Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

k-TruthScore: Fake News Mitigation in the Presence of Strong User Bias

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Data and Social Networks (CSoNet 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12575))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Due to the extensive role of social networks in social media, it is easy for people to share the news, and it spreads faster than ever before. These platforms also have been exploited to share the rumor or fake information, which is a threat to society. One method to reduce the impact of fake information is making people aware of the correct information based on hard proof. In this work, first, we propose a propagation model called Competitive Independent Cascade Model with users’ Bias (CICMB) that considers the presence of strong user bias towards different opinions, believes, or political parties. We further propose a method, called \(k-TruthScore\), to identify an optimal set of truth campaigners from a given set of prospective truth campaigners to minimize the influence of rumor spreaders on the network. We compare \(k-TruthScore\) with state of the art methods, and we measure their performances as the percentage of the saved nodes (nodes that would have believed in the fake news in the absence of the truth campaigners). We present these results on a few real-world networks, and the results show that \(k-TruthScore\) method outperforms baseline methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Google trends fake news. Accessed 11 September 2020

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amoruso, M., Anello, D., Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D.: Contrasting the spread of misinformation in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1323–1331. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, C., Fichet, E., Ding, Y., Spiro, E.S., Starbird, K.: Keeping up with the tweet-dashians: the impact of’official’accounts on online rumoring. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 452–465. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budak, C., Agrawal, D., El Abbadi, A.: Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 665–674. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, X., Sin, S.C.J., Theng, Y.L., Lee, C.S.: Why do social media users share misinformation? In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 111–114. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Choudhury, M., Lin, Y.R., Sundaram, H., Candan, K.S., Xie, L., Kelliher, A.: How does the data sampling strategy impact the discovery of information diffusion in social media? In: Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Choudhury, M., Sundaram, H., John, A., Seligmann, D.D.: Social synchrony: predicting mimicry of user actions in online social media. In: 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 151–158. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farajtabar, M., et al.: Fake news mitigation via point process based intervention. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.07823 (2017)

  9. Forum, W.E.: The global risks report 2017

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halimeh, A.A., Pourghomi, P., Safieddine, F.: The impact of Facebook’s news fact-checking on information quality (IQ) shared on social media (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 1127–1138. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11523468_91

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, J.H., Bock, G.W.: A study on the factors affecting the behavior of spreading online rumors: focusing on the rumor recipient’s emotions. In: PACIS, p. 98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, C., Shin, J., Hong, A.: Does social media use really make people politically polarized? Direct and indirect effects of social media use on political polarization in South Korea. Telemat. Inform. 35(1), 245–254 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosseri, A.: Working to stop misinformation and false news (2017). https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/04/working-to-stop-misinformation-and-false-news/

  15. Nguyen, N.P., Yan, G., Thai, M.T., Eidenbenz, S.: Containment of misinformation spread in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 213–222. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ozturk, P., Li, H., Sakamoto, Y.: Combating rumor spread on social media: the effectiveness of refutation and warning. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2406–2414. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, J., Cha, M., Kim, H., Jeong, J.: Managing bad news in social media: a case study on domino’s pizza crisis. In: ICWSM, vol. 12, pp. 282–289 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pham, C.V., Phu, Q.V., Hoang, H.X.: Targeted misinformation blocking on online social networks. In: Nguyen, N.T., Hoang, D.H., Hong, T.-P., Pham, H., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ACIIDS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10751, pp. 107–116. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75417-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Pham, C.V., Phu, Q.V., Hoang, H.X., Pei, J., Thai, M.T.: Minimum budget for misinformation blocking in online social networks. J. Comb. Optim. 38(4), 1101–1127 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-019-00439-5

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Saxena, A., Hsu, W., Lee, M.L., Leong Chieu, H., Ng, L., Teow, L.N.: Mitigating misinformation in online social network with top-k debunkers and evolving user opinions. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference, pp. 363–370 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soares, F.B., Recuero, R., Zago, G.: Influencers in polarized political networks on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society, pp. 168–177 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Song, C., Hsu, W., Lee, M.: Temporal influence blocking: minimizing the effect of misinformation in social networks. In: 33rd IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2017, San Diego, CA, USA, 19–22 April 2017, pp. 847–858 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2017.134

  23. Tanaka, Y., Sakamoto, Y., Matsuka, T.: Toward a social-technological system that inactivates false rumors through the critical thinking of crowds. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 649–658. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M., Gummadi, K.P.: On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks, pp. 37–42. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Yu., Feng, Y., Hong, Z., Berger, R., Luo, J.: How polarized have we become? A multimodal classification of Trump followers and Clinton followers. In: Ciampaglia, G.L., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds.) SocInfo 2017. LNCS, vol. 10539, pp. 440–456. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, L., Li, Z., Giua, A.: Influence minimization in linear threshold networks. Automatica 100, 10–16 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akrati Saxena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saxena, A., Saxena, H., Gera, R. (2020). k-TruthScore: Fake News Mitigation in the Presence of Strong User Bias. In: Chellappan, S., Choo, KK.R., Phan, N. (eds) Computational Data and Social Networks. CSoNet 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12575. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66046-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66046-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66045-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66046-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics