Abstract
The adoption of Software Process Improvement (SPI) initiatives, based on reference models, such as CMMI-DEV, is largely described in the literature. Challenges and benefits are already known, especially when these models are combined with agile methods. However, little is known on what happens after the appraisal. Do companies continue to use maturity models-based processes? Do they sacrifice agile practices? The objective of this study is thus to identify how software processes evolve in companies that use agile methods and have been assessed against maturity-based reference models. We performed a case study in four companies. Our results show that companies that use agile methods struggle to use, maintain and evolve their processes along with maturity models after the official assessment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
CMMI recently evolved to CMMIv2.0 [2]. The architecture of the model is quite different from the previous ones. Appraisal method was also updated.
References
CMMI Product Team: CMMI for Development v1.3. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Technical report CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033 (2010)
CMMI Institute: CMMI for Development v2.0 (2018). https://cmmiinstitute.com/products/cmmi/cmmi-v2-products
Fontana, R.M., Albuquerque, R., Luz, R., Moises, A.C., Malucelli, A., Reinehr, S.: Maturity models for agile software development: what are they? In: Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2018. CCIS, vol. 896, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_1
Almeida, C.D.A., Albuquerque, A.B., Macedo, T.C.: Analysis of the continuity of software processes execution in software organizations assessed in MPS.BR using Grounded Theory. In: Conference: Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Miami (2011)
Uskarcı, A., Demirörs, O.: Do staged maturity models result in organization-wide continuous process improvement? Insight from employees. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 52, 25–40 (2017)
Albuquerque, R., Malucelli, A., Reinehr, S.: Software process improvement programs: what happens after official appraisal. In: 30th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2018) (2018). https://doi.org/10.18293/SEKE2018-186
Lina, Z., Dan, S.: Research on combining scrum with CMMI in small and medium organizations. In: 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering, pp. 554–557 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSEE.2012.477
Bass, J.M., Allison, I.K., Banerjee, U.: Agile method tailoring in a CMMI level 5 organization. J. Int. Technol. Inf. Manag. 22(4), 5 (2013)
Jakobsen, C., Sutherland, J.: Scrum and CMMI – going from good to great. Are you ready-ready to be done-done? In: Agile 2009, Chicago (2009)
Cohan, S., Glazer, H.: An agile development team’s quest for CMMI maturity level 5. In: Agile Conference, 24–29 August, pp. 201–206 (2009)
Tuan, N.N., Thang, H.O.: Combining maturity with agility – lessons learnt from a case study. In: 4th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, SoICT 2013, Danang, Viet Nam, 05–06 December (2013)
SOFTEX: General Guide to MPS Software (2016). http://www.softex.br/mpsbr
Nurdiani, I., Börstler, J., Fricker, S., Petersen, K.: Usage, retention, and abandonment of agile practices: a survey and interviews results. e-Informatica Softw. Eng. J. 13(1), 7–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5277/e-Inf190101
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods), 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, p. 312. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi (1998)
Eisenhardt, K.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
Pries-Heje, P., Johansen, J.: SPI Manifesto (2010). http://2018.eurospi.net/images/eurospi/spi_manifesto.pdf
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported By CNPQ (National Council of Scientific and Technological Development) under the grant number 311176/2015-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Albuquerque, R., Fontana, R., Malucelli, A., Reinehr, S. (2019). Agile Methods and Maturity Models Assessments: What’s Next?. In: Walker, A., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1060. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28004-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28005-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)