Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Financing Hospitals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Management and Economics in Health Care

Abstract

The use of resources to produce hospital services raises three questions, the first of which is: how do you make efficient use of these resources to satisfy “unlimited” needs with limited services? The second is: how equal and equitable is the health system? The third is: what kind of relationship is there between efficiency, equality, and equity? The financing of healthcare services answers the question “who pays for health care?” while the payment methods or reimbursement answers the question “how are the health providers paid?” Income tax, social security contributions, and out-of-pocket money are the main means of financing hospitals. Each of them can enhance equity and equal access to healthcare services. Payment methods can be split into retrospective and prospective methods. The main retrospective method is fee-for-service while some of the prospective methods are pay per procedure, pay per day, pay per case, global budgeting, and capitation. A relatively new prospective method is DRG (Diagnosis-Related Group) payment which reimburses the hospital a fixed amount for its services to a given patient for a given treatment. A pay-for-performance (P4P) program complements the prospective method and aims to incentivize hospitals to improve the quality of their services and efficiency.

In particular, this chapter:

  • Analyzes the concepts of efficiency, equality, and equity in the healthcare sector

  • Examines in an analytical way the different methods of financing and reimbursing hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This definition is in the web page of the WHO: https://www.who.int/topics/health_equity/en/.

  2. 2.

    See Katz and Rosen (1998, p. 386–388).

  3. 3.

    The allocation is considered to be efficient if the marginal rate of transformation between two goods is equal to the marginal rate of substitution between two goods (Katz & Rosen, 1998, p. 387). The marginal rate of transformation (or the marginal rate of substitution) is the rate at which the economy can exchange one good with another. More specifically, the marginal rate of substitution refers to the producers of goods and services while the marginal rate of transformation concerns the consumers of goods and services.

  4. 4.

    Pareto Improvement occurs if the reallocation of goods makes one person better off without making anyone else worse off.

  5. 5.

    See Barr (2004, p. 44–51).

  6. 6.

    The social indifference curve is the locus of different combinations of utility of person A and person B for which the total utility is constant.

  7. 7.

    Economic efficiency is achieved when all resources are used efficiently and produce the maximum output at the minimum cost.

  8. 8.

    Libertarians are represented by Nozick (1974) and Locke (1967).

  9. 9.

    See Wagstaff and Doorslaer (2000).

  10. 10.

    See Kutzin (2001), Mossialos and Dixon (2002), and Sheiman, Langenbrunner, Kehler, Cashin, and Kutzin (2010).

  11. 11.

    In medical savings, individuals contribute a proportion of their income. This amount of money is spent at the time that persons use health services (Mossialos & Dixon, 2002, p. 21). There is a huge amount of literature on the role of medical savings (among others, see Scheffler and Yu, 1998; Hsiao, 1995).

  12. 12.

    Out-of-pocket money includes costs paid by the consumer at the time of using the health services. They consist of formal and informal payments.

  13. 13.

    The cost containment policy consists of actions that aim to control operational costs.

  14. 14.

    See World Health Organization. How are hospitals funded and which payment method is best? Summary of a HEN network member’s report. http://www.euro.who.int/en/data-and-evidence/evidence-informed-policy-making/publications/hen-summaries-of-network-members-reports/how-are-hospitals-funded-and-which-payment-method-is-best. These main types of reimbursement schemes are also presented by Mathes et al. (2014, p. 2).

References

  • Abel-Smith, B., & Mossialos, E. (1994). Cost containment and health care reform: A study of the European Union. Health Policy, 28(2), 89–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, Y., & Cowell, F. A. (2003). Thinking about inequality: Personal judgment and income distributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the welfare economics of the medical care. American Economic Review, 53(5), 941–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., & Bourguignon, F. (2001). Income distribution. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 7265–7271). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. (2009). Public finance in practice and theory. CESifo Economic Studies, 56(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N. (2004). The economics of the welfare state (4th ed.). London, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, P. (2006). Health disparities and health equity: Concept and measurement. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, P. (2014). What is health equity: And how does a life-course approach take us further towards it? Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(2), 366–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, P., & Gruskin, S. (2003). Defining equity in health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(4), 254–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, P., Kumanyika, S., Fielding, J., LaVeist, T., Borrell, L. N., Manderscheid, R., et al. (2011). Health disparities and health equity: The issue is justice. American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, P., Starfield, B., & Geiger, J. H. (2001). World Health Report 2000: How it removes equity from the agenda for public health monitoring and policy. BMJ, 323, 678–681. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7314.678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. C., Murray, E., Darbyshire, J., Emery, J., Farmer, A., Griffiths, F., et al. (2007). Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. The BMJ, 334, 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, C., Chi, Y.-L., Smith, P. C., Borowitz, M., & Thomson, S. (2014). Health producer P4P and strategic health purchasing. In C. Cashin, Y.-L. Chi, P. C. Smith, M. Borowitz, & S. Thomson (Eds.), Paying for performance in health care. Implications for health system performance and accountability (pp. 3–21). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalkley, M., & Malcomson, J. (2000). Government purchasing of health services. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 1, pp. 841–890). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittleborough, C. (2017). Health inequalities. In International encyclopedia of public health (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 406–412). Oxford: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, J. B., Knutson, D. J., & Mazze, R. S. (2006). Physician pay-for-performance. Implementation and research issues. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(suppl 2), S9–S13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culyer, A. J., & Wagstaff, A. (1993). Equity and equality in health and health care. Journal of Health Economics, 12(4), 431–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D., & Zeckhauser, R. (2000). The anatomy of health insurance. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 1, pp. 543–643). Cham, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cylus, J., Thomson, S., & Evetovits, T. (2018). Catastrophic health spending in Europe: Equity and policy implications of different calculation methods. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96(9), 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damberg, C. L., Raube, K., Teleki, S. S., & Cruz, E. D. (2009). Taking Stock Of Pay-For-Performance: A Candid Assessment From The Front Lines. Health Affairs, 28(2), 517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. K., & Rhodes, J. D. (1988). The impact of DRGs on the cost and quality of health care in the United States. Health Policy, 9(2), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Graeve, D., Xu, K., & Van Gestel, R. (2017). Equity in health financing. In International encyclopedia of public health (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 569–576). Oxford: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. (2004). Payment by results – new financial flows in the NHS. The BMJ, 328, 969–970. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7446.969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, D., Rogers, W. H., Kahn, K. L., Keeler, E. B., Reinisch, E. J., Sherwood, M. J., et al. (1987). Effects of Medicare’s prospective payment system on the quality of hospital care, RAND Corporation, Document Number: RB-4519-1. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB4519-1.html

