Shielding and Shadowing: A Tale of Two Strategies for Opinion Control in the Voting Dynamics

1. Alshamsi, A., Pinheiro, F.L., Hidalgo, C.A.: Optimal diversification strategies in the networks of related products and of related research areas. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1328 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03740-9

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Arendt, D.L., Blaha, L.M.: Opinions, influence, and zealotry: a computational study on stubbornness. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 21, 184 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

4. Beckett, L.: Trump digital director says facebook helped win the white house (2017). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/08/trump-digital-director-brad-parscale-facebook-advertising

5. Braha, D., de Aguiar, M.A.M.: Voting contagion: modeling and analysis of a century of U.S. presidential elections. PLoS ONE 12(5), e0177970 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Brede, M.: How does active participation effect consensus: adaptive network model of opinion dynamics and influence maximizing rewiring. Complexity 2019, 1486909 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Brede, M., Restocchi, V., Stein, S.: Resisting influence: how the strength of predispositions to resist control can change strategies for optimal opinion control in the voter model. Front. Robot. AI 5, 34 (2018)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Brede, M., Restocchi, V., Stein, S.: Effects of time horizons on influence maximization in the voter dynamics. J. Complex Networks 7(3), 445–468 (2019). https://academic.oup.com/comnet/article/7/3/445/5149693

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

9. Brede, M., Restocchi, V., Stein, S.: Transmission errors and influence maximization in the voter model. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2019(3), 033401 (2019)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

10. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(2), 591–646 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Clifford, P., Sudbury, A.: A model for spatial conflict. Biometrika 60(3), 581–588 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

12. Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87–89 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. DeGroot, M.: Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69, 118–121 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Galam, S.: Minority opinion spreading in random geometry. Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 403 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

15. Galam, S., Gefen, Y., Shapir, Y.: Sociophysics: a new approach of sociological collective behaviour. i. mean-behaviour description of a strike. J. Math. Sociol. 9, 1–13 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Galam, S., Javarone, M.A.: Modelling radicalization phenomena in heterogeneous populations. PLoS ONE 11, e0155407 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Galam, S.: Stubbornness as an unfortunate key to win a public debate: an illustration from sociophysics. Mind Soc. 15(1), 117–130 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E.: Talk of the network: a complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Mark. Lett. 12(3), 211–223 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Hegselmann, R., König, S., Kurz, S., Niemann, C., Rambau, J.: Optimal opinion control: the campaign problem. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 18 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

20. Holley, R.A., Liggett, T.M.: Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model. Ann. Probab. 3(4), 643–663 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

21. Javarone, M.A.: Network strategies in election campaigns. J. Stat. Mech. 2014, P08013 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

22. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2003, pp. 137–146. ACM, New York (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/956750.956769

23. Kuhlman, C.J., Kumar, V.A., Ravi, S.: Controlling opinion propagation in online networks. Comput. Netw. 57(10), 2121–2132 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Laciana, C.E., Rovere, S.L.: Ising-like agent-based technology diffusion model: adoption patterns versus seeding strategies. Physica A 390, 1139 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Lallouache, M., Chakrabarti, A.S., Chakraborti, A., Chakrabarti, B.K.: Opinion formation in kinetic exchange models: spontaneous symmetry-breaking transition. Phys. Rev. E 82, 056112 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Liu, S., Shakkottai, S.: Influence maximization in social networks: an ising-model-based approach. In: Proceedings of of the 48th Annual Allerton Conference, p. 570 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

27. Liu, Y.Y., Slotine, J.J., Barabási, A.L.: Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473(7346), 167–173 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Lynn, C.W., Lee, D.D.: Maximizing influence in an ising network: a mean-field optimal solution. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2016, pp. 2495–2503 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

29. Masuda, N.: Opinion control in complex networks. New J. Phys. 17, 1–11 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

30. McFaul, M., Kass, B.: Understanding Putin’s Intentions and Actions in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Technical report, Standford University, June 2019

    Google Scholar 

31. Mobilia, M.: Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 028701 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Mobilia, M., Petersen, A., Redner, S.: On the role of zealotry in the voter model. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2007(08), P08029–P08029 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

33. Morone, F., Makse, H.A.: Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation. Nature 524, 65 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Porfiri, M., di Bernardo, M.: Criteria for global pinning-controllability of complex networks. Automatica 44(12), 3100–3106 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

35. Ramos, M., Shao, J., Reis, S.D.S., Anteneodo, C., Andrade, J.S., Havlin, S., Makse, H.A.: How does public opinion become extreme? Sci. Rep. 5, 10032 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Romero Moreno, G., Tran-Thanh, L., Brede, M.: Continuous influence maximisation for the voter dynamics: Analytical solution for leader-follower networks and gradient ascent algorithm. Manuscript submitted for publication (2019)

    Google Scholar 

37. Sen, P.: Phase transitions in a two-parameter model of opinion dynamics with random kinetic exchanges. Phys. Rev. E 83, 016108 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Sîrbu, A., Loreto, V., Servedio, V.D.P., Tria, F.: Opinion Dynamics: Models, Extensions and External Effects, pp. 363–401. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_17

    Google Scholar 

39. Sznajd-Weron, K., Sznajd, J.: Opinion evolution in closed community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157–1165 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998). http://www.nature.com/articles/30918

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Yadav, A., Wilder, B., Rice, E., Petering, R., Craddock, J., Yoshioka-Maxwell, A., Hemler, M., Onasch-Vera, L., Tambe, M., Woo, D.: Influence maximization in the field: The arduous journey from emerging to deployed application. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

42. Yildiz, E., Ozdaglar, A., Acemoglu, D., Saberi, A., Scaglione, A.: Binary opinion dynamics with stubborn agents. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 1(4), 1–30 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references