Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Are Professional Kitchens Ready for Dummies? A Comparative Usability Evaluation Between Expert and Non-expert Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience Case Studies (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12764))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2156 Accesses

Abstract

Professional kitchens are hectic and complex environments, due to the high working pace and the plethora of skills required to operators. Such complexity has become even more severe by the increasing number of unspecialized operators employed in the foodservice. Advanced machines hold the potential to help keeping high quality standards of the final product. However, such machines have never been systematically evaluated before. In the present study, we compared the performance of expert and non-expert users in interacting with three professional machines, namely a blast chiller, an oven and a sous-vis machine, all embedded with a touch-screen interface. Results indicate that all users can accomplish the required tasks effectively, regardless of their expertise level. Still machines cannot level out the differences in the competence between the groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The level of complexity reflected the number of actions needed to accomplish a given task, so that easier tasks required a smaller number of actions to be accomplished.

References

  1. Suhairom, N., Musta’amal, A.H., Amin, N.F.M., Kamin, Y., Wahid, N.H.A.: Quality culinary workforce competencies for sustainable career development among culinary professionals. Int. J. Hospit. Manage. 81, 205–220 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fraser, S., Lyon, P.: Chef perceptions of modernist equipment and techniques in the kitchen. J. Culinary Sci. Technol. 16(1), 88–105 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Orso, V., Sperduti, A., Gamberini, L.: The automatization of professional kitchen: exploring chefs’ opinions. In: Proceedings of the 13th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter: Designing the Next Interaction (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marinakou, E., Giousmpasoglou, C.: Chefs' competencies: a stakeholder's perspective. J. Hosp. Tourism Insights (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nagasu, M., et al.: Prevalence and risk factors for low back pain among professional cooks working in school lunch services. BMC Public Health 7(1), 1–10 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson, R.N., Beesley, L.G.: Linkages between creativity and intention to quit: an occupational study of chefs. Tourism Manage. 31(6), 765–776 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackler, A., Popovic, V., Mahar, D.: Intuitive use of products. In: Durling, D., Shackleton, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Common Ground Design Research Society International Conference, London, UK (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience (Interactive Technologies): Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rusu, V., et al.: A Methodology to establish Usability Heuristics. ISBN: 978-1-61208-117-5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chuttur, M.: Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems. 9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilmore, J.: “Design principle for online information: readability, usability, and accessibility”. In: SAS Global Forum Proceedings, Washougal, WA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC TR 9126–4: Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 4: Quality in Use Metrics, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friard, O., Gamba, M.: BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7(11), 1325–1330 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Orso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Orso, V., Verì, D., Minato, R., Sperduti, A., Gamberini, L. (2021). Are Professional Kitchens Ready for Dummies? A Comparative Usability Evaluation Between Expert and Non-expert Users. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience Case Studies. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78468-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78468-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78467-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78468-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics