Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Ontology-Based Visualization for Business Model Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2020)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the feasibility of combining visualization and reasoning for business model design by combining the machine-interpretability of ontologies with a further development of the widely accepted business modeling tool, the Business Model Canvas (BMC). Since ontologies are a machine-interpretable representation of enterprise knowledge and thus, not very adequate for human interpretation, we present a tool that combines the graphical and human interpretable representation of BMC with a business model ontology. The tool connects a business model with reusable data and interoperability to other intelligent business information systems so that additional functionalities are made possible, such as a comparison between business models. This research follows the design science strategy with a qualitative approach by applying literature research, expert interviews, and desk research. The developed AOAME4BMC tool consists of the frontend, a graphical web-based representation of an enhanced BMC, a web service for the data exchange with the backend, and a specific ontology for the machine-interpretable representation of a business model. The results suggest that the developed tool AOAME4BMC supports the suitability of an ontology-based representation for business model design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azzini, A., Braghin, C., Damiani, E., Zavatarelli, F.: Using semantic lifting for improving process mining: a data loss prevention system case study. In: 3rd International Symposium on Data-driven Process Discovery and Analysis (SIMPDA 2013), pp. 62–73, vol. 1027. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Riva del Garda, Italy (2013). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1027/paper5.pdf

  2. Baden-Fuller, C., Morgan, M.S.: Business models as models. Long Range Plann. 43, 156–171 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, M.: Criteria for optimal web design (designing for usability). Accessed 13 Apr 2005 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertolazzi, P., Krusich, C., Missikoff, M.: An approach to the definition of a core enterprise ontology: CEO. In: OES-SEO 2001, International Workshop on Open Enterprise Solutions: Systems, Experiences, and Organizations, pp. 14–15 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breuer, H.: Lean venturing: learning to create new business through exploration, elaboration, evaluation, experimentation, and evolution. Int. J. Innov. Manage. 17(03), 1–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613400136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burlton, R.T., Ross, R.G., Zachman, J.A.: The business agility manifesto (2017). https://busagilitymanifesto.org/. Accessed 14 Apr 2020

  7. Cameron, G., et al.: Towards a chatbot for digital counselling. In: Proceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference. HCI 2017, BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR (2017). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.24

  8. Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plann. 43(2–3), 354–363 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cosenz, F., Noto, G.: A dynamic business modelling approach to design and experiment new business venture strategies. Long Range Plann. 51, 1–14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davies, I.A., Doherty, B.: Balancing a hybrid business model: the search for equilibrium at cafédirect. J. Bus. Ethics (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3960-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Rospocher, M., Serafini, L., Tonella, P.: Reasoning on semantically annotated processes. In: Bouguettaya, A., Krueger, I., Margaria, T. (eds.) ICSOC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5364, pp. 132–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89652-4_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz, J.L., Hoogervorst, J.A.: Enterprise ontology in enterprise engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 572–579 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fox, M.S., Barbuceanu, M., Gruninger, M.: An organisation ontology for enterprise modeling: preliminary concepts for linking structure and behaviour. Comput. Ind. 29(1–2), 123–134 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frick, J., Ali, M.M.: Business model canvas as tool for SME. In: Prabhu, V., Taisch, M., Kiritsis, D. (eds.) APMS 2013. IAICT, vol. 415, pp. 142–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41263-9_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., Csik, M.: The Business Model Navigator: 55 Models that will Revolutionise Your Business. Pearson, UK (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Evans, S.: The Cambridge business model innovation process. Procedia Manuf. 8, 262–269 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Havemo, E.: A visual perspective on value creation: exploring patterns in business model diagrams. Eur. Manage. J. 36, 441–452 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heiser, J., Tversky, B.: Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. Cogn. Sci. 30(3), 581–592 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Henike, T., Kamprath, M., Hölzle, K.: Effecting, but effective? how business model visualisations unfold cognitive impacts. Long Range Plann. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. Springer, US (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Karagiannis, D., Thoenssen, B., van der Merwe, A., Woitsch, R.: A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and it: combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology. Comput. Ind. 79, 77–86 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hinkelmann., K., Laurenzi., E., Martin., A., Montecchiari., D., Spahic., M., Thönssen., B.: Archimeo: a standardized enterprise ontology based on the archimate conceptual model. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development - Volume 1: MODELSWARD, pp. 417–424. INSTICC, SciTePress (2020). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009000204170424

  23. Hinkelmann, K., Laurenzi, E., Martin, A., Thönssen, B.: Ontology-based metamodeling. In: Dornberger, R. (ed.) Business Information Systems and Technology 4.0. SSDC, vol. 141, pp. 177–194. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74322-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffmeister, C.: Digital Business Modelling: Digitale Geschäftsmodelle entwickeln und strategisch verankern. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co., KG (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hrgovcic, V., Karagiannis, D., Woitsch, R.: Conceptual Modeling of the organisational aspects for distributed applications: the semantic lifting approach. In: COMPSACW 2013, 2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops, pp. 145–150. IEEE, July 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSACW.2013.17, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6605780

