Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Abstract

Valve-related heart disease affects 27 million patients worldwide and is associated with inflammation, fibrosis and calcification which progressively lead to organ structure change. Aortic stenosis is the most common valve pathology with controversies regarding its optimal management, such as the timing of valve replacement. Therefore, there is emerging demand for analysis and simulation of valves to help researchers and companies to test novel approaches. This paper describes how to build ultrasound- and MRI-compatible aortic valves compliant phantoms with a two-part mold technique using 3D printing. The choice of the molding material, PVA, was based on its material properties and experimentally tested dissolving time. Different diseased valves were then manufactured with ecoflex silicone, a commonly used tissue-mimicking material. The valves were mounted with an external support and tested in physiological flow conditions. Flow images were obtained with both ultrasound and MRI, showing physiologically plausible anatomy and function of the valves. The simplicity of the manufacturing process and low cost of materials should enable an easy adoption of proposed methodology. Future research will focus on the extension of the method to cover a larger anatomical area (e.g. aortic arch) and the use of this phantom to validate the non-invasive assessment of blood pressure differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hockaday, L.A., Duan, B., Kang, K.H.: 3D printed hydrogel technologies for tissue-engineered heart valves. 3D Printing Addit. Manuf. 1(3), 122–136 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Everborn, G.,. Schirmer, H.: The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The tromso study. Heart 99, 396–400 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donati, F., Myerson, S.: Beyond Bernoulli, improving the accuracy and precision of noninvasive estimation of peak pressure drops. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 10, 1–9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qian, Z., Wang, K., Liu, S., et al.: Quantitative prediction of paravalvular leak in transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on tissue-mimicking 3D printing. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 10(7), 719–731 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Y., Tai, B.L., Yu, H., et al.: Silicone-based tissue-mimicking phantom for needle insertion simulation. Trans. ASME 8, 021001-1–021001-7 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Byrne, N., Velasco Forte, M.: A systematic review of image segmentation methodology used in the additive manufacture of patient-specific 3D printed models of the cardiovascular system. JRSM Cardiovasc. Dis. 5, 2048004016645467 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, K.: Controlling the mechanical behaviour of dual-material 3D printed meta-materials for patient-specific tissue-mimicking phantoms. Mater. Des. 90, 704–712 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams, F.: Soft 3D-printed phantom of the human kidney with collection system. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(4), 963–972 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bompotis, G.: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using 3D printing modelling assistance. A single-center experience. Hellenic J. Cardiol. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alkhouli, M.: 3D printed models for TAVR planning. JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging 10(7), 732–734 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. https://all3dp.com/kai-parthy-shares-3d-printing-soluble-filaments-lay-away/

  12. Zweben, C., Smith, W.S., Wardle, M.W.: Test methods for fibre tensile strength, composite flexural modulus, and properties of fabric-reinforced laminates. In: Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Fifth Conference), ASTM International (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, B.: Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 18(3), 254–275 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, S. et al. (2020). Manufacturing of Ultrasound- and MRI-Compatible Aortic Valves Using 3D Printing for Analysis and Simulation. In: Pop, M., et al. Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Multi-Sequence CMR Segmentation, CRT-EPiggy and LV Full Quantification Challenges. STACOM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12009. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39074-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39074-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39073-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39074-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics