Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Identifying Candidates for Medical Coding Audits: Demonstration of a Data Driven Approach to Improve Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group Coding Compliance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Health Information Science (HIS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11837))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1074 Accesses

Abstract

Correct code assignment of Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) is critical for healthcare. However, there is a gap currently on automatically identifying all potentially miscoded cases and prioritizing manual reviews over these cases. This paper reports a new process using a data-driven machine learning approach to flag potentially misclassified cases for manual review. We investigated using a stack of regularized logistic/softmax regression, random forest, and support vector machine to suggest potential cases for manual review by care providers, provided details addressing the data imbalance, and explored using features from various source including diagnosis and procedure codes, length of stay and the access log data from the electronic health record system. This potentially improves the efficiency of the coding review by care providers, providing another line of defense against miscoding to enhance coding compliance, and reduce the negative effects of upcoding and downcoding. We tested the new method with four common pediatric conditions and demonstrated its feasibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rimler, S.B., Gale, B.D., Reede, D.L.: Diagnosis-related groups and hospital inpatient federal reimbursement. Radiographics 35(6), 1825–1834 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Verdon, D.R.: Report: medicare coding errors signal need for physician education. Med. Econ. 91(13), 55 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Health Expenditures 2016 Highlights. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/highlights.pdf

  4. CMS financial report FY2017. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/CFOReport/Downloads/2017_CMS_Financial_Report.pdf

  5. Stavrakas-Souba, L.: Avoiding audits by benchmarking your E/M coding. J. Med. Pract. Manage. 21(1), 51–53 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Medicare Fee-For-Service 2016 Improper Payments Report. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Monitoring-Programs/Medicare-FFS-Compliance-Programs/CERT/Downloads/MedicareFeeforService2016ImproperPaymentsReport.pdf

  7. Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the ICLR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Poucke, S., Thomeer, M., Heath, J., Vukicevic, M.: Are randomized controlled trials the (g) old standard? From clinical intelligence to prescriptive analytics. J. Med. Internet Res. 18(7), e185 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu, J., Roy, J., Stewart, W.F.: Prediction modeling using EHR data: challenges, strategies, and a comparison of machine learning approaches. Med. Care 1, S106–S113 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Radovanovic, S., Vukicevic, M., Kovacevic, A., Stiglic, G., Obradovic, Z.: Domain knowledge based hierarchical feature selection for 30-day hospital readmission prediction. In: Holmes, John H., Bellazzi, R., Sacchi, L., Peek, N. (eds.) AIME 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9105, pp. 96–100. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., Elhadad, N.: Intelligible models for healthcare: predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30-day readmission. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1721–1730. ACM, 10 August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jovanovic, M., Radovanovic, S., Vukicevic, M., Van Poucke, S., Delibasic, B.: Building interpretable predictive models for pediatric hospital readmission using Tree-Lasso logistic regression. Artif. Intell. Med. 1(72), 12–21 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Y., Biswal, S., Deshpande, S.R., Maher, K.O., Sun, J.: RAIM: recurrent attentive and intensive model of multimodal patient monitoring data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 2565–2573. ACM, 19 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, W., Bjarnadóttir, M.V., Proaño, R.A., Anderson, D., Konrad, R.: Accelerating the adoption of bundled payment reimbursement systems: a data-driven approach utilizing claims data. IISE Trans. Healthcare Syst. Eng. 8(1), 22–34 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chekroud, A.M., et al.: Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach. Lancet Psychiatry 3(3), 243–250 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes, M.C., et al.: Prediction-constrained topic models for antidepressant recommendation. In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Workshop on Machine Learning for Healthcare (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bauder, R., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Seliya, N.: A survey on the state of healthcare upcoding fraud analysis and detection. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Meth. 17(1), 31–55 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberg, M.A., Fryback, D.G., Katz, D.A.: A statistical model to detect DRG upcoding. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Meth. 1(3–4), 233–252 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo, W., Gallagher, M.: Unsupervised DRG upcoding detection in healthcare databases. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 600–605. Sydney, NSW, Australia; IEEE 2010, 13 December 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Richard Hoyt and Beth Burkhart of Nationwide Children’s Hospital helped prepare the data. Steve Rust and the rest of the data science team assisted in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Feng, Y., Lin, S., Lin, EJ., Farley, L., Huang, Y., Liu, C. (2019). Identifying Candidates for Medical Coding Audits: Demonstration of a Data Driven Approach to Improve Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group Coding Compliance. In: Wang, H., Siuly, S., Zhou, R., Martin-Sanchez, F., Zhang, Y., Huang, Z. (eds) Health Information Science. HIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11837. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32962-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32962-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32961-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32962-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics