Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

The Digital Divide: How Low-Literate Freshman Search for Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1217))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2875 Accesses

Abstract

Prior research with low literate internet users has shown a tendency to perform fewer searches and do not ‘fact check’ the information they found, often being satisfied with their initial findings. Research was conducted to understand how degree seeking low literate and medium to high literate adults search for information online. Ten low literate and ten medium to high literate degree seeking freshman and five non-degree seeking low literate participants were recruited to conduct three search tasks designed to mimic a low-level college science task. Low literate degree seeking participants were found to have search habits similar to the degree seeking medium to high literate participants. Degree seeking participants performed more searches and accessed more sites for each task than the non-degree seeking participants. Non-degree seeking participants showed signs of task fatigue, while degree seeking participants did not show a similar fatigue. Results indicate degree seeking adults have higher levels of digital literacy than non-degree seeking adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is a correlation between educational attainment and literacy ability. The National Center for Educational Statistics [2] found in 2003 that people with below basic reading skills were more likely to drop out of high school.

  2. 2.

    The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine has been shown to give an accurate estimate of literacy in a matter of minutes with very little training needed to administer the exam [13].

  3. 3.

    Any degree seeking adults that scored less than 60 points on the REALM were considered low literate, while those over 60 were put in the medium to high literate group. All non-degree seeking adults tested below 60.

References

  1. Wood, W.C.: Literacy and the Entry-Level Workforce: The Role of Literacy and Policy in Labor Market Success. Employment Policies Institute, Washington DC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., Dunleavy, E.: Literacy in everyday life: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adults Literacy (NCES 2007-480). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman, M., Finnegan, R., Mohadjer, L., Krenzke, T., Hogan, J.: Literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments among U.S. adults: results from the program for the international assessment of adult competencies 2012: first look (NCES 2014-008). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (2013). http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

  4. U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, Statistics Canada and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), PIAAC 2012/2014 and PIAAC 2017 Literacy, Numeracy, and Problem Solving TRE Assessments

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fry, R.: Early benchmarks show ‘Post-Millennials’ on track to be most diverse. Best-Educated Generation Yet, 15 September 2018. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/11/15/early-benchmarks-show-post-millennials-on-track-to-be-most-diverse-best-educated-generation-yet/

  6. Shatto, B., Erwin, K.: Moving on From Milliennials: Preparing for Generation Z. J. Continuing Educ. Nurs. 23, 253–254 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buzzetto-Hollywood, N., Alade, A.: An examination of gen Z learners attending a minority university. Interdisc. J. E-Skills Lifelong Learn. pp. 41–52 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon, J.: First impressions: LJ’s first year experience survey. Library Journal. http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2017/04/academic-libraries/first-impressions-ljs-first-year-experience-survey/

  9. Buzzetto-Hollywood, N., Elobeid, M., Elobaid, M.: Assessing and addressing the digital literacy skills of first generation college students. In: The Annual Conference on Teaching Learning and Assessment, Philadelphia, PA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buzzetto-Hollywood, N.: Establishing an institutional commitment to the digital and information literacy of under-served college students. In: The Annual Conference on Teaching Learning and Assessment, pp. 15–26, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geck, C.: The generation Z connection: teaching information literacy to the newest net generation. Teach. Librarian 33, 19–23 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Modeling traditional literacy, internet skills and internet usage: an empirical study. Interact. Comput. 28, 13–26 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Summers, K., Summers, M.: Reading and navigational strategies of web users with lower literacy skills. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 42 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kodagoda, N., Wong, B.L., Kahan, N.: Identifying information seeking behaviours of low and high literacy users: combined cognitive task analysis. In: Proceedings of NDM9, the 9th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, London, pp. 347–354 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noël T. Alton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alton, N.T. (2020). The Digital Divide: How Low-Literate Freshman Search for Information. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1217. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51827-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51828-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics