The Strategy of Constructing an Interdisciplinary Knowledge Center

1. Aztiria, A., et al.: Learning patterns in ambient intelligence environments: a survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 34(1), 35–51 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Madden, M.G., et al.: Transfer of experience between reinforcement learning environments with progressive difficulty. Artif. Intell. Rev. 21(3–4), 375–398 (2004)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

3. Snow, C., et al.: Network EducationWare: an open-source web-based system for synchronous distance education. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48(4), 705–712 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Graetz, C., et al.: Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system. J. Periodontol. 84(2), 186–195 (2013)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Fox, B.I., et al.: Knowledge, skills, and resources for pharmacy informatics education. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 75(5), 93 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Tofade, T., et al.: Use of SMART learning objectives to introduce continuing professional development into the pharmacy curriculum. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 76(4), 68 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Wen, C., et al.: Design of a microlecture mobile learning system based on smartphone and web platforms. IEEE Trans. Educ. 58(3), 203–207 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Hu, Q., et al.: A smart home test bed for undergraduate education to bridge the curriculum gap from traditional power systems to modernized smart grids. IEEE Trans. Educ. 58(1), 32–38 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Fjortoft, N., et al.: Smartphones, memory, and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2018:ajpe7054

   Google Scholar 

10. Lehto, M.R., et al.: Scientific knowledge acquisition during the extension of GSA: an expert system for generic safety analysis. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2(1), 61–75 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Marcus, S.: SALT: a knowledge-acquisition tool for propose-and-revise systems. Artif. Intell. 39(1), 1–37 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

12. Compton, P., et al.: Ripple down rules: turning knowledge acquisition into knowledge maintenance. Artif. Intell. Med. 4(6), 463–475 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Birmingham, W., et al.: Knowledge-acquisition tools with explicit problem-solving models. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 8(1), 5–25 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Wagner, W.P., et al.: Knowledge acquisition for expert systems in accounting and financial problem domains. Knowl.-Based Syst. 15(8), 439–447 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Kasabov, N.K., et al.: Fu N N/2—a fuzzy neural network architecture for adaptive learning and knowledge acquisition. Inf. Sci. 101(3), 155–175 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

16. Prado, R.P., et al.: On providing quality of service in grid computing through multi-objective swarm-based knowledge acquisition in fuzzy schedulers. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 53(2), 228–247 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Leu, G., et al.: A multi-disciplinary review of knowledge acquisition methods: from human to autonomous eliciting agents. Knowl.-Based Syst. 105(9), 1–22 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Shult, D.: Augmenting course quality through the use of videotapes. Am. J. Phys. 49(4), 344 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Poirier, T.I., et al.: Use of web technology and active learning strategies in a quality assessment methods course. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 64(3), 289–294 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

20. Stevenson, T.L., et al.: A quality improvement course review of advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 75(6), 116 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Kesari, K., et al.: Integrating residents with institutional quality improvement teams. Med. Educ. 51, 1173 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Porter, A.L., et al.: Development of a holistic assessment plan to evaluate a four-semester laboratory course series. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 81(2), 33 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

23. Bonnes, S.L., et al.: Flipping the quality improvement classroom in residency education. Acad. Med. 92(1), 101 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Hessler, M., et al.: Availability of cookies during an academic course session affects evaluation of teaching. Med. Educ. 52(6), 1064–1072 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Bastian, K.C., et al.: Does quantity affect quality? teachers’ course preparations and effectiveness. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 1–45 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

26. Zou, S., Zou, X.: On the forward-looking nature of contemporary science general education in the perspective of fairness - the enlightenment from “Science for All Americans”. In: The 2nd Capital University Higher Education Graduate Academic Forum Proceedings 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

27. Zou, X., et al.: The new mission of contemporary chinese universities: cultural heritage and innovation based on chinese thinking and bilingual processing. v 25(5), 106–113 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

28. Xiaohui, Z., Shunpeng, Z.: Two major categories of formal strategy. Comput. Appl. Softw. 24(16), 3086–3114 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

29. Zou, S., et al.: Understanding: how to resolve ambiguity. In: Shi, Z. (eds.) Intelligence Science I. ICIS 2017, vol. 510. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

30. Zou, S., et al.: How to do knowledge module finishing. In: Shi, Z. (ed.), vol 539. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

31. Hua, W., et al.: Using two formal strategies to eliminate ambiguity in poetry text, vol 539. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

32. Xu, W., et al.: The cognitive features of programming language and natural language, vol 539. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

33. Luo X., et al.: The cognitive features of interface language and user language, vol 539. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

34. Maimaiti, M., et al.: Discussion on bilingual cognition in international exchange activities, vol 539. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

35. Wang, G., et al.: Language understanding of the three groups of connections, vol 539. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references