Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Early Detecting the At-risk Students in Online Courses Based on Their Behavior Sequences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Big Data Technologies and Applications (BDTA 2020, WiCON 2020)

Abstract

Online learning has developed rapidly, but the participation of learners is very low. So it is of great significance to construct a prediction model of learning results, to identify students at risk in time and accurately. We select nine online learning behaviors from one course in Moodle, take one week as the basic unit and 5 weeks as the time node of learning behavior, and the aggregate data and sequence data of the first 5 weeks, the first 10 weeks, the first 15 weeks, the first 20 weeks, the first 25 weeks, the first 30 weeks, the first 35 weeks and the first 39 weeks are formed. Eight classic machine learning methods, i.e. Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), Radom Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Iterative Dichotomiser3 (ID3), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), and Neural Network (NN), are used to predict the learning results in different time nodes based on aggregate data and sequence data. The experimental results show that sequence data is more effective than aggregate data to predict learning results. The prediction AUC of RF model on sequence data is 0.77 at the lowest and 0.83 at the highest, the prediction AUC of CART model on sequence data is 0.70 at the lowest and 0.83 at the highest, which are the best models of the eight classic prediction models. Then Radom Forest (RF) model, Classification and Regression Trees (CART) model, recurrent neural network (RNN) model and long short term memory (LSTM) model are used to predict learning results on sequence data; the experimental results show that long short term memory (LSTM) is a model with the highest value of AUC and stable growth based on sequence data, and it is the best model of all models for predicting learning results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deng, R.Q., Benckendorff, P., Gannaway, D.: Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Comput. Educ. 129, 48–60 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayaprakash, S.M., Moody, E.W., Lauría, J.M., Regan, R., Baron, J.D.: Early alert of academically at-risk students: an open source analytics initiative. J. Learn. Anal. 1(1), 6–47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu, Y.H., Lo, C.L., Shih, S.P.: Developing early warning systems to predict students’ online learning performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 469–478 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, W.Y., Brinton, C.G., Cao, D., Mason-Singh, A., Lu, C., Chiang, M.: Early detection prediction of learning outcomes in online short-courses via learning behaviors. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(1), 44–58 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tempelaara, D.T., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B.: In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: learning analytics in a data-rich context. Comput. Hum. Behav. 47, 157–167 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zacharis, N.Z.: A multivariate approach to predicting student outcomes in web-enabled blended learning courses. Internet High. Educ. 27, 44–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. You, J.W.: Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. Internet High. Educ. 29, 23–30 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marbouti, F., Diefes-Dux, H.A., Madhavan, K.: Models for early prediction of at-risk students in a course using standards-based grading. Comput. Educ. 103, 1–15 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Howarda, E., Meehana, M., Parnell, A.: Contrasting prediction methods for early warning systems at undergraduate level. Internet High. Educ. 37, 66–75 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pardo, A., Han, F., Ellis, R.A.: Combining university student self-regulated learning indicators and engagement with online learning events to predict academic performance. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 82–92 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogersb, T., Gasevic, D.: Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High. Educ. 28, 68–84 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan, Y.Z., Wang, Q.: Prediction of academic performance and risk: a review of literature on predicative indicators in learning analytics. Distance Educ. China 1, 05–15+44+79 (2018). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U.: Predicting student performance from LMS data: a comparison of 17 blended courses using Moodle LMS. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 17–29 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreno-Marcos, P.M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Kloos, C.D.: Prediction in MOOCs: a review and future research directions. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(3), 384–401 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arnold, K.E., Hall, Y., Street, S.G., Lafayette, W., Pistilli, M.D.: Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 267–270 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., Herrmannova, D., Zdrahal, Z., Wolf, A.: OU analyse: analysing at-risk students at The Open University. Learning Analytics Review, LAK15–1, 1–16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universi-ties (CCNU18JCK05), the National Science Foundation of China (No. 61532008; No. 61572223), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC0909502), and the Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science project (No. 20YJCZH046).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huan Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yuan, S., Huang, H., He, T., Hou, R. (2021). Early Detecting the At-risk Students in Online Courses Based on Their Behavior Sequences. In: Deze, Z., Huang, H., Hou, R., Rho, S., Chilamkurti, N. (eds) Big Data Technologies and Applications. BDTA WiCON 2020 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 371. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72802-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72802-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72801-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72802-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics