Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Creating a Cross-Domain Simulation Framework for Risk Analyses of Cities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Critical Infrastructure Protection XIV (ICCIP 2020)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 596))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 460 Accesses

Abstract

Cities and their agglomerations are home to a large number of critical infrastructures that provide essential services in a geographically-narrow space. Because the critical infrastructures in a city are physically and logically dependent on each another, an incident in one infrastructure can have impacts on the entire city and its population. Thus, detailed risk analyses that strongly focus on the interactions within and between infrastructures, and on the potential cascading effects on the population are vital to protecting the critical supply infrastructures.

This chapter proposes a general cross-domain simulation framework that describes the major critical infrastructure networks in a large city at appropriate levels of abstraction. Unlike current approaches, the proposed framework focuses on the dynamic relationships between the networks and integrates stochastic models to achieve a realistic representation. The framework supports detailed assessments of the effects of threats on individual critical infrastructures and the potential cascading effects in the network of critical infrastructures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Bloomfield, P. Popov, K. Salako, V. Stankovic and D. Wright,Preliminary interdependency analysis: An approach to support critical infrastructure risk assessment, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 167, pp. 198–217, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Chaudhary, S. Mishra and A. Kumar, Estimation of water pollution and probability of health risk due to imbalanced nutrients in River Ganga, India, International Journal of River Basin Management, vol. 15(1), pp. 53–60, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Dietrich and C. List, Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized, Part one: General agendas, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48, pp. 747–786, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission, Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December2008 on the Identification and Designation of European Critical Infrastructures and the Assessment of the Need to Improve Their Protection, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission, Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 Concerning Measures for a High Common Level of Security of Network and Information Systems Across the Union, Brussels, Belgium, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Grafenauer, S. König, S. Rass and S. Schauer, A simulation tool for cascading effects in interdependent critical infrastructures, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, article no. 30, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Grundel, N. Hornung, B. Klaassen, P. Benner and T. Clees, Computing surrogates for gas network simulation using model order reduction, in Surrogate-Based Modeling and Optimization, S. Kozieland L. Leifsson (Eds.), Springer, New York, pp. 189–212, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Haimes, Hierarchical holographic modeling, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 11(9), pp. 606–617, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Haimes and P. Jiang, Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 7(1), pp. 1–12, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Haimes, J. Santos, K. Crowther, M. Henry, C. Lian and Z. Yan, Risk analysis in interdependent infrastructures, in Critical Infrastructure Protection, E. Goetz and S. Shenoi (Eds.), Springer,Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 297–310, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Haut, G. Bastin and Y. Chitour, A macroscopic traffic model for road networks with a representation of the capacity drop phenomenon at the junctions, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 38(1), pp. 114–119, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Herty, Mathematics of Traffic Flow Networks: Modeling, Simulation and Optimization, Logos Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Kelic, D. Warren and L. Phillips, Cyber and Physical Infrastructure Interdependencies, Sandia Report SAND2008-6192, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico and Livermore, California, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Kelley, P. Top, S. Smith, C. Woodward and L. Min, A federated simulation toolkit for electric power grid and communications network co-simulation, Proceedings of the Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Kenah and J. Robins, Second look at spread of epidemics in networks, Physical Review E, vol. 76(3), pp. 036113-1–036113-12, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. König, A. Gouglidis, B. Green and A. Solar, Assessing the impact of malware attacks in utility networks, in Game Theory for Security and Risk Management: From Theory to Practice, S. Rass and S.Schauer (Eds.), Birkhauser, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 335–351, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. König and S. Rass, Stochastic dependencies between critical infrastructures, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technologies, pp. 106–110, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  18. König and S. Rass, Investigating stochastic dependencies between critical infrastructures, International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements, vol. 11(3-4), pp. 250–258, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. König, S. Rass, B. Rainer and S. Schauer, Hybrid dependencies between cyber and physical systems, in Intelligent Computing, K. Arai, R. Bhatia and S. Kapoor (Eds.), Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 550–565, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. König, S. Schauer and S. Rass, A stochastic framework for prediction of malware spreading in heterogeneous networks, in Secure IT Systems, B. Brumley and J. Roning (Eds.), Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 67–81, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Kotzanikolaou, M. Theoharidou and D. Gritzalis, Interdependencies between critical infrastructures: Analyzing the risk of cascading effects, in Critical Information Infrastructure Security, S. Bologna, B. Hammerli, D. Gritzalis and S. Wolthusen (Eds.), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 104–115, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Krieg, D. Nowak and M. Bortz, Surrogate models for the simulation of complex water supply networks, Proceedings of the First International WDSA/CCWI Joint Conference, vol. 1, article no. 18, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Lin, S. Sambamoorthy, S. Shukla, J. Thorp and L. Mili, Power system and communications network co-simulation for smart grid applications, Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Paluszczyszyn, Advanced Modeling and Simulation of Water Distribution Systems with Discontinuous Control Elements, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Qiu, S. Grundel, M. Stoll and P. Benner, Efficient Numerical Methods for Gas Network Modeling and Simulation, arXiv: 1807.07142v2, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Rahnamay-Naeini and M. Hayat, Cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures: An interdependent Markov chain approach, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7(4), pp. 1997–2006, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Reiser, A queueing network analysis of computer communications networks with window flow control, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 27(8), pp. 1199–1209, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Rinaldi, Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies, Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Rinaldi, J. Peerenboom and T. Kelly, Identifying, understanding and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies, IEEE Control Systems, vol. 21(6), pp. 11–25, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Salathe and J. Jones, Dynamics and control of diseases in networks with community structure, PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6(4), article no. e1000736, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Schaberreiter, K. Kittila, K. Halunen, J. Roning and D. Khadraoui, Risk assessment in critical infrastructure security modeling based on dependency analysis, in Critical Information Infrastructure Security, S. Bologna, B. Hammerli, D. Gritzalis and S. Wolthusen (Eds.), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 213–217, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  32. F. Schloegl, S. Rohjans, S. Lehnho , J. Velasquez, C. Steinbrink and P. Palensky, Towards a classification scheme for co-simulation approaches in energy systems, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Smart Electric Distribution System and Technologies, pp. 516–521, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Sunela and R. Puust, Real time water supply system hydraulic and quality modeling – A case study, Procedia Engineering, vol. 119, pp. 744–752, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Turo, V. Banuls, L. Plotnick, S. Hiltz and M. Ramirez de la Huerga, A collaborative dynamic scenario model for the interaction of critical infrastructures, Futures, vol. 84(A), pp. 23–42, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Wachter, T. Grafenauer and S. Rass, Visual risk specification and aggregation, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technologies, pp. 93–98, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  36. T. Wen, X. Lyu, D. Kirkwood, L. Chen, C. Constantinou and C. Roberts, Co-simulation testing of data communications system supporting CBTC, Proceedings of the Eighteenth IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 2665–2670, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Z. Yan, Y. Haimes and M. Waller, Hierarchical coordinated Bayesian model for risk analysis with sparse data, presented at the Society of Risk Analysis Annual Meeting, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  38. N. Yuhara and J. Tajima, Multi-driver agent-based trac simulation systems for evaluating the effects of advanced driver assistance systems on road traffic accidents, Cognition, Technology and Work, vol. 8(4), pp. 283–300, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Sandra König for invaluable feedback provided during her reviews. This research was supported by Project ODYSSEUS funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency under Grant No. 873539.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Schauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schauer, S., Rass, S. (2020). Creating a Cross-Domain Simulation Framework for Risk Analyses of Cities. In: Staggs, J., Shenoi, S. (eds) Critical Infrastructure Protection XIV. ICCIP 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 596. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62840-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62840-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62839-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62840-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics