Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Comparison Study of Attention Between Training in a Simulator vs. Live-Fire Range

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Augmented Cognition (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12776))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1519 Accesses

Abstract

This study was designed to measure if simulation can be used beyond basic marksmanship training. The results provide evidence that the training environment (i.e., live; Group One, vs. synthetic; Group Two) does not affect overall learning and dynamic and tactical skills learned are transferable in situ, supporting earlier research that simulation training can be used for novice candidates [2, 9, 10, 12].

Following discussions with both training candidates and instructors, it was thought that participants who were trained in the synthetic environment would experience greater physiological arousal (i.e., stress) because they felt their training would not have properly prepared them for the final test. However, the results did not support this assumption, and that the design of the course produced high levels of stress during each of the two tests regardless of training environment.

We found that cognitive load was increased during training on Day 2 and Day 3 but during the final day (i.e., Final Test, Day 4) that cognitive effort appeared to decrease. These results suggest considerable resources were expended to learn new skills, and that the frequency of training resulted in a level of confidence and automaticity by the final test.

These results are important for law enforcement as it provides some initial evidence that learning tactical shooting skills can be acquired without live-fire practice. The course was designed to challenge the end-user both physically and psychologically, which we were able to validate using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIR’s) and electrocardiograph (ECG) recording devices. These findings support utilizing simulation technology for training, as it results in similar training outcomes, while reducing costs, mitigating health concerns (e.g., lead exposure, noise reduction), and it addresses access needs for a limited number of live-firearms ranges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamson, S., Denson, J.S., Wolf, R.M.: Effectiveness of a simulator in training anesthesiology residents. Qual. Safe Health Care 13, 395–397 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.5.395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Band, D., Dragota, D., Sizemore, E.: Virtual firearms ranges. Fed. Law Enforc. Train. Cent. J. 16, 21–26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basner, M., Mollicone, D., Dinges, D.F.: Validity and sensitivity of a brief psychomotor vigilance test (PVT-B) to total and partial sleep deprivation. Acta Astronaut. 69, 949–959 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bürke-Cohen, J., Go, T.H., Longridge, T.: Flight simulator fidelity considerations for total air line pilot training and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Montreal, Canada (2001). http://www.raa.org/Portals/0/CommitteePages/FlightTraining/10-12_AIAA2001-4425final_header.pdf

  5. Hexoskin®: Hexoskin® Wearable Body Metrics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.hexoskin.com/

  7. Izzetoglu, M., Bunce, S.C., Izzetoglu, K., Onaral, B., Pourrezaei, K.: Functional brain imaging using near-infrared technology: Assessing cognitive activity in real-life situations. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 26(4), 38 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Izzetoglu, K., Bunce, S., Onaral, B., Pourrezaei, K., Chance, B.: Functional optical brain imagining using near-infrared during cognitive tasks. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 17, 211–227 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1702_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Killgore, W.D.S.: Effects of sleep deprivation on cognition. Prog. Brain Res. 185, 105–129 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53702-7.00007-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krätzig, G.P.: Pistol skill acquisition and retention: a 3-year longitudinal study. (Paper No. 14042). In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krätzig, G.P., Bell, G., Groff, R., Ford, C.: Simulator Emergency Police Vehicle Operation: Efficiencies and skill transfer. (Paper No. 10115). In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nieuwenhuys, A., Oudejans, R.R.D.: Training with anxiety: short- and long-term effects on police officers’ shooting behavior under pressure. Cogn. Process. 12, 277–288 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0396-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sizemore, E.: A continuing story of firearms simulation. Fed. Law Enforc. Train. Cent. J. 11, 8–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Villar, R., Beltrame, T., Hughson, R.L.: Validation of the Hexoskin wearable vest during lying, sitting, standing, and walking activities. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 40, 1019–1024 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory P. Krätzig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Krätzig, G.P., Hembroff, C.C., Ahlgrim, B. (2021). Comparison Study of Attention Between Training in a Simulator vs. Live-Fire Range. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds) Augmented Cognition. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12776. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78114-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78114-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78113-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78114-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics