Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Preference-Based Resource and Task Allocation in Business Process Automation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences (OTM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11877))

Abstract

Preference plays an important role in organisational and human decision making as it may be a manifestation of proven practices or of individual working styles. The significance of the notion of preference has been recognised in a number of different disciplines. Unfortunately its potential does not seem to have been fully unlocked in the field of Business Process Automation (BPA), even though resource and task allocations play a pivotal role in process performance and these allocations could be guided by explicit formulations of preferences. In this paper, we examine the state of the art with respect to preference in the field of BPA and use this as the basis for a conceptual model capturing recognised manifestations of preference in the literature. We investigate how preferences may exhibit themselves in process automation through the notion of well-established (workflow) resource patterns. We then show that manifestations of preference may occur in real-life process event logs and how these can be extracted through the application of machine learning techniques. The findings from this research contribute towards establishing a rich understanding of preferences in the context of business processes, ways of specifying and deriving these preferences, and their more explicit incorporation in work allocation mechanisms, which can lead to a step change for realising better process performance and more effective work collaboration in today’s organisations .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.win.tue.nl/bpi/doku.php?id=2012:challenge, https://www.win.tue.nl/bpi/doku.php?id=2013:challenge.

  2. 2.

    https://scikit-learn.org/stable/.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Song, M.: Mining social networks: uncovering interaction patterns in business processes. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3080, pp. 244–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25970-1_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Arias, M., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M.: Towards a taxonomy of human resource allocation criteria. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 308, pp. 475–483. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabanillas, C., García, J.M., Resinas, M., Ruiz, D., Mendling, J., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Priority-based human resource allocation in business processes. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 374–388. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45005-1_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Canal, G., Guillem A., Carme, T.: A taxonomy of preferences for physically assistive robots. In: 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 292–297. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle, J.: Prospects for preferences. Comput. Intell. 20(2), 111–136 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Erasmus, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Traganos, K., Jie-A-Looi, X., Kleingeld, A., Grefen, P.: A method to enable ability-based human resource allocation in business process management systems. In: Buchmann, R.A., Karagiannis, D., Kirikova, M. (eds.) PoEM 2018. LNBIP, vol. 335, pp. 37–52. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02302-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Batista, M.F., Magdaleno, A., Kalinowski, M.: A survey on the use of social BPM in practice in brazilian organizations. In: Brazilian Symposium on IS, June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  8. García, J.M., Ruiz, D., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: A model of user preferences for semantic services discovery and ranking. In: Aroyo, L., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6089, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13489-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Glasser, W.: Choice Theory: A New Psychology of Personal Freedom. Harper Collins, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldsmith, J., Junker, U.: Preference handling for artificial intelligence. AI Mag. 29(4), 9–103 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, Z., et al.: An enhanced group recommender system by exploiting preference relation. IEEE Access 7, 24852–24864 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagel, J., Schwartz, J., Bersin, J.: Navigating the future of work: can we point business, workers, and social institutions in the same direction? In: Deloitte Review, Issue 21, pp. 27–45. Deloitte University Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halpin, T.: Temporal modeling and ORM. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5333, pp. 688–698. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, Z., Xudong, L., Duan, H.: Resource behavior measure and application in business process management. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(7), 6458–6468 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jalali, A., et al.: Supporting aspect orientation in business process management - from process modelling to process enactment. Softw. Syst. Model. 16(3), 903–925 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorge, A.B., McIlraith, S.A.: Planning with preferences. AI Mag. 29(4), 25 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaci, S.: Working with Preferences: Less Is More. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, A., Dijkman, R., Song, M.: Optimal resource assignment in workflows for maximizing cooperation. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 235–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, K.M.: Adaptive resource scheduling for workflows considering competence and preference. In: Negoita, M.G., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3214, pp. 723–730. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30133-2_95

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Macris, A., Papadimitriou, E., Vassilacopoulos, G.: An ontology-based competency model for workflow activity assignment policies. J. Knowl. Manag. 12(6), 72–88 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. zur Muehlen, M.: Organizational management in workflow applications–issues and perspectives. Inf. Technol. Manag. 5(3–4), 271–291 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peintner, B., Viappiani, P., Yorke-Smith, N.: Preferences in interactive systems: technical challenges and case studies. AI Mag. 29(4), 13–13 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pika, A., Wynn, M.T., Fidge, C.J., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Leyer, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: An extensible framework for analysing resource behaviour using event logs. In: Jarke, M., et al. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 564–579. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Work-Flow Patterns: The Definitive Guide. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw, J.D., Duffy, M.K., Stark, E.M.: Interdependence and preference for group work: main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members. J. Manag. 26(2), 259–279 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sindhgatta, R., Ghose, A., Dam, H.K.: Context-aware analysis of past process executions to aid resource allocation decisions. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 575–589. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Slovic, P.: The construction of preference. Am. Psychol. 50(5), 364–371 (1995). ISSN: 0003–066X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sohail, A., Dominic, P.D.D.: Business process improvement: a process warehouse based resource management method. In: International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies, pp. 291–296. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sohail, A., Dominic, P.D.D., Shahzad, K.: Business process analysis: a process warehouse-based resource preference evaluation method. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 137–161 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vanderfeesten, I., Grefen, P.: Advanced dynamic role resolution in business processes. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNBIP, vol. 215, pp. 87–93. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Yuen, M., King, I., Leung, K.: Task recommendation in crowdsourcing systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Crowd- Sourcing and Data Mining, pp. 22–26. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao, W., et al.: An entropy-based clustering ensemble method to support resource allocation in business process management. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 48(2), 305–330 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

    Reihaneh Bidar, Arthur ter Hofstede, Renuka Sindhgatta & Chun Ouyang

Authors
  1. Reihaneh Bidar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arthur ter Hofstede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Renuka Sindhgatta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chun Ouyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reihaneh Bidar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy Cedex, France

    Hervé Panetto

  2. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Christophe Debruyne

  3. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Munich, Germany

    Martin Hepp

  4. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Dave Lewis

  5. Università degli Studi di Milano Crema, Crema, Italy

    Claudio Agostino Ardagna

  6. TU Graz, Graz, Austria

    Robert Meersman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bidar, R., ter Hofstede, A., Sindhgatta, R., Ouyang, C. (2019). Preference-Based Resource and Task Allocation in Business Process Automation. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C., Meersman, R. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences. OTM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33245-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33246-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation