The I-Walk Assistive Robot

1. Andriluka, M., et al.: 2D human pose estimation: new benchmark and state of the art analysis. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3686–3693 (2014)

   Google Scholar 

2. Barrué, C., et al.: The i-Walker: an Intelligent pedestrian mobility aid. In: Bichindaritz, I., et al. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Healthcare 4: Advanced Methodologies, pp. 103–123. Springer (2010)

   Google Scholar 

3. Bateni, H., Maki, B.E.: Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86(1), 134–145 (2005)

   Google Scholar 

4. beactive + e. https://www.my-beactive.de/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

5. Bennell, K., et al.: Measures of physical performance assessments: Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT), Stair Climb Test (SCT), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Chair Stand Test (CST), Timed Up & Go (TUG), Sock Test, Lift and Carry Test (LCT), and Car Task. Arthritis Care Res. 63(Suppl 11), S350–370 (2011)

   Google Scholar 

6. Berg, K., et al.: The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 27(1), 27–36 (1995)

   Google Scholar 

7. Bieber, G., et al.: RoRo: a new robotic rollator concept to assist the elderly and caregivers. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 430–434. Rhodes, Greece (2019)

   Google Scholar 

8. Bocklisch, T., et al.: Rasa: Open Source Language Understanding and Dialogue Management. arXiv:1712.05181 [cs] (2017)

9. Bošnak, M., Škrjanc, I.: Embedded control system for smart walking assistance device. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 25(3), 205–214 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

10. Cao, Z., et al.: Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1302–1310 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

11. Chalvatzaki, G., et al.: Augmented human state estimation using interacting multiple model particle filters with probabilistic data association. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3(3), 1872–1879 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

12. Chalvatzaki, G., et al.: LSTM-based network for human gait stability prediction in an intelligent robotic rollator. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4225–4232 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

13. Chalvatzaki, G., et al.: User-adaptive human-robot formation control for an intelligent robotic walker using augmented human state estimation and pathological gait characterization. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6016–6022 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

14. Donoghue, O.A., et al.: Using timed up and go and usual gait speed to predict incident disability in daily activities among community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 95(10), 1954–1961 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

15. Efthimiou, E., et al.: User centered design in practice: adapting HRI to real user needs. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 425–429. Rhodes, Greece (2019)

    Google Scholar 

16. ello. Der elektrische Rollator. https://ello.wmt.team/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

17. Fountoulakis, K.N., et al.: Mini mental state examination (MMSE): a validation study in Greece. Am. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 15(6), 342–345 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

18. Fox, D., et al.: The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 4(1), 23–33 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

19. Frizera-Neto, A., et al.: Empowering and assisting natural human mobility: the simbiosis walker. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 8(3), 29 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

20. Google cloud speech-to-text. https://cloud.google.com/speech-to-text/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

21. Heikkinen, E., et al.: Disability in Old Age. The Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Gerontology University of Jyväskylä Finland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

22. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

23. IrisTK. Intelligent Real-Time Interactive Systems Toolkit. http://www.iristk.net/overview.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

24. Konolige, K.: A gradient method for realtime robot control. In: Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000), vol. 1, pp. 639–646 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

25. Lin, T.-Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: Computer Vision – ECCV 2014 (Cham, 2014), pp. 740–755 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

26. Martins, M., et al.: A new integrated device to read user intentions when walking with a Smart Walker. In: 2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), pp. 299–304 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

27. Moustris, G.P., et al.: User front-following behaviour for a mobility assistance robot: a kinematic control approach, pp. 142–149 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

28. Moustris, G.P., Tzafestas, C.S.: Assistive front-following control of an intelligent robotic rollator based on a modified dynamic window planner. In: 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), pp. 588–593 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

29. Moustris, G.P., Tzafestas, C.S.: Intention-based front-following control for an intelligent robotic rollator in indoor environments. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1–7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

30. Muro-de-la-Herran, A., et al.: Gait analysis methods: an overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors 14(2), 3362–3394 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

31. Olenšek, A., et al.: Adaptive dynamic balance training during overground walking with assistive device. In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), pp. 1066–1070 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

32. Palopoli, L., et al.: Navigation assistance and guidance of older adults across complex public spaces: the DALi approach. Intell. Serv. Robot. 8(2), 77–92 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

33. Paulo, J., et al.: ISR-AIWALKER: robotic walker for intuitive and safe mobility assistance and gait analysis. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 47(6), 1110–1122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2759807

34. RASA. http://rasa.com. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

35. RASA: Open source machine learning tools for developers to build, improve, and deploy text-and voice-based chatbots and assistants. https://github.com/RasaHQ. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

36. Robot Assist Walker RT.2. https://www.rtworks.co.jp/eng/product/rt2.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

37. Robot Care Systems – LEA. https://www.robotcaresystems.com/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

38. Shin, J., et al.: SmartWalker: an intelligent robotic walker. J. Am. Intell. Smart Environ. 8(4), 383–398 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

39. Sierra, M.S.D., et al.: Human-robot-environment interaction interface for smart walker assisted gait: AGoRA walker. Sensors 19(13), 2897 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

40. THERA-Trainer e-go. https://www.thera-trainer.de/en/thera-trainer-products/gait/thera-trainer-e-go/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

41. Tinetti, M.E., et al.: Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. Am. J. Med. 80(3), 429–434 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

42. User-Centered Design: An Introduction. https://usabilitygeek.com/user-centered-design-introduction/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

43. Wachaja, A., et al.: Navigating blind people with walking impairments using a smart walker. Auton. Robot. 41(3), 555–573 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

44. Werner, C., et al.: User-oriented evaluation of a robotic rollator that provides navigation assistance in frail older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Gerontology 64(3), 278–290 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

45. Burnfield, M.: Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. J. Sports Sci. Med. 9(2), 353 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references