Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to compare the two major types of formalization strategies through the disambiguation of natural language textual ambiguities. The method is: The first step is to select the same text. Using poetry as an example, two types of formal strategies are used to resolve the ambiguities that exist. The second step is to analyze the limitations of the first formal path, at the same time, using traditional artificial intelligence methods and a new generation of artificial intelligence. The third step is to use the double-word board tools and methods to do the same thing. The result is that using the first path, whether based on rules (traditional artificial intelligence methods) or on statistical and machine learning, especially deep learning (a new generation of artificial intelligence methods), only local solutions can be obtained; With the checkerboard tools and methods, the overall solution can be obtained. This shows the unique advantages of the second path. Its significance lies in: using the double-word chessboard tool and method (second path) can solve the common problems faced by traditional artificial intelligence and new generation of artificial intelligence, and how to eliminate the ambiguity of natural language texts. The most important thing is that it has a new role. The most typical is to construct a knowledge base of the subject through the acquisition of knowledge and formal expression of experts, so as to gradually resolve a series of ambiguities between natural language (text) processing and formalized understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Waltz, D.L.: On understanding poetry. In: Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (1975)
Bai, M.-H., Chen, K.-J., Chang, J.S.: (Sense extraction and disambiguation for Chinese words from bilingual terminology bank). In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing, pp. 305–316, September 2005. (in Chinese)
Zou, X.H., Zou, S., Ke, L.: Fundamental law of information: proved by both numbers and characters in conjugate matrices. In: IS4SI (2017)
Zou, X.H.: Bilingual information processing method and principle, 69–76, 102 (2015)
Zou, S.: Formal bilingual chessboard spectrum: show the overlapping between language and mind. In: AAAS 2017 Annual Meeting, February 2017
Liu, C.-L., Chang, C.-N., Hsu, C.-T., Cheng, W.-H., Wang, H., Chiu, W.-Y.: (Textual analysis of complete tang poems for discoveries and applications - style, antitheses, social networks, and couplets). In: Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2015), pp. 43–57 (2015). (in Chinese)
Agirrezabal, M., Alegria, I., Hulden, M.: Machine learning for metrical analysis of english poetry. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 772–781, December (2016)
Jin, W.: Chinese segmentation disambiguation. In: COLING 1994 Volume 2: The 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (1994)
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labelling sequence data. Department of Computer & Information Science (2001)
Zou, S., Zou, X.: Understanding: how to resolve ambiguity. In: Shi, Z., Goertzel, B., Feng, J. (eds.) ICIS 2017. IAICT, vol. 510, pp. 333–343. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68121-4_36
Acknowledgement
All sources of funding of the study have been disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hua, W., Zou, S., Zou, X., Liu, G. (2018). Using Two Formal Strategies to Eliminate Ambiguity in Poetry Text. In: Shi, Z., Pennartz, C., Huang, T. (eds) Intelligence Science II. ICIS 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01313-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01313-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01312-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01313-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)