Abstract
We present here a new parameter-free clustering algorithm that does not impose any assumptions on the data. Based solely on the premise that close data points are more likely to be in the same cluster, it can autonomously create clusters. Neither the number of clusters nor their shape has to be known. The algorithm is similar to SingleLink in that it connects clusters depending on the distances between data points, but while SingleLink is deterministic, RandomLink makes use of random effects. They help RandomLink overcome the SingleLink-effect (or chain-effect) from which SingleLink suffers as it always connects the closest data points. RandomLink is likely to connect close data points but is not forced to, thus, it can sever chains between clusters. We explain in more detail how this negates the SingleLink-effect and how the use of random effects helps overcome the stiffness of parameters for different distance-based algorithms. We show that the algorithm principle is sound by testing it on different data sets and comparing it with standard clustering algorithms, focusing especially on hierarchical clustering methods.
G. Sluiter and B. Schelling are contributed equally to the paper and share first authorship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Defays, D.: An efficient algorithm for a complete link method. Comput. J. 20, 364–366 (1977)
Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. 39(1), 1–38 (1977)
Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., Xu, X.: A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: KDD (1996)
Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1989)
Hartuv, E., Shamir, R.: A clustering algorithm based on graph connectivity. Inf. Process. Lett. 76(4–6), 175–181 (2000)
Karger, D.R.: Minimum cuts in near-linear time. J. ACM 47(1), 46–76 (2000)
Karypis, G., Han, E.H.S., Kumar, V.: Chameleon: hierarchical clustering using dynamic modeling. Computer 32(8), 68–75 (1999)
Krawczyk, B., Minku, L.L., Gama, J., Stefanowski, J., Woźniak, M.: Ensemble learning for data stream analysis: a survey. Inf. Fusion 37, 132–156 (2017)
MacQueen, J.B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 281–297. University of California Press (1967)
Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I., Weiss, Y.: On spectral clustering: analysis and an algorithm. In: Dietterich, T.G., Becker, S., Ghahramani, Z. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 14, pp. 849–856. MIT Press (2002)
Sang, Y., Yi, Z.: Motion determination using non-uniform sampling based density clustering. In: 2008 Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 4, pp. 81–85 (2008)
Sibson, R.: Slink: an optimally efficient algorithm for the single-link cluster method. Comput. J. 16(1), 30–34 (1973)
Sokal, R.R., Michener, C.D.: A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 38, 1409–1438 (1958)
Tarjan, R.E.: A class of algorithms which require nonlinear time to maintain disjoint sets. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 18(2), 110–127 (1979)
Vinh, N.X., Epps, J., Bailey, J.: Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: variants, properties, normalization and correction for chance. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 2837–2854 (2010)
Ward, J.H.: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58(301), 236–244 (1963)
Yang, C., Zhang, X., Jiao, L., Wang, G.: Self-tuning semi-supervised spectral clustering. In: 2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, pp. 1–5 (2008)
Ye, W., Goebl, S., Plant, C., Böhm, C.: Fuse: full spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2016, pp. 1985–1994. ACM, New York (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sluiter, G., Schelling, B., Plant, C. (2020). RandomLink – Avoiding Linkage-Effects by Employing Random Effects for Clustering. In: Hartmann, S., Küng, J., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12391. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59003-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59003-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59002-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59003-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)