  • Eastaugh, S. R. (1987). Financing Health care: Economic Efficiency and Equity. Dover MA: Auburn House Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijkenaar, F., Emmert, M., Scheppach, M., & Schoffski, O. (2013). Effects of pay for performance in health care: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy, 110(2-3), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1974). Supplier-induced demand: Some empirical evidence and implications. In M. Perlman (Ed.), The economics of health and medical care (pp. 162–173). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G. (2002). Financing health care: Taxation and the alternatives. In E. Mossialos, A. Dixon, J. Figueras, & J. Kutzin (Eds.), Funding health care: Options for Europe (European observatory on health care systems series) (pp. 31–58). London, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolich, A., Talavera, J. A., Broadhead, P., & Dudley, R. A. (2007). A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality. Health Policy, 80(1), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galobardes, B. (2012). Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Individual or area level: Does it matter? BMC Public Health, 12, 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galobardes, B., Lynch, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2007). Measuring socioeconomic position in health research. British Medical Bulletin, 81-82(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, M., & Smith, P. (2001). Equity of access to health care services: Theory and evidence from the UK. Social Science & Medicine, 53(9), 1149–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, B., & Sloan, F. (2008). Physician pay for performance: Alternative perspectives. In F. Sloan & H. Kasper (Eds.), Incentives and choice in health care (pp. 298–318). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurthrie, B., Auerback, G., & Binman, A. (2010). Competition for Medicaid enrolls based on performance does not improve quality of care. Health Affairs, 29(8), 1507–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, W. C. (1995). Medical savings accounts: Lessons from Singapore. Health Affairs, 7(4), 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husser, J., Guerin, O., & Bretones, D. (2012). The incentive effects of DRGs’ reimbursement rates for health care establishments in France : Toward a new allocation of surgical procedures? International Business Research, 5(12), 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegers, M., Kesteloot, K., de Grave, D., & Gilles, W. (2002). A typology for provider payment systems in health care. Health Policy, 60(3), 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N. C. (1977). Measurement of tax progressivity: An international comparison. The Economic Journal, 87(345), 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. L., & Rosen, H. S. (1998). Microeconomics (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Almeida-Filho, N. (2002). A glossary for social epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 56(9), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.9.647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N. A. (2001). A glossary for social epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55(10), 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.10.693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutzin, J. (2001). A descriptive framework for country – level analysis of health care financing arrangements. Health Policy, 56, 171–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (1982). The strategy of equality: Redistribution and the social services. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1967). Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen, P. E., & Hagen, T. P. (2009). Reimbursement systems, organizational forms and patient selection: Evidence from day surgery in Norway. Health Economics, Policy, and Law, 4(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathes, T., Pieper, D., Mosch, C. G., Jaschinski, T., & Eikermann, M. (2014). Payment methods for hospitals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD011156. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartney, G., Popham, F., McMaster, R., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Defining health and health inequalities. Public Health, 172(July), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, T. (2000). Physician agency. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), The handbook of health economics (Vol. 1, pp. 462–536). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, T. E. (1991). DRGs: The state of the art, circa 1990. Health Policy, 17(2), 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milstein, R., & Schreyoegg, J. (2016). Pay for performance in the inpatient sector: A review of 34 P4P programs in 14 OECD countries. Health Policy, 120(10), 1125–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda M., & Cortez L. (2005). The Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) to adjust payment – mechanisms for health system providers. In Conference paper presented at Conferencia Interamericana de Seguridad Social (Inter-American Conference on Social Security).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, G. (1983). Equity in health care: Confronting the confusion. Effective Health Care, 1(4), 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, G. (1994). Key issues in health economics. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossialos, E., & Dixon, A. (2002). Funding health care: An introduction. In E. Mossialos, A. Dixon, J. Figueras, & J. Kutzin (Eds.), Funding health care: Options for Europe (European observatory on health care systems series) (pp. 1–30). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. J., & Frenk, J. (2000). A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(6), 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, V. N., & Okunade, A. A. (2016). Determinants of US health expenditure: Evidence from autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration. Economic Modelling, 59(December), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A., & Thin, T. (1948). Income tax progression 1929–1948. Journal of Political Economy, 56(6), 498–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. (2011). The principal-agent problems in health care: Evidence from prescribing patterns of private providers in Vietnam. Health Policy and Planning, 26(1S), 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1992). The reform of health care. A comparative analysis of seven OECD countries, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1995). Health care reform: Controlling spending and increasing efficiency. OECD Economic Studies, 24, 7–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Value for money in health spending, OECD health policy studies. Paris, France: OEDC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Focus on better ways to pay for health care, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E. O., & Rodgers, D. L. (1991). The welfare economics of equal access. Journal of Public Economics, 45(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phua, K. H., & Lee, K. (2017). Governance issues in health financing. In International encyclopedia of public health (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 330–341). Oxford: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1928). A study in public finance. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quentin, W., Scheller-Kreisen, D., & Buss, R. (2011). Technological innovation in DRG-based hospital payment systems across Europe. In R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin, & M. Wiley (Eds.), Diagnosis – related groups in Europe. Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals (European observatory on health systems and policy series) (pp. 131–148). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. C. (2001). Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, H. S., & Gayer, T. (2007). Public Finance. 8th edition, USA.: McGraw Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, R., & Yu, W. (1998). Medical savings accounts: A worthy experiment. European Journal of Public Policy, 8(4), 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, R. M. (2008). Is there a doctor in the house? Market signals and tomorrow’s supply of doctors. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, R. M. (2010). Pay for performance (P4P) programs in health services: What is the evidence? world health report, background paper, 31. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheiman, I., Langenbrunner, J., Kehler, J., Cashin, C., & Kutzin, J. (2010). Sources of funds and revenue collection: reforms and challenges. In J. Kutzin, C. Cashin, & M. Jakab (Eds.), Implementing health financing reform. Lessons from countries in transition (European observatory on health systems and policies) (pp. 87–118). Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). The economics of public sector (3rd ed.). New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, A., O’ Reilly, J., Ward, P., & Mason, A. (2011). DRG-based hospital payment and efficiency: Theory, evidence and challenges. In R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin, & M. Wiley (Eds.), Diagnosis – related groups in Europe. Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals (European observatory on health systems and policy series) (pp. 93–114). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M., Nikolova, S., Boaden, R., Lester, H., McDonald, R., & Martin, R. (2012). Reduced mortality with hospital pay for performance in England. New England Journal of Medicine, 367, 1821–1828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Town, R., Wholey, D. R., Kralewski, J., & Dowd, B. (2004). Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups. Medical Care Research and Review, 61(3 Suppl), 80S–118S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trisolini, M. G. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on pay for performance. In J. Cromwell, M. G. Trisolini, G. C. Pope, J. B. Mitchell, & L. M. Greenwarld (Eds.), Pay for performance in health care: Methods and approaches (pp. 77–98). Research Triangle Park: RTI Press Publication.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, M. (2013). Improving patient – level costing in the English and the German “DRG” system. Health Policy, 109(3), 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, A., & Doorslaer, E. (2000). Equity in health care finance and delivery. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 1, pp. 1804–1862). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1991). Health care quadrilemma: An essay on technological change, insurance, quality of care and cost containment. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(2), 523–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M. (1992). The concepts and principles of equity and health. International Journal of Health Services, 22(3), 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M., & Dahlgren, G. (2007). Concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 1. Studies on Social and Economic Determinants of population Health No 2. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. (2011). From the origins of DGRs to their implementation in Europe. In R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin, & M. Wiley (Eds.), Diagnosis – related groups in Europe. Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals (European observatory on health systems and policy series) (pp. 3–8). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., & Cookson, R. (2000). Equity in health. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 1, pp. 1864–1910). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. H. (1993). Equity in health care: The role of ideology. In E. van Doorslaer, A. Wagstaff, & F. Rutten (Eds.), Equity in the finance and delivery of health care (pp. 287–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Evans, D. B., Kawabata, K., Zeramdini, R., Klavus, J., & Mur, C. J. L. (2003). Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis, THE LANCET, 362, 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerramilli, P., Fernandez, O., & Thomson, S. (2018). Financial protection in Europe: A systematic review of the literature and mapping of data availability. Health Policy, 122(5), 493–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chletsos, M., Saiti, A. (2019). Financing Hospitals. In: Strategic Management and Economics in Health Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35370-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35370-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35369-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35370-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics