Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

A Comparison Between Term-Based and Embedding-Based Methods for Initial Retrieval

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Retrieval (CCIR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11168))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1134 Accesses

Abstract

The initial retrieval stage of information retrieval aims to generate as many relevant candidate documents as possible in a simple yet efficient way. Traditional term based retrieval methods like BM25 deal with the problem based on Bag-of-Words (BoW) representation, thus they only focus on exact matching (i.e., syntactic) and lack the consideration for semantically related words. That causes the typical vocabulary mismatch problem and the reduction of performance in terms of recall. The advance of distributed representation (i.e., embedding) of words and documents provides an efficient way to measure the semantic relevance between words. Since embedding can alleviate the vocabulary mismatch problem, it is suitable for the initial retrieval task. We conduct several experiments to compare term based models with embedding based models in terms of recall. We compare above two branches of the initial retrieval models on three representative retrieval tasks (Web-QA, Ad-hoc retrieval and CQA respectively). The results show that embedding based method and term based method are complementary for each other and higher recall can be achieved by combining the above two types of models based on scores or ranking position. We find that combination of the two types of the models based on ranking position usually perform better than combination based on score. Furthermore, since queries and documents are in different forms for diverse application scenarios, it can be observed that the relative performance of the two types are almost same but the absolute performance are significant different regarding to distinct scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/glove/.

References

  1. Blooma, M.J., Kurian, J.C.: Research issues in community based question answering. In: PACIS, p. 29 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burges, C., et al.: Learning to rank using gradient descent. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 89–96. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, Z., Qin, T., Liu, T.-Y., Tsai, M.-F., Li, H.: Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 129–136. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carmel, D., Mejer, A., Pinter, Y., Szpektor, I.: Improving term weighting for community question answering search using syntactic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 351–360. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dang, V., Bendersky, M., Croft, W.B.: Two-stage learning to rank for information retrieval. In: Serdyukov, P. (ed.) ECIR 2013. LNCS, vol. 7814, pp. 423–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36973-5_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Firth, J.R.: A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In: Studies in Linguistic Analysis (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galitsky, B.: Natural language question answering system: technique of semantic headers. Advanced Knowledge International (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, J., Fan, Y., Ai, Q., Croft, W.B.: A deep relevance matching model for ad-hoc retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 55–64. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, J., Fan, Y., Ai, Q., Croft, W.B.: Semantic matching by non-linear word transportation for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 701–710. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, Z.S.: Distributional structure. Word 10(2–3), 146–162 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, P.-S., He, X., Gao, J., Deng, L., Acero, A., Heck, L.: Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 2333–2338. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huston, S., Croft, W.B.: Parameters learned in the comparison of retrieval models using term dependencies. Ir, University of Massachusetts (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krovetz, R.: Viewing morphology as an inference process. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval, pp. 191–202. ACM (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1188–1196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, J.: The web as a resource for question answering: perspectives and challenges. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002). Citeseer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lu, Z., Li, H.: A deep architecture for matching short texts. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1367–1375 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pang, L., Lan, Y., Guo, J., Xu, J., Xu, J., Cheng, X.: DeepRank: a new deep architecture for relevance ranking in information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 257–266. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patra, B.: A survey of community question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.04009 (2017)

  20. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perera, R.: IPedagogy: question answering system based on web information clustering. In: 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), pp. 245–246. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ponte, J.M., Croft, W.B.: A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 275–281. ACM (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S.: Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In: Croft, B.W., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds.) SIGIR ’94, pp. 232–241. Springer, New York (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Turtle, H., Croft, W.B.: Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 9(3), 187–222 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vulić, I., Moens, M.-F.: Monolingual and cross-lingual information retrieval models based on (bilingual) word embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 363–372. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: Two-stage language models for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 49–56. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In: ACM SIGIR Forum, vol. 51, pp. 268–276. ACM (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tonglei Guo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guo, T., Guo, J., Fan, Y., Lan, Y., Xu, J., Cheng, X. (2018). A Comparison Between Term-Based and Embedding-Based Methods for Initial Retrieval. In: Zhang, S., Liu, TY., Li, X., Guo, J., Li, C. (eds) Information Retrieval. CCIR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11168. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01012-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01012-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01011-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01012-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics