Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Model-Driven Engineering: A State of Affairs and Research Agenda

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2021, EMMSAD 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 421))

Abstract

The Model-Driven Architecture has been launched in 2001 by the OMG. Since then, model-driven engineering has been embraced by the research community but less than hoped for by practitioners. To ensure the relevance of a research agenda, we need a good understanding of practitioners’ problems, in particular with modelling. We therefore performed a literature review on the state of practice in the use of modelling languages for software engineering in the last 5 years according to Kitchenham’s guidelines. This paper serves as orientation within the research field and as a basis for further research. It contributes to literature by focusing on papers discussing practical use of modelling languages and the benefits and problems perceived by practitioners. The main finding presented in this paper is that while practitioners experience benefits of modelling for analysis and design, requirements engineering, quality management, implementation and deployment, they still struggle with external tool integration/model transformation and export, cognitive fit, visual expressiveness, high effort required in acquiring skills, automated analysis and high effort required in using tools. Other findings are that modelling is mostly used for documentation and requirements elicitation, the most used modelling language is UML.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soley, R.: Model Driven Architecture Model Driven Architecture Preface: OMG’s Accomplishments, p. 308 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Linden, D., Hadar, I., Zamansky, A.: What practitioners really want: requirements for visual notations in conceptual modeling. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(3), 1813–1831 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-0667-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badreddin, O., Khandoker, R., Forward, A., Masmali, O., Lethbridge, T.C.: A decade of software design and modeling: a survey to uncover trends of the practice. In: Proceedings - 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS 2018, pp. 245–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3239372.3239389

  4. Ho-Quang, T., Hebig, R., Robles, G., Chaudron, M.R.V., Fernandez, M.A.: Practices and perceptions of UML use in open source projects. In: Proceedings - 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track, ICSE-SEIP 2017, pp. 203–212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2017.28

  5. Giraldo, F.D., España, S., Giraldo, W.J., Pastor, O.: Modelling language quality evaluation in model-driven information systems engineering: a roadmap. In: International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 64–69 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dermeval, D., et al.: Applications of ontologies in requirements engineering: a systematic review of the literature. Requirements Eng. 21(4), 405–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-015-0222-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitchenham, S., Charters, B.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report Ver. 2.3 EBSE, vol. EBSE-2007-, no. School of Computer Science and Mathematics, p. 65 (2007). https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf

  8. Petre, M.: “No shit” or “Oh, shit!”: responses to observations on the use of UML in professional practice. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(4), 1225–1235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0430-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baltes, S., Diehl, S.: Sketches and diagrams in practice. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 530–541 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2635868.2635891

  10. Ozkaya, M., Erata, F.: A survey on the practical use of UML for different software architecture viewpoints. Inf. Softw. Technol. 121, 106275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozkaya, M.: Are the UML modelling tools powerful enough for practitioners? A literature review. IET Softw. 13(5), 338–354. Institution of Engineering and Technology (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5409

  12. Awadid, A., Nurcan, S., Ayachi Ghannouchi, S.: On leveraging the fruits of research efforts in the arena of business process modeling formalisms: a map-driven approach for decision making. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(3), 1905–1930 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-0689-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozkaya, M.: The analysis of architectural languages for the needs of practitioners. Softw. Pract. Experience 48(5), 985–1018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozkaya, M.: Do the informal & formal software modeling notations satisfy practitioners for software architecture modeling? Inf. Softw. Technol. 95, 15–33 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liebel, G., Marko, N., Tichy, M., Leitner, A., Hansson, J.: Model-based engineering in the embedded systems domain: an industrial survey on the state-of-practice. Softw. Syst. Model. 17(1), 91–113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0523-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozkaya, M.: What is software architecture to practitioners: a survey. In: MODELSWARD 2016 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, pp. 677–686 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5220/0005826006770686

  17. Saleh, F., El-Attar, M.: A scientific evaluation of the misuse case diagrams visual syntax. Inf. Softw. Technol. 66, 73–96 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kocbek, M., Jošt, G., Heričko, M., Polančič, G.: Business process model and notation: the current state of affairs. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 509–539 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS140610006K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huldt, T., Stenius, I.: State-of-practice survey of model-based systems engineering. Syst. Eng. 22(2), 134–145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akdur, D., Garousi, V., Demirörs, O.: A survey on modeling and model-driven engineering practices in the embedded software industry. J. Syst. Architect. 91, 62–82 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2018.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Farias, K., Gonçales, L., Bischoff, V., da Silval, B., Guimarães, E., Nogle, J.: On the UML use in the brazilian industry: a state of the practice survey. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE, pp. 372–375 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18293/SEKE2018-183

  22. Störrle, H.: How are conceptual models used in industrial software development? A descriptive survey. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. Part F128635, pp. 160–169 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084256

  23. Fernández-Sáez, A.M., Caivano, D., Genero, M., Chaudron, M.R.V.: On the use of UML documentation in software maintenance: results from a survey in industry. In: MODELS, pp. 292–301 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Monsalve, C., April, A., Abran, A.: Business Process Modeling with Levels of Abstraction (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture. https://www.viewpoints-and-perspectives.info/home/viewpoints/. Accessed 16 Mar 2021

  26. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pohl, K.: The Requirements Engineering Framework. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moody, D.: The physics of notations toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(6), 756 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2009.67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lago, P., Malavolta, I., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P., Tang, A.: The road ahead for architectural languages. IEEE Softw. 32(1), 98–105 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Information Systems Engineering, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Charlotte Verbruggen & Monique Snoeck

Authors
  1. Charlotte Verbruggen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Monique Snoeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Verbruggen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Adriano Augusto

  2. University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia

    Asif Gill

  3. University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France

    Selmin Nurcan

  4. University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Iris Reinhartz-Berger

  5. Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany

    Rainer Schmidt

  6. Stockholm University, Kista, Sweden

    Jelena Zdravkovic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Verbruggen, C., Snoeck, M. (2021). Model-Driven Engineering: A State of Affairs and Research Agenda. In: Augusto, A., Gill, A., Nurcan, S., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R., Zdravkovic, J. (eds) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2021 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 421. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79186-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79186-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79185-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79186-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation