Dynamic Mobile Student Response System

1. Abeysekera, L., Dawson, P.: Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 34(1), 1–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336I

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Triglianos, V., Praharaj, S., Pautasso, C., Bozzon, A., Hauff, C.: Measuring student behaviour dynamics in a large interactive classroom setting. In: UMAP’ 2017 Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 212–220 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

3. Wang, S., Chen, Y.: Rain classroom: a tool for blended learning with MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (2018). Article No. 27

   Google Scholar 

4. Kay, R.H., LeSage, A.: Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Comput. Educ. 53, 819–827 (2009)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Antonelou, G.E., Verykios, V.S., Kalantzi, R.G., Panagiotakopoulos, C.T., Stavropoulos, E.C.: Supporting face-to-face live sessions in hellenic open university based on blended learning approaches and ICT tools. In: 8th International Conference in Open and Distance Learning 2015 (ICODL 2015), Section A: Theoretical Papers, Original Research and Scientific Articles, Athens, pp. 72–81, October 2015

   Google Scholar 

6. Webb, M.E., Prasse, D., Phillips, M., Kadijevich, D.M., Angeli, C., Strijker, A., Laugesen, H.: Challenges for IT-enabled formative assessment of complex 21st century skills. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 23(3), 441–456 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9379-7

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Moscrop, C., Beaumont, C.: Technology-enhanced assessment feedback. In: Carless, D., Bridges, S.M., Ka Yuk Chan, C., Glofcheski, R. (eds.) Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. TEPA, vol. 5, pp. 193–207. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_13

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

8. Kay, R.H., LeSage, A.: Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Comput. Educ. 53(3), 819–827 (2009)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Meyer, M., Müller, T., Niemann, A.: Serious lecture vs. entertaining game show–why we need a combination for improving teaching performance and how technology can help. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies IATED (2018)

   Google Scholar 

10. Caldwell, J.E.: Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. Life Sci. Educ. 6(1), 9 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Mantoro, T., Ayu, M.A., Habul, E., Khasanah, A.U.: Survnvote: a free web based audience response system to support interactivity in the classroom. In: 2010 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS 2010), December 5–7, pp. 34–39 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

12. Cheong, C., Bruno, V., Cheong, F.: Designing a mobile-app-based collaborative learning system. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 11, 10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

13. Cestnik, B., Bohanec, M., Urbančič, T.: QTvity: advancing students’ engagement during lectures by using mobile devices. In: CompSysTech’ 2015 Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, pp. 334–341 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

14. Karachristos, C., Stavropoulos, E., Verykios, V., Lazarinis, F., Sakkopoulos, E., Androulakis, G.: Promoting active learning using a web-based audience response system. In: Proceedings of the 20th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics (2016). Article No. 38

    Google Scholar 

15. Zhai, H., Liu, Q., Feng, X.: A comparative study of classroom response systems in China and abroad. In: ICDEL’ 2018 Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Distance Education and Learning Pages, pp. 69–73 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

16. Easterday, M.W., Lewis, D.R., Gerber, E.M.: Design-Based Research Process: Problems, Phases, and Applications. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

17. Lasry, N., Mazur, E., Watkins, J.: Peer instruction: from Harvard to the two-year college. Am. J. Phys. 76(11), 1066–1069 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. The React Native SDK. https://facebook.github.io/react-native/

19. Laravel Framework. https://laravel.com/

20. Expo App tool. https://expo.io/

21. Chart Library. https://charts.erik.cat/

22. Holmberg, B.: The conversational approach to distance education. Open Learn. J. Open, Distance e-Learn. 14(3), 58–60 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Moore, M.G.: Handbook of Distance Education. Routledge, London (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

24. Bry, F., Pohl, A.Y.S.: Large class teaching with backstage. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 9(1), 105–128 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Paxinou, E., Sgourou, A., Panagiotakopoulos, C., Verykios, V.: The item response theory for the assessment of users’ performance in a biology virtual laboratory. Open Educ. J. Open Distance Educ. Educ. Technol. 13(2), 107–123 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

26. Maruping, L.M., Bala, H., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A.: Going beyond intention: integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68(3), 623–637 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Gkontzis, A.F., Karachristos, C.V., Lazarinis, F., Stavropoulos, E.C., Verykios, V.S., Ubachs, G., Konings, L.: A holistic view on academic wide data through learning analytics dashboards. In: Conference Proceedings: The Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

28. Kahoot! App. http://www.kahoot.com

Download references