Abstract
Design synthesis is a process of cognitive development that aims to manage complexity or seek to avoid confusion. Design is always a comprehensive synthesis of market demand, technology trends and business needs. In the synthesis process, designers attempt to organize, manipulate, trim, and filter the collected data to form a cohesive conceptual construction system. The design synthesis reveals cohesion and continuity; the combination shows the improvement of the organization, the reduction of complexity and the formation of idealized clarity and conceptualization. However, this cognitive synthesis is often not so obvious or even completely hidden. This article attempts to define this reasoning process from the perspective of psychology and takes it seriously in its universal significance in the entire design process. This paper investigates that the following claims: (1) There are three types of applicability of abductive reasoning for design synthesis including: identification of implicit design targets, idealization of innovative design concepts, and diagnosis of violating design constraints or design axioms. These three components have a common basis: conceptualization and reconceptualization. They can be taken as sense making from chaos and uncertainty. (2) Synthesis is an abductive thinking process. Abductive reasoning related to insight and creative problem solving, and it is this creative problem solving that is at the heart of the design synthesis methods. (3) Conceptualization relates three specific sub-processes: prioritizing, judging, and forging. Conceptualization is changeable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Veen, J.: The Art and Science of Web Design. New Riders Press, Indianapolis (2000)
Kolko, J.: Information architecture and design strategy: the importance of synthesis during the process of design. In: Educational Conference Proceedings. IDSA, San Francisco (2007)
Fallman, D.: Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of CHI (Association for Computing Machinery), pp. 225–232 (2003)
Klein, G., Moon, B., Hoffman, R.: Making sense of sensemaking 1: alternative perspectives. Intell. Syst. (IEEE) 21(4), 71 (2006)
Coyne, R.: Logic Models of Design. Pitman, London (1988)
Johnson-Laird, P.: The shape of problems. In: The Shape of Reason: Essays in Honour of Paolo Legrenzi, V Girotto (eds.), pp. 3–26. Psychology Press (2005)
De Bono, E.: Serious creativity. J. Qual. Particip. 18(5), 12 (1995)
Kolko, J.: Information architecture: synthesis techniques for the muddy middle of the design process. In: 23rd International Conference on the Beginning Design Student Proceedings, Savannah (2007)
Liu, A., Stephen, C.-Y.L.: Alternation of analysis and synthesis for concept generation. CIRP Ann. 63(1), 177–180 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fei, D. (2019). Abductive Thinking, Conceptualization, and Design Synthesis. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02052-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02053-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)