Abstract
The ability to leverage data analytics can enhance the decision-making process in organizations by generating valuable insights. However, there is a limited understanding of how organizations can adopt data analytics as part of their business processes due to a lack of comprehensive roadmap with a structural approach like a Process Capability Maturity Model (PCMM). In this study, the development of a PCMM based on the ISO/IEC 330xx standard for the data analytics domain is proposed to assist organizations in assessing their data analytics processes capability level and providing a roadmap for improving them continuously. Towards this goal, we conducted an exploratory case study for one data analytics process to evaluate the applicability and usability of the proposed approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Joshi, R.: Modeling the global economic impact of AI. McKinsey (2018). https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/notes-from-the-AI-frontier-modeling-the-impact-of-ai-on-the-world-economy. Accessed 25 Dec 2019
Gokalp, M.O., Kayabay, K., Akyol, M.A., et al.: Big data for Industry 4.0: a conceptual framework. In: 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 431–434. IEEE (2016)
Hüner, K.M., Ofner, M., Otto, B.: Towards a maturity model for corporate data quality management. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 231–238. ACM (2009)
Khan, A.A., Keung, J., Niazi, M., et al.: GSEPIM: a roadmap for software process assessment and improvement in the domain of global software development. J. Softw. Evol. Process 31, e1988 (2019)
Barafort, B., Mesquida, A., Mas, A.: ISO 31000-based integrated risk management process assessment model for IT organizations. J. Softw. Evol. Process 31, e1984 (2019)
Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE process assessment model. Final Release, v4 4:46 (2010)
Mc Caffery, F., Dorling, A.: Medi SPICE development. J. Softw. Evol. Process 22, 255–268 (2010)
Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O.: Model based process assessment for public financial and physical resource management processes. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 54, 186–193 (2017)
ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 33001:2015 information technology – process assessment – concepts and terminology (2015)
Korsaa, M., Johansen, J., Schweigert, T., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Softw. Evol. Process 25, 381–391 (2013)
Varkoi, T., Mäkinen, T., Cameron, F., Nevalainen, R.: Validating effectiveness of safety requirements’ compliance evaluation in process assessments. J. Softw. Evol. Process 32, e2177 (2020)
Ahern, D.M., Clouse, A., Turner, R.: CMMI. SEI Ser. Softw. Eng. (2001)
Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O.: Government process capability model: an exploratory case study. In: Mitasiunas, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2014. CCIS, vol. 477, pp. 94–105. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13036-1_9
Lukman, T., Hackney, R., Popovič, A., et al.: Business intelligence maturity: the economic transitional context within Slovenia. Inf. Syst. Manag. 28, 211–222 (2011)
Cosic, R., Shanks, G., Maynard, S.: Towards a business analytics capability maturity model. In: 2012 Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2012), pp. 1–11. ACIS (2012)
Raber, D., Winter, R., Wortmann, F.: Using quantitative analyses to construct a capability maturity model for business intelligence. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4219–4228. IEEE (2012)
Halper, B.F., Stodder, D.: A Guide to Achieving Big Data Analytics Maturity (TDWI Benchmark Guide) (2016). https://tdwi.org/whitepapers/2018/01/aa-all-ms-a-guide-to-achieving-big-data-analytics-maturity.aspx. Accessed 6 May 2019
Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G.: Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Harvard Business Press (2007)
ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 33002:2015 - information technology – process assessment – requirements for performing process assessment (2016)
Wirth, R., Hipp, J.: CRISP-DM: towards a standard process model for data mining. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 29–39. Citeseer (2000)
Gökalp, M.O., Kayabay, K., Zaki, M., et al.: Open-source big data analytics architecture for businesses. In: 2019 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (UBMYK), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)
ISO/IEC TR 15504-5:1999: Information technology—software process assessment—part 5: an assessment model and indicator guidance (1999)
Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J.: SPI Manifesto. Eur. Syst. Softw. Process Improv. Innov. (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gökalp, M.O., Kayabay, K., Gökalp, E., Koçyiğit, A., Eren, P.E. (2020). Towards a Model Based Process Assessment for Data Analytics: An Exploratory Case Study. In: Yilmaz, M., Niemann, J., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56440-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56441-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)