  26. Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M., Kagermann, H.: Reinventing your business model (2008). https://hbr.org/2008/12/reinventing-your-business-model. Accessed 12 Apr 2020

  27. Kang, D., Lee, J., Choi, S., Kim, K.: An ontology-based enterprise architecture. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(2), 1456–1464 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kappel, G., et al.: Lifting metamodels to ontologies: a step to the semantic integration of modeling languages. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MODELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 528–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11880240_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Laurenzi, E., Hinkelmann, K., Izzo, S., Reimer, U., van der Merwe, A.: Towards an agile and ontology-aided modeling environment for DSML adaptation. In: Matulevičius, R., Dijkman, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNBIP, vol. 316, pp. 222–234. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92898-2_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Laurenzi, E., Hinkelmann, K., van der Merwe, A.: An agile and ontology-aided modeling environment. In: Buchmann, R.A., Karagiannis, D., Kirikova, M. (eds.) PoEM 2018. LNBIP, vol. 335, pp. 221–237. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02302-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Laurenzi, E., Hinkelmann, K., Montecchiari, D., Goel, M.: Agile visualization in design thinking. In: Dornberger, R. (ed.) New Trends in Business Information Systems and Technology. SSDC, vol. 294, pp. 31–47. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48332-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Leppänen, M.: A context-based enterprise ontology. In: Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the EDOC International Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for the Enterprise (VORTE 2005), pp. 17–24. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Bohnsack, R., Breuer, H., Massa, L.: Research on sustainable business model patterns: status quo, methodological issues, and a research agenda. In: Aagaard, A. (ed.) Sustainable Business Models. PSSBIAFE, pp. 25–60. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93275-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Lüdeke-Freund, F., Carroux, S., Joyce, A., Massa, L.: The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy - 45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 15, 145–162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin, A., Hinkelmann, K.: Case-based reasoning for process experience. In: Dornberger, R. (ed.) Business Information Systems and Technology 4.0. SSDC, vol. 141, pp. 47–63. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74322-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Massa, L., Tucci, C.L., Afuah, A.: A critical assessment of business model research. Acad. Manage. Ann. 11, 73–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Meyer, R.E., Ho, M.A., Jancsary, D.: The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Acad. Manage. Ann. 7, 489–555 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.781867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Natschläger, C.: Towards a BPMN 2.0 ontology. In: Dijkman, R., Hofstetter, J., Koehler, J. (eds.) BPMN 2011. LNBIP, vol. 95, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25160-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Nawaz, N., Gomes, A.M.: Artificial intelligence chatbots are new recruiters. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 10, 1–5 (2019). https://thesai.org/PdfFileHandler.ashx?filen=IJACSA_Volume10No9

  40. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Technical report, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Object Management Group, Inc. (OMG): Meta object facility (MOF) core specification, version 2.4.2 (2014). https://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.4.2/PDF. Accessed 10 Apr 2020

  42. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Osterwalder, A.: The business model ontology - a proposition in a design science approach. In: Ph.D. dissertation. University of Lausanne (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rabelo, R.J., Bernus, P.: A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 28, pp. 2250–2257 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schallmo, D., Rusnjak, A., Anzengruber, J., Werani, T., Jünger, M.: Digitale Transformation von Geschäftsmodellen. Springer, Wiesbaden (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12388-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Schütz, F., Schroth, F., Muschner, A., Schraudner, M.: Defining functional roles for research institutions in helix innovation networks. J. Technol. Manage. Innov. 13, 47–54 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shafer, S.M., Smith, H.J., Linder, J.C.: The power of business models. Bus. Horiz. 48, 199–207 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Smart City Innovation Lab: Smart business model canvas (2018). https://app.smartbusinessmodeler.com/. Accessed 15 Mar 2020

  49. Smit, S., Fragidis, G., Handschuh, S., Koumpis, A.: Business model boutique: a Prêt-à-porter solution for business model innovation in SMEs. In: Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Lucas Soares, A. (eds.) PRO-VE 2016. IAICT, vol. 480, pp. 579–587. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45390-3_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Strategyzer AG: Business model canvas by strategyzer (ND). https://platform.strategyzer.com. Accessed 15 Mar 2020

  51. Teece, D.J.: Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plann. 43, 172–194 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The enterprise ontology the knowledge engineering review, vol. 13. Special Issue on Putting Ontologies to Use (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology. Auerbach Publications, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, New York (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Witschel, H.F., Peter, M., Seiler, L., Parlar, S., Grivas, S.: Case model for the RoboInnoCase recommender system for cases of digital business transformation: structuring information for a case of digital change. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, KMIS, vol. 3, pp. 62–73. SciTePress, January 2019. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008064900620073

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Peter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peter, M., Montecchiari, D., Hinkelmann, K., Gatziu Grivas, S. (2020). Ontology-Based Visualization for Business Model Design. In: Grabis, J., Bork, D. (eds) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. PoEM 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63479-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63479-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63478-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63479-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics