Requirements Analysis of a Serious Game for Deaf Players

1. Church, A., Paatsch, L., Toe, D.: Some trouble with repair: conversations between children with cochlear implants and hearing peers. Discourse Stud. 19(1), 49–68 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Figueras, B., Edwards, L., Langdon, D.: Executive function and language in deaf children. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 13(3), 362–377 (2008)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Hebert, A.M.: An exploratory study of characteristics associated with postsecondary educational attainment in students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Dissertation/Thesis, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (2012)

   Google Scholar 

4. Kent, B.A.: Identity issues for hard-of-hearing adolescents aged 11, 13, and 15 in mainstream setting. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 8(3), 315–324 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Reed, S., Antia, S.D., Kreimeyer, K.H.: Academic status of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in public schools: student, home, and service facilitators and detractors. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 13(4), 485–502 (2008)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Michael, R., Zidan, H.M.: Differences in self-advocacy among hard of hearing and typical hearing students. Res. Dev. Disabil. 72, 118–127 (2018)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Thagard, E.K., Hilsmier, A.S., Easterbrooks, S.R.: Pragmatic language in deaf and hard of hearing students: correlation with success in general education. Am. Ann. Deaf 155(5), 526–534 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Yoshinaga-Itano, C.: The missing link in language learning of children who are deaf or hard of hearing: pragmatics. Cochlear Implant. Int. 16(suppl.) S53–S54 (2015)

   Google Scholar 

9. Jones, A.C., Gutierrez, R., Ludlow, A.K.: Confronting the language barrier: theory of mind in deaf children. J. Commun. Disord. 56, 47–58 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Peterson, C.C., Siegal, M.: Representing inner worlds: theory of mind in autistic, deaf, and normal hearing children. Psychol. Sci. 10(2), 126–129 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Platt-Young, Z., Hoermann, S.: Computer-based interventions for social skills training of deaf and hard of hearing children and youths, and of interventions for ASD children and youths in which the area being studied is related to those also experienced by deaf and hard of hearing students. In: PROSPERO 2018, CRD42018092708 (2018). http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018092708

12. Cooper, A.: About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design, 4th edn. (no. Book, Whole). Wiley, Indianapolis (2014)

    Google Scholar 

13. Glaser, B.G.: The grounded theory perspective: its origins and growth. Grounded Theory Rev.: Int. J. 15(1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

14. Moore, J.: An exploration of the origin of classic grounded theory: Jennifer Moore looks at the origin, development, misinterpretation and misuse of grounded theory. Nurse Res. 17(1), 8–14 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Ideo (ed.) The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design: Design Kit, 1st. edn, pp. 189. IDEO, San Francisco (2015)

    Google Scholar 

16. Turner, A.M., Reeder, B., Ramey, J.: Scenarios, personas and user stories from design ethnography: evidence-based design representations of communicable disease investigations. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(4), 575–584 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Daae, J., Boks, C.: A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 106, 680–689 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A.: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 5th edn, pp. 280. Sage Publications (2014)

    Google Scholar 

19. Morse, J.M.: Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual. Health Res. 25(9), 1212–1222 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Hutchinson, S.A.: Education and grounded theory. J. Thought 21(3), 50–68 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

21. Guest, G., Bunce, A., Johnson, L.: How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1), 59–82 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Birks, M., Mills, J.: Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Sage (2015)

    Google Scholar 

23. Savin-Baden, M., Major, C.H.: Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice (no. Book, Whole). Routledge, Abingdon (2012)

    Google Scholar 

24. Aldiabat, K.M., Le Navenec, C.-L.: Data saturation: the mysterious step in grounded theory method. Qual. Rep. 23(1), 19 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

25. Marschark, M., Walton, D., Crowe, K., Borgna, G., Kronenberger, W.G.: Relations of social maturity, executive function, and self-efficacy among deaf university students. Deaf. Educ. Int. 20(2), 100–120 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Cassidy, S.: Resilience building in students: the role of academic self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. Orig. Res. 6, 1781 (2015). (in English)

    Google Scholar 

27. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am. Psychol. 37(2), 122–147 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, 1st edn, p. 640. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)

    Google Scholar 

29. Test, D.W., Fowler, C.H., Wood, W.M., Brewer, D.M., Eddy, S.: A conceptual framework of self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Remedial Spec. Educ. 26(1), 43–54 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references