Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Generalised Method for Adaptive Longitudinal Control Using Reinforcement Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Autonomous Systems 15 (IAS 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 867))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Adaptive cruise control (ACC) seeks intelligent and adaptive methods for longitudinal control of the cars. Since more than a decade, high-end cars have been equipped with ACC typically through carefully designed model-based controllers. Unlike the traditional ACC, we propose a reinforcement learning based approach – RL-ACC. We present the RL-ACC and its experimental results from the automotive-grade car simulators. Thus, we obtain a controller which requires minimal domain knowledge, is intuitive in its design, can accommodate uncertainties, can mimic human-like behaviour and may enable human-trust in the automated system. All these aspects are crucial for a fully autonomous car and we believe reinforcement learning based ACC is a step towards that direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The vehicle is equipped with both long and short range radars with limits [80, 240] and [0.2 100] m respectively. Unlike the problems like parking, the ACC does not require very close range detection. Here, sensor fusion is used to homogenise the readings from both the radars.

References

  1. Drivecore - ces2018. http://wardsauto.com/technology/visteon-looks-play-big-role-autonomous-vehicles-drivecore/. Accessed Feb 2018

  2. Oktal - simulation in motion. http://www.oktal.fr/en/automotive/range-of-simulators/software. Accessed Feb 2018

  3. Vtd - virtual test drive. https://vires.com/vtd-vires-virtual-test-drive/. Accessed Feb 2018

  4. Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A., Sugiyama, Y.: Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys. Rev. E 51(2), 1035 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boer, E.R.: Car following from the drivers perspective. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2(4), 201–206 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brackstone, M., McDonald, M.: Car-following: a historical review. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2(4), 181–196 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gazis, D.C., Herman, R., Rothery, R.W.: Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper. Res. 9(4), 545–567 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gipps, P.G.: A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 15(2), 105–111 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, R., Regan, D.: Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Res. 38(4), 499–512 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Helly, W.: Simulation of bottlenecks in single lane traffic flow, presentation at the symposium on theory of traffic flow. Research laboratories, General Motors, New York, pp. 207–238 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lagoudakis, M.G., Parr, R.: Least-squares policy iteration. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4(Dec), 1107–1149 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Littman, M.L., Dean, T.L., Leslie, P.K.: On the complexity of solving markov decision problems, pp. 394–402. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michaels, R.M.: Perceptual factors in car following. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow, London, England, OECD (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., Riedmiller, M.: Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprintarXiv:1312.5602 (2013)

  15. Moody, J., Saffell, M.: Learning to trade via direct reinforcement. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 12(4), 875–889 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagel, K., Schreckenberg, M.: A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Journal de physique I 2(12), 2221–2229 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Newell, G.F.: A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 36(3), 195–205 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters, J., Vijayakumar, S., Schaal, S.: Reinforcement learning for humanoid robotics. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 1–20 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, vol. 1. MIT Press Cambridge, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 62(2), 1805 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiedemann, R.: Simulation des straßenverkehrsflusses. schriftenreihe heft 8. Institute for Transportation Science, University of Karlsruhe, Germany (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shashank Pathak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pathak, S., Bag, S., Nadkarni, V. (2019). A Generalised Method for Adaptive Longitudinal Control Using Reinforcement Learning. In: Strand, M., Dillmann, R., Menegatti, E., Ghidoni, S. (eds) Intelligent Autonomous Systems 15. IAS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 867. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01370-7_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics