The Impact of Different Human-Machine Interface Feedback Modalities on Older Participants’ User Experience of CAVs in a Simulator Environment

1. Jee, C., Mercer, C.: Driverless car news: the great driverless car race: where will the UK place? https://www.techworld.com/apps-wearables/great-driverless-car-race-where-will-uk-place-3598209/ (2017)

2. SAE International: U.S. Department of transportation’s new policy on automated vehicles adopts SAE International’s levels of automation for defining driving automation in on-road motor vehicles (2016)

   Google Scholar 

3. Musselwhite, C., Haddad, H.: Mobility, accessibility and quality of later life. Qual. Ageing Older Adults 11, 25–37 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Abraham, H., Lee, C., Brady, S., Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J..: Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: trust, preferences, and effects of age. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States (2017)

   Google Scholar 

5. Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Garrosa Hernández, E., Morante Benadero, M.A., et al.: Terminal versus non-terminal care in physician burnout: the role of decision-making processes and attitudes to death. Salud Ment. 31, 93–101 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

6. Mills, M.E., Sullivan, K.: The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J. Clin. Nurs. 8, 631–642 (1999)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Ussher, J., Kirsten, L., Butow, P., Sandoval, M.: What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Soc. Sci. Med. 62, 2565–2576 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Lautizi, M., Laschinger, H.K.S., Ravazzolo, S.: Workplace empowerment, job satisfaction and job stress among Italian mental health nurses: an exploratory study. J. Nurs. Manag. 17, 446–452 (2009)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Ozer, E.M., Bandura, A.: Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 472 (1990)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Pearson, L.C., Moomaw, W.: The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educ. Res. Q. 29, 37 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

11. Morgan, P., Caleb-Solly, P., Voinescu, A., Williams, C.: Literature review: human-machine interface. Project report, UWE Bristol, Bristol (2016)

    Google Scholar 

12. Morgan, P.L., Voinescu, A., Williams, C., Caleb-Solly, P., Alford, C., Shergold, I., Parkhurst, G., Pipe, A.: An emerging framework to inform effective design of human-machine interfaces for older adults using connected autonomous vehicles. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, pp. 325–334. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

13. Gable, T.M., Walker, B.N., Gable, T.: Georgia tech simulator sickness screening protocol, 16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

14. Watson, D., Anna, L., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS Scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in Psychology, pp. 139–183. Elsevier (1988)

    Google Scholar 

16. Buysse, D.J., Reynolds III, C.F., Monk, T., Berman, S.R., Kupfer, D.J.: The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 28, 193–213 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Taylor, R.M., Selcon, S.J.: Cognitive quality and situational awareness with advanced aircraft attitude displays. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, vol. 34, pp. 26–30 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., Bengler, K.: Trust in automation – before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manuf. 3, 3025–3032 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Ben-Shakhar, G.: Standardization within individuals: a simple method to neutralize individual differences in skin conductance. Psychophysiology 22, 292–299 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R.: The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 159–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Ben-Shakhar, G., Bornstein, G., Hopfensitz, A., Van Winden, F.: Reciprocity and emotions: arousal, self-reports, and expectations. CESifo Working Paper 1298, pp. 1–16 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

22. Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Nomura, T.: The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI Soc. 21, 217–230 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Stafford, R.Q., Broadbent, E., Jayawardena, C., Unger, U., Kuo, I.H., Igic, A., Wong, R., Kerse, N., Watson, C., MacDonald, B.A.: Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot. In: 2010 IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 82–87. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

24. Nomura, T., Shintani, T., Fujii, K., Hokabe, K.: Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allowable distance of robots. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Chamonix, France, pp. 13–18. ACTA Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

25. McLucas, A.C.: Decision Making: Risk Management, Systems Thinking and Situation Awareness. Argos Press P/L, Canberra (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references