Abstract
The actual video consumption behaviors are blurring the traditional boundaries between linear and non-linear viewing, leveraged by On-demand and Over-the-Top (OTT) content offers. The Managed-Operated Networks (MON) adapted to this shift by providing flexibility to content access via Catch-up and Time-shift TV services. In addition, manufacturers of Smart TVs and high-end media centers (e.g. Apple TV) are offering their commercial solutions with a silo-based approach, lacking a fluid User eXperience (UX) when the user switches between proprietary applications (apps) displaying different settings and User Interfaces (UIs). In this framework, OTT providers have been taking the lead on setting the trends with partially unified cross-source UIs, enriched with personalization features to enhance the UX. These trends also contrast with Pay-TV solutions based in UIs mostly oriented to the traditional TV channel’s line-up. Based on this opportunity, an operator-based iTV solution, delivered over a set-top box (STB), was developed within the UltraTV R&D project. This initiative brought together the academic and the industry fields to design, develop and validate a concept of a profile-based and cross-source recommendation UI (offering, at the same level, content from linear and non-linear TV, Netflix, YouTube and Facebook videos). After an iterative evaluation through expert reviews and laboratory tests, a field trial validation, with end users, of a fully functional prototype was set. Qualitative data collection methods along with a triangulation of UX scales were applied to gather opinions and measure usability, hedonic and emotional parameters. The results were arranged by age groups and viewing dynamics to reveal motivational indicators related to the achieved viewing experience. The unified access to different sources fostered content discovery and was particularly valued by younger audiences. The outcomes from this empirical study aim to provide valuable contributions to push the next generation of television platforms and bring younger audiences back to the TV screen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Sky Group: http://bit.ly/2LcigCg.
- 2.
Hulu Homepage: https://www.hulu.com/live-tv.
- 3.
AttrakDiff: http://attrakdiff.de/.
References
Ericsson-Consumer lab. TV and Media 2017: A Consumer-Driven Future of Media. Ericsson, Stockholm (2017)
Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Teles, B.M.: TV discovery & enjoy: a new approach to help users finding the right TV Program to to Watch. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video -TVX 2014, pp. 63–70. ACM, Newcastle (2014)
Abreu, J., Nogueira, J., Becker, V., Cardoso, B.: Survey of catch-up TV and other time-shift services: a comprehensive analysis and taxonomy of linear and nonlinear television. Telecommun. Syst. 64(1), 57–74 (2017)
Vanattenhoven, J., Geerts, D.: Broadcast, video-on-demand, and other ways to watch television content. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video - TVX 2015, pp. 73–82. ACM, Brussels (2015)
Nielsen-Company. Screen wars: The battle for eye space in a TV-everywhere world. Nielsen Insights, Nielsen, New York (2015)
Almeida, P., et al.: Iterative user experience evaluation of a user interface for the unification of TV contents. In: Abásolo, M.J., Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T. (eds.) jAUTI 2017. CCIS, vol. 813, pp. 44–57. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90170-1_4
Almeida, P., et al.: UltraTV: an iTV content unification prototype. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video - TVX 2018. ACM, Seoul (2018)
Lowdermilk, T.: User-Centered Design: A Developer’s Guide to Building User-Friendly Applications, vol. 1. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2013). (M. Treseler, ed.)
Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T., Velhinho, A., Fernandes, S.: Using experts review to validate an iTV UI for the unification of contents. In: Proceedings of The 12th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics (IMSCI 2018). Springer, Orlando (2018)
Almeida, P., Ferraz de Abreu, J., Oliveira, E., Velhinho, A.: Expert evaluation of a user interface for the unification of TV contents. In: Proceedings of the 6th Iberoamerican Conference on Applications and Usability of Interactive TV - jAUTI 2017, pp. 59–70. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro (2017)
Almeida, P., Jorge, A., Fernandes, S., Oliveira, E.: Content unification in iTV to enhance user experience: The UltraTV Project. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video - TVX 2018. ACM, Seoul (2018)
Waterman, D., Sherman, R., Wook Ji, S.: The economics of online television: industry development, aggregation, and “TV Everywhere”. Telecommun. Policy 37(9), 725–736 (2013)
Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T.: A UX evaluation approach for second-screen applications. In: Abásolo, M.J., Perales, F.J., Bibiloni, A. (eds.) jAUTI/CTVDI -2015. CCIS, vol. 605, pp. 105–120. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38907-3_9
Mahlke, S., Thüring, M.: Studying antecedents of emotional experiences in interactive contexts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2007, pp. 915–918. ACM, San Jose (2007)
Bernhaupt, R., Pirker, M.: Evaluating user experience for interactive television: towards the development of a domain-specific user experience questionnaire. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8118, pp. 642–659. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_45
Hassenzahl, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine on - IHM 2008, pp. 11–15 (2008)
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)
Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)
Brooke, J.: SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)
Martins, A.I., Rosa, A.F., Queirós, A., Silva, A., Rocha, N.P.: European Portuguese validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS). Procedia Comput. Sci. 67, 293–300 (2015)
Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment semantic differential manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Therapy Exp. Psychiatry 25, 49–59 (1994)
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität, pp. 187–196. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag (2003)
Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods Qualitative Inquiry, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)
Acknowledgments
This paper is a result of the UltraTV - UltraHD TV Application Ecosystem project (grant agreement no.17738), funded by COMPETE 2020, Portugal 2020 and the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). Authors are grateful to the project partners.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Velhinho, A., Fernandes, S., Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Silva, T. (2019). Field Trial of a New iTV Approach: The Potential of Its UX Among Younger Audiences. In: Abásolo, M., Silva, T., González, N. (eds) Applications and Usability of Interactive TV. jAUTI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1004. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23862-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23862-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23861-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23862-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)