Enabling Empirical Research: A Corpus of Large-Scale Python Systems

1. An empirical study of dynamic types for python projects. In: 8th International Conference (SATE)), November 2018

   Google Scholar 

2. Akerblom, B., Wrigstad, T.: Measuring polymorphism in Python programs. In: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Dynamic Languages, DLS 2015. ACM (2015)

   Google Scholar 

3. Alexandru, C.V., Merchante, J.J., Panichella, S., Proksch, S., Gall, H.C., Robles, G.: On the usage of Pythonic idioms. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software, Onward! 2018. ACM (2018)

   Google Scholar 

4. Chen, Z., Ma, W., Lin, W., Chen, L., Xu, B.: Tracking down dynamic feature code changes against Python software evolution. In: 2016 Third International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and their Applications (TSA), September 2016

   Google Scholar 

5. Destefanis, G., Ortu, M., Porru, S., Swift, S., Marchesi, M.: A statistical comparison of Java and Python software metric properties. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM 7th International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics (WETSoM), May 2016

   Google Scholar 

6. Destefanis, G., Counsell, S., Concas, G., Tonelli, R.: Software metrics in Agile Software: an empirical study. In: Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, pp. 157–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

   Google Scholar 

7. Guo, P.: Python is now the most popular introductory teaching language at top U.S. universities (2014). https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/176450-python-is-now-the-most-popular-introductory-teaching-language-at-top-u-s-universities/fulltext

8. Lin, W., Chen, Z., Ma, W., Chen, L., Xu, L., Xu, B.: An empirical study on the characteristics of Python fine-grained source code change types. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), October 2016

   Google Scholar 

9. Malloy, B.A., Power, J.F.: Quantifying the transition from Python 2 to 3: an empirical study of Python applications. In: 2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), November 2017

   Google Scholar 

10. Nagappan, N., Ball, T., Zeller, A.: Mining metrics to predict component failures. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2006. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

11. Nanz, S., Furia, C.A.: A comparative study of programming languages in Rosetta code. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 1, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

12. Orrú, M., Tempero, E.D., Marchesi, M., Tonelli, R., Destefanis, G.: A curated benchmark collection of Python systems for empirical studies on software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering, PROMISE 2015. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

13. The software quality company. Python is TOIBE’s programming language of the year 2018 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

14. In, H., Lee, T., Lee, J.B.: A study of different coding styles affecting code readability. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 7(5), 413–422 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

15. Tempero, E., Anslow, C., Dietrich, J., Han, T., Li, J., Lumpe, M., Melton, H., Noble, J.: The Qualitas Corpus: a curated collection of Java code for empirical studies. In: 2010 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references