Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Applying Stepped Task in Remote Unmoderated Test: A Case Report

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Posters (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1419))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Internet firms have shared a common sense that agile user research is significant for agile developments. The unmoderated test, as one of the most commonly used qualitative approaches, has been widely adopted. Such an approach requires participants’ trained skill of think aloud, and the remote unmoderated test platforms compensated for such a lack with their huge, trained user database. However, there is an inevasible bias that participants go for bonuses, thereby muck the tests or please the researcher. Would it reduce bias by innovatively applying stepped tasks in the remote unmoderated test? The research carries out pilot tests for validating the feasibility and identify the correct approach of applying stepped task in the situation of the remote unmoderated test. The user test of an online shopping platform is elaborated as a case study for validation of such an innovative approach. The research concludes that stepped tasks can be applied in remote unmoderated tests. However, the form of stepped task applied in remote unmoderated tests differs from the traditional moderated test which requires face-to-face communication between researcher and participants. To apply stepped task in the situations as remote usability test and unmoderated test, researchers need to 1) design tasks within a natural user journey and add connecting tasks which do not represent test objectives as to hide the test motivation from the participants; 2) observe user’s natural behaviors at the beginning, and investigate user’s motivations latter; 3) define stepped tasks’ level of detail through piolet tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hix, D., Hartson, H.R.: Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability through Product & Process. Wiley, Hoboken (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, C., Mack, R.: Learning to use a text processing system: evidence from “thinking aloud” protocols. In: Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 387–392 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Someren, M.W., Barnard, Y.F., Sandberg, J.A.C.: The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Approach to Modelling Cognitive. AcademicPress, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Olson, G.M., Duffy, S.A., Mack, R.L.: Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In: New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research, pp. 253–286 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruun, A., Gull, P., Hofmeister, L., Stage, J.: Let your users do the testing: a comparison of three remote asynchronous usability testing methods. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1619–1628 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hertzum, M., Molich, R., Jacobsen, N.E.: What you get is what you see: revisiting the evaluator effect in usability tests. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33, 144–162 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawyer, R.K.: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Verenikina, I.: Scaffolding and learning: its role in nurturing new learners (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klein, S., Leikin, R.: Opening mathematical problems for posing open mathematical tasks: what do teachers do and feel? Educ. Stud. Math. 105(3), 349–365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09983-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pernice, K.: How to Maximize Insights in User Testing: Stepped User Tasks (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shushu He .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

He, S. (2021). Applying Stepped Task in Remote Unmoderated Test: A Case Report. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1419. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78635-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78635-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78634-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78635-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics