Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Identification of Dependencies Between Learning Outcomes in Computing Science Curricula for Primary and Secondary Education – On the Way to Personalized Learning Paths

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Informatics in Schools. Engaging Learners in Computational Thinking (ISSEP 2020)

Abstract

The multitude of curricula and competency models poses great challenges for primary and secondary teachers due to the wealth of descriptions. Defining optimal (or personalized) learning paths is thus impeded. This paper now takes a closer look at 7 curricula from 6 different countries and presents an approach for the identification of learning outcomes and dependencies (requires and expands) between them in order to support the identification of learning paths. The approach includes different strategies from natural language processing, but it also makes use of a refined and simplified version of Bloom’s Taxonomy to identify dependencies between the learning outcomes. It is shown that the identification of similar learning outcomes works very well compared to expert opinions. The identification of dependencies, however, only works well for detecting learning outcomes that refine other learning outcomes (expands dependency). The detection of learning outcomes which build on each other (requires dependency) is, on the other hand, still heavily dependent on the definition of dictionaries and a computing science topics ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achananuparp, P., Hu, X., Shen, X.: The evaluation of sentence similarity measures. In: Song, I.-Y., Eder, J., Nguyen, T.M. (eds.) DaWaK 2008. LNCS, vol. 5182, pp. 305–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Badawy, M., El-Aziz, A.A.A., Hefny, H.A.: Analysis of learning objectives for higher education textbooks using text mining. In: 2016 12th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), pp. 202–207 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fuller, U., et al.: Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomy. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 39, 152–170 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta, S., Dutta, P.K.: Topic objective and outcome: performance indicators in knowledge transfer through in-depth curriculum content analysis. Procedia Comput. Sci. 172, 331–336 (2020). 9th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF 2019) Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ji, G., Liu, K., He, S., Zhao, J.: Distant supervision for relation extraction with sentence-level attention and entity descriptions. In: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, C.G., Fuller, U.: Is Bloom’s taxonomy appropriate for computer science? In: Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research: Koli Calling 2006, pp. 120–123 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lightfoot, J.M.: A graph-theoretic approach to improved curriculum structure and assessment placement. Commun. IIMA 10(2), 59–73 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, L.W., et al.: A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pasterk, S.: Competency-based informatics education in primary and lower secondary schools. Ph.D. thesis, University of Klagenfurt - Department of Informatics Didactics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pasterk, S., Bollin, A.: Graph-based analysis of computer science curricula for primary education. In: 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pasterk, S., Kesselbacher, M., Bollin, A.: A semi-automated approach to categorise learning outcomes into digital literacy or computer science. In: Passey, D., Bottino, R., Lewin, C., Sanchez, E. (eds.) OCCE 2018. IAICT, vol. 524, pp. 77–87. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23513-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Reyhani Hamedani, M., Kim, S.W.: JacSim: an accurate and efficient link-based similarity measure in graphs. Inf. Sci. 414, 203–224 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sekiya, T., Matsuda, Y., Yamaguchi, K.: Analysis of computer science related curriculum on LDA and Isomap. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 48–52. ITiCSE 2010, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Pasterk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chystopolova, Y., Pasterk, S., Bollin, A., Kesselbacher, M. (2020). Identification of Dependencies Between Learning Outcomes in Computing Science Curricula for Primary and Secondary Education – On the Way to Personalized Learning Paths. In: Kori, K., Laanpere, M. (eds) Informatics in Schools. Engaging Learners in Computational Thinking. ISSEP 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12518. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63212-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63212-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63211-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63212-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics