Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Study, Build, Repeat: Using Online Communities as a Research Platform

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ways of Knowing in HCI

Abstract

Research on online communities raises a number of challenges. It is difficult to get access to usage data, to users (to interview), and to the system itself to introduce new features (e.g., participation incentive mechanisms). One solution is for researchers to create an online community themselves. Although this provides more control and access, it also requires additional resources (e.g., for staff to maintain the community) and consideration of the needs of the user community after the research is completed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 15.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    API stands for Application Programming Interface, a published protocol that defines a set of functionality that a software component makes available to programmers who may want to use that component. A plug-in is a piece of software that is added to a larger software application to extend or customize its functionality.

  2. 2.

    We defined “damage” to an article through a combination of algorithmic detection and manual coding to evaluate the accuracy of our algorithm.

  3. 3.

    As detailed in the paper, our analysis relied on Wikipedia editors’ self-reported gender.

  4. 4.

    When we began doing these live studies, we realized that we had to obtain Institutional Review Board approval, which we did and which has become routine across all our communities and experiments. Note that our “terms of use” say that we have the right to log and analyze behavioral data for research purposes; we also guarantee that we will not disclose any personal or identifying data in our published research. However, we do obtain IRB approval when we do surveys and interviews or introduce new features explicitly to evaluate for research purposes.

  5. 5.

    Many of our effect sizes were small, although still significant. Note that we achieved these results with thousands of users. This illustrates that size does matter: the number of users in a community limits the number and types of experiments it can support. For example, as of this writing, we typically can get 50–80 experiments for Cyclopath experiments, while we can get an order of magnitude more subjects in MovieLens. Nonetheless, we sometimes have to schedule several MovieLens experiments in sequence because there are not enough users (or at least not of the desired type, say new users) for both experiments to run in parallel.

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, Leadership, and Men, 27(3), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. A. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) ’12, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, P., Hecht, B., Carton, S., Quaderi, M., Horn, M., & Gergle, D. (2012). Omnipedia: bridging the wikipedia language gap. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1075–1084). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1909–1912). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M., & Campbell, R. L. (1989). Artifacts as psychological theories: The case of human-computer interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 8(4), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M., & Kellogg, W. (1989). Artifact as theory-nexus: Hermeneutics meets theory-based design. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 7–14). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Geyer, W., Dugan, D., Muller, M., & Guy, I. (2009). Make new friends, but keep the old: Recommending people on social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’09) (pp. 201–210). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Ren, Y., & Riedl, J. (2010). The effects of diversity on group productivity and member withdrawal in online volunteer groups. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 821–830). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, E. H. (2009). A position paper on ‘living laboratories’: Rethinking ecological designs and experimentation in human-computer interaction. In Presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part I: New Trends, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., et al. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2003). Teaching objects-first in introductory computer science. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’03) (pp. 191–195). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2005). How oversight improves member-maintained communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’05) (pp. 11–20). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2006). Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1037–1046). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2007). SuggestBot: Using intelligent task routing to help people find work in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 32–41). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., Albert, I., Konstan, J. A, & Riedl, J. (2003). Is seeing believing?: How recommender system interfaces affect users’ opinions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’03) (pp. 585–592). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbish, L., Farzan, R., Kraut, R., & Postmes, T. (2012). Fresh faces in the crowd: Turnover, identity, and commitment in online groups. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 245–248). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, E. M., Geyer, W., & Millen, D. R. (2010). The network effects of recommending social connections. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’10) (pp. 301–304). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Duganm, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’08) (pp. 711–720). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2011). Cultivating social resources on facebook: Signals of relational investment and their role in social capital processes. In Proceedings of the Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 330–337). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzan, R., DiMicco, J. M., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., Geyer, W., & Brownholtz, E. A. (2008). Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08) (pp. 563–572). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglestad, P. T., Dwyer, P. C., Filson Moses, J., Kim, J. S., Mannino, C. A., Terveen, L., et al. (2012). What makes users rate (share, tag, edit…)? Predicting patterns of participation in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 969–978). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, E. (2012). Predicting tie strength in a new medium. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’12) (pp. 1047–1056). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., & Riedl, J. (2011). Don’t bite the newbies: How reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (pp. 163–172). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfaker, A., Song, B., Stuart, D. A., Kittur, A., & Riedl, J. (2011). NICE: Social translucence through UI intervention. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (pp. 101–104). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., & Riedl, J. (1999). An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’99) (pp. 230–237). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W. C., & Terveen, L. G. (1996) Using frequency-of-mention in public conversations for social filtering. In Proceedings of the ACM 1996 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’96) (pp. 106–112). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kairam, S., Brzozowski, M. J., Huffaker, D., & Chi, E. H. (2012) Talking in circles: Selective sharing in Google+. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, N., Konstan, J. A., & Terveen, L. G. (2005). How peer photos influence member participation in online communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’05) (pp. 1525–1528). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07) (pp. 1455–1467). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, J. A., Miller, B., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J., Gordon, L., & Riedl, J. (1997). GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. K., Uduwage, A., Dong, Z., Sen, S., Musicant, D. R., Terveen, L., et al. (2011). WP:Clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia’s gender imbalance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 167–170). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2007). Profile elements as signals in an online social network. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07) (pp. 435–444).New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., & Roth, B. (2012). Implementing social media in public sector organizations. Paper presented at the iConference ’12, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A., & Ozkaya, E. (2010). Motivations to participate in online communities. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp: 1927–1936). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., et al. (2005). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35 year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masli, M., Priedhorsky, R., & Terveen, L. (2011). Task specialization in social production communities: The case of geographic volunteer work. In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011) (pp. 217–224). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Inglewood, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNee, S. M., Lam, S. K., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2003). Interfaces for eliciting new user preferences in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 178–188). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskal, B., Lurie, D., & Cooper, S. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 671–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panciera, K., Halfaker, A., & Terveen, L. (2009) Wikipedians are born, not made: A study of power editors on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Group Work (pp. 51–60). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panciera, K., Priedhorsky, R., Erickson, T., & Terveen, L. (2010). Lurking? Cyclopaths?: A quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10) (pp. 1917–1926). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pausch, R., Burnette, T., Capeheart, A. C., Conway, M., Cosgrove, D., DeLine, R., et al. (1995). Alice: Rapid prototyping system for virtual reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15(3), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peesapati, S. T., Schwanda, V., Schultz, J., Lepage, M., Jeong, S. Y., & Cosley, D. (2010). Pensieve: Supporting everyday reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10) (pp. 2027–2036). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 484–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S. K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2007). Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 259–268). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priedhorsky, R., Jordan, B., & Terveen, L. (2007). How a personalized geowiki can help bicyclists share information more effectively. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym ’07) (pp. 93–98). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priedhorsky, R., Masli, M., & Terveen, L. (2010). Eliciting and focusing geographic volunteer work. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’10) (pp. 61–70). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priedhorsky, R., Pitchford, D., Sen, S., & Terveen, L. (2012). Recommending routes in the context of bicycling: Algorithms, evaluation, and the value of personalization. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’12) (pp. 979–988). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priedhorsky, R., & Terveen, L. (2008). The computational geowiki: What, why, and how. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’08) (pp. 267–276). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priedhorsky R., & Terveen, L. (2011). Wiki grows up: Arbitrary data models, access control, and beyond. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym ’11) (pp. 63–71). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. M., Albert, I., Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., McNee, S., Konstan, J. A., et al. (2002). Getting to know you: Learning new user preferences in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI2002) (pp. 127–134). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Mis Quarterly, 36(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994). In R. Furuta & C. Neuwirth (Eds.). GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of Netnews. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’94) (pp. 175–186). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, C., Wohn, D. Y., Lampe, C., & DeMaagd, K. (2012). A quantitative explanation of governance in an online peer-production community. Paper presented at the 30th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar, B. M., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2000). Analysis of recommender algorithms for E-commerce. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 158–167). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2008). Volunteerism: Social issues perspectives and social policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (pp. 245–254). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, B., Chi. E. H., Kittur, A., & Pendleton, B. A. (2008). Lifting the veil: Improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08) (pp. 1037–1040). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terveen, L., Hill, W., Amento, B., McDonald, D., & Creter, J. (1997). PHAOKS: A system for sharing recommendations. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Ahn, L. (2006). Games with a purpose. IEEE Computer Magazine, 39(6), 92–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2008). General techniques for designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. D. (2010). Collaborative online video watching. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohn, D. Y., Velasquez, A., Bjornrud, T., & Lampe, C. (2012). Habit as an explanation of participation in an online peer-production community. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (pp. 2905–2914). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the National Science Foundation under grants IIS 08-08692, IIS 10-17697, IIS 09-68483, IIS 08-12148, and IIS 09-64695.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loren Terveen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Terveen, L., Konstan, J.A., Lampe, C. (2014). Study, Build, Repeat: Using Online Communities as a Research Platform. In: Olson, J., Kellogg, W. (eds) Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0377-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0378-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics