Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Identifying Cohorts: Recommending Drill-Downs Based on Differences in Behaviour for Process Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12400))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process mining aims to obtain insights from event logs to improve business processes. In complex environments with large variances in process behaviour, analysing and making sense of such complex processes becomes challenging. Insights in such processes can be obtained by identifying sub-groups of traces (cohorts) and studying their differences. In this paper, we introduce a new framework that elicits features from trace attributes, measures the stochastic distance between cohorts defined by sets of these features, and presents this landscape of sets of features and their influence on process behaviour to users. Our framework differs from existing work in that it can take many aspects of behaviour into account, including the ordering of activities in traces (control flow), the relative frequency of traces (stochastic perspective), and cost. The framework has been instantiated and implemented, has been evaluated for feasibility on multiple publicly available real-life event logs, and evaluated on real-life case studies in two Australian universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Comparative process mining in education: an approach based on process cubes. SIMPDA 203, 110–134 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolt, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Leoni, M.: Finding process variants in event logs. In: Panetto, H., et al. (eds.) OTM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10573, pp. 45–52. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolt, A., de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process variant comparison: using event logs to detect differences in behavior and business rules. IS 74, 53–66 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bolt, A., et al.: Exploiting process cubes, analytic workflows and process mining for business process reporting: a case study in education. SIMPDA 1527, 33–47 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolt, A., de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A visual approach to spot statistically-significant differences in event logs based on process metrics. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 151–166. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Context aware trace clustering: towards improving process mining results. In: SDM, pp. 401–412 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buijs, J.C.A.M., Reijers, H.A.: Comparing business process variants using models and event logs, In: BPMDS. pp. 154–168 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Eck, M.L., Lu, X., Leemans, S.J.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: PM\(^2\): a process mining project methodology. In: CAiSE, pp. 297–313 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joglekar, M., Garcia-Molina, H., Parameswaran, A.G.: Interactive data exploration with smart drill-down. TKDE 31(1), 46–60 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, D.J.L., et al.: Avoiding drill-down fallacies with VisPilot: assisted exploration of data subsets. In: IUI, pp. 186–196. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leemans, S.J.J., Poppe, E., Wynn, M.T.: Directly follows-based process mining: exploration & a case study. In: ICPM, pp. 25–32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leemans, S.J.J., Syring, A.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Earth movers’ stochastic conformance checking. In: BPM Forum, pp. 127–143 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leemans, S.J.J., et al.: Results with identifying cohorts: Recommending drill-downs based on differences in behaviour for process mining. Queensland University of Technology, Technical report (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Leoni, M., et al.: A general process mining framework for correlating, predicting and clustering dynamic behavior based on event logs. Inf. Syst. 56, 235–257 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maaradji, A., Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Ostovar, A.: Detecting sudden and gradual drifts in business processes from execution traces. TKDE 29(10), 2140–2154 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marsh, D.R., Schroeder, D.G., Dearden, K.A., Sternin, J., Sternin, M.: The power of positive deviance. BMJ 329(7475), 1177–1179 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seeliger, A., Sánchez Guinea, A., Nolle, T., Mühlhäuser, M.: ProcessExplorer: intelligent process mining guidance. In: Hildebrandt, T., van Dongen, B.F., Röglinger, M., Mendling, J. (eds.) BPM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11675, pp. 216–231. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Shabaninejad, S., et al.: Automated insightful drill-down recommendations for learning analytics dashboards. In: LAK, p. 41–46 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shabaninejad, S., et al.: Recommending insightful drill-downs based on learning processes for learning analytics dashboards. In: AIED, pp. 486–499 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suriadi, S., Mans, R.S., Wynn, M.T., Partington, A., Karnon, J.: Measuring patient flow variations: a cross-organisational process mining approach. In: Ouyang, C., Jung, J.-Y. (eds.) AP-BPM 2014. LNBIP, vol. 181, pp. 43–58. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08222-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Syamsiyah, A., et al.: Business process comparison: a methodology and case study. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 288, pp. 253–267. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Taymouri, F., Rosa, M.L., Dumas, M., Maggi, F.M.: Business process variant analysis: Survey and classification. CoRR abs/1911.07582 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weerdt, J.D., vanden Broucke, S.K.L.M., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B., : Active trace clustering for improved process discovery. TKDE 25(12), 2708–2720 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sander J. J. Leemans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Leemans, S.J.J., Shabaninejad, S., Goel, K., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Wynn, M.T. (2020). Identifying Cohorts: Recommending Drill-Downs Based on Differences in Behaviour for Process Mining. In: Dobbie, G., Frank, U., Kappel, G., Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62521-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62522-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics