Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Environmental Performance Assessment of the Transport Sector in the European Union

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020 (ICCSA 2020)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has been promoting diverse initiatives towards sustainable development and environment protection. One of these initiatives is the reduction of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 60% below their 1990 level, by 2050. As the transport sector is responsible for more than 22% of those emissions some strategies need to be taken towards a more sustainable mobility, as the ones proposed in 2011 White Paper on transport. Under this context, this study aims to evaluate the environmental performance of the transport sector in the 28 EU countries towards these goals, from 2015 to 2017. The transport environmental performance is measured through the composite indicator derived from the Benefit of the Doubt (BoD) model. The country transport environmental performance is assessed through the aggregation of multiple sub-indicators using the composite indicator derived from the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. The results indicate that the EU countries slightly improved their transport environmental performance, on average 2.8%. The areas where the inefficient countries need more improvement were also identified: reducing the GHG emissions from fossil fuels, increasing the share of transport energy from renewable sources and improving the public transport share of the total passenger transport.

This work has been supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UIDB/05757/2020.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission: EU mobility package: Europe on the move briefing note. http://nws.eurocities.eu/MediaShell/media/EuropeonthemoveBriefingnote.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2020

  2. European Commission: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy duty vehicles (2011). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=SWD:2018:185:FIN

  3. European Commission: White Paper on Transport: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a Competitive and Resource-efficient Transport System. Publications Office of the European Union (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. About the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 13 Mar 2020

  5. Gudmundsson, H., Regmi, M.B.: Developing the sustainable urban transport index. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific No. 87 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T.: An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Soc. Ind. Res. 82(1), 111–145 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Danielis, R., Rotaris, L., Monte, A.: Composite indicators of sustainable urban mobility: estimating the rankings frequency distribution combining multiple methodologies. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 12, 380–395 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Joint Research Centre-European Commission: Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD publishing (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell, G., May, A., McDonald, A.: PICABUE: a methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2(2), 104–123 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alonso, A., Monzón, A., Cascajo, R.: Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities. Eco. Ind. 48, 578–592 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reisi, M., Aye, L., Rajabifard, A., Ngo, T.: Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study. Ecol. Ind. 43, 288–296 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zito, P., Salvo, G.: Toward an urban transport sustainability index: an European comparison. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 3(4), 179–195 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0059-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu, M., Xie, R., Chen, P., Zou, Y., Tang, J.: Green transportation and logistics performance: an improved composite index. Sustainability 11(10), 2976 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., and Schmidt, S.S.: The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications, 3–67. Oxford University Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chung, W.: Using DEA model without input and with negative input to develop composite indicators. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp. 2010–2013. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cherchye, L., et al.: Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59(2), 239–251 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dyson, R.G., Allen, R., Camanho, A.S., Podinovski, V.V., Sarrico, C.S., Shale, E.A.: Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132(2), 245–259 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong, Y.H., Beasley, J.E.: Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 41(9), 829–835 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Färe, R., Karagiannis, G., Hasannasab, M., Margaritis, D.: A benefit-of-the-doubt model with reverse indicators. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 278(2), 394–400 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. European Commission - Renewable energy directive, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/renewable-energy/renewable-energy-directive/overview. Accessed 21 Mar 2020

  22. Eurostat Database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Accessed 20 Mar 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ângela P. Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gruetzmacher, S.B., Vaz, C.B., Ferreira, Â.P. (2020). Environmental Performance Assessment of the Transport Sector in the European Union. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020. ICCSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58808-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58808-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58807-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58808-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics