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morita, A., et al.: The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 2474–2482 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiebers, D.O., et al.: Un-ruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362, 103–110 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeong, Y.-G., et al.: Size and location of ruptured in-tracranial aneurysms. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 45, 11 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lasheras, J.C.: The biomechanics of arterial aneurysms. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 293–319 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhidayasiri, R., et al.: Neurological Differential Diagnosis: A Prioritized Approach (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Teunissen, L.L., et al.: Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. CADA Rupture Risk Estimation Challenge. https://cada-rre.grand-challenge.org/. Accessed 05 Oct 2020

  13. Jia, Y., et al.: Detect and identify aneurysms based on adjusted 3D attention UNet (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shit, S., Ezhov, I., Paetzold, J.C., Menze, B.: A\(\nu \)-net: automatic detection and segmentation of aneurysm (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ivantsits, M., Kuhnigk, J., Huellebrand, M., Kuehne, T., Hennemuth, A.: Deep learning-based 3D U-Net cerebral aneurysm detection (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Su, Z., et al.: 3D attention U-Net: a solution to CADA-aneurysm segmentation challenge (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ma, J., Nie, Z.: Exploring large context for cerebral aneurysm segmentation (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ivantsits, M., Hüllebrand, M., Kelle, S., Kühne, T., Hennemuth, A.: Intracranial aneurysm rupture risk estimation utilizing vessel-graphs and machine learning (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Y., et al.: Cerebral aneurysm rupture risk estimation using XGBoost and fully connected neural network (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sulayman, N., et al.: Semi-automatic detection and segmentation algorithm of saccular aneurysms in 2D cerebral DSA images. Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 47, 859–865 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahmany, I., et al.: A fully automatic based deep learning approach for aneurysm detection in DSA images (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duan, H., et al.: Automatic detection on intracranial aneurysm from digital subtraction angiography with cascade convolutional neural networks. Biomed. Eng. Online 18, 1–18 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin, H., et al.: Fully automated intracranial aneurysm detection and segmentation from digital subtraction angiography series using an end-to-end spatiotemporal deep neural network. J. NeuroInterventional Surg. 12, 1023–1027 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng, Y., et al.: Automatic diagnosis based on spatial information fusion feature for intracranial aneurysm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 1448–1458 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dakua, S.P., Abinahed, J., Al-Ansari, A., et al.: A PCA-based approach for brain aneurysm segmentation. Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process. 29, 257–277 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel, T., et al.: Multi-resolution CNN for brain vessel segmentation from cerebrovascular images of intracranial aneurysm: a comparison of U-Net and DeepMedic (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Beck, J., Rhode, S., Berkefeld, J., et al.: Size and location of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms measured by 3-dimensional rotational angiography. Surg. Neurol. 65, 18–25 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiang, J., et al.: Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 42, 144–152 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kleinloog, R., De Mul, N., Verweij, B.H., Post, J.A., Rinkel, G.J.E., Ruigrok, Y.M.: Risk factors for intracranial aneurysm rupture: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 82, 431–440 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cebral, J.R., et al.: Analysis of hemodynamics and wall mechanics at sites of cerebral aneurysm rupture. J. NeuroInterventional Surg. 7, 530–536 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Detmer, F.J.: Associations of hemodynamics, morphology, and patient characteristics with aneurysm rupture stratified by aneurysm location. Neuroradiology 61, 275–284 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Detmer, F.J., et al.: Extending statistical learning for aneurysm rupture assessment to Finnish and Japanese populations using morphology, hemodynamics, and patient characteristics. Neurosurg. Focus 47(1), E16 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindgren, A.E., et al.: Irregular shape of intracranial aneurysm indicates rupture risk irrespective of size in a population-based cohort. Stroke 47, 1219–1226 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tanioka, S., et al.: Machine learning classification of cerebral aneurysm rupture status with morphologic variables and hemodynamic parameters. Radiol.: Artif. Intell. 2, e190077 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Paliwal, N., et al.: Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning. Neurosurg. Focus 45(5), E7 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Suzuki, M., et al.: Classification model for cerebral aneurysm rupture prediction using medical and blood-flow-simulation data (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, G., et al.: Development and validation of machine learning prediction model based on computed tomography angiography-derived hemodynamics for rupture status of intracranial aneurysms: a Chinese multicenter study. Eur. Radiol. 30, 5170–5182 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, H.C., et al.: Machine learning application for rupture risk assessment in small-sized intracranial aneurysm. J. Clin. Med. 8, 683 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chandra, A.R., et al.: Initial study of the radiomics of intracranial aneurysms using Angiographic Parametric Imaging (API) to evaluate contrast flow changes (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Silva, M.: Machine learning models can detect aneurysm rupture and identify clinical features associated with rupture. World Neurosurg. 131, e46–e51 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tachibana, Y.: A neural network model that learns differences in diagnosis strategies among radiologists has an improved area under the curve for aneurysm status classification in magnetic resonance angiography image series (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Detmer, F.J.: Comparison of statistical learning approaches for cerebral aneurysm rupture assessment. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 15, 141–150 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Can, A., et al.: Association of intracranial aneurysm rupture with smoking duration, intensity, and cessation. Neurology 89, 1408–1415 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chabert, S., et al.: Applying machine learning and image feature extraction techniques to the problem of cerebral aneurysm rupture. Res. Ideas Outcomes 3, e11731 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We want to thank NVIDIA for its generous support in hosting this challenge. First of all, for their platform to execute and evaluate the participants’ methods, furthermore, for GPUs’ sponsorship for the top-performing solution in each sub-challenge. Moreover, we would like to thank the B. Braun-Stiftung for their benevolent sponsorship.

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under grant numbers DFG HA 5399/5-1, HE 7312/4-1, HE 1875/29-1 and the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) under grant number BIFOLD-BZML (FKZ: 01IS18037E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthias Ivantsits or Leonid Goubergrits .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ivantsits, M. et al. (2021). Cerebral Aneurysm Detection and Analysis Challenge 2020 (CADA). In: Hennemuth, A., Goubergrits, L., Ivantsits, M., Kuhnigk, JM. (eds) Cerebral Aneurysm Detection and Analysis. CADA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12643. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72862-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72862-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72861-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72862-